User:Frogskat/Helen Rodríguez Trías/Dann.devito Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Frogskat
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Frogskat/Helen_Rodr%C3%ADguez_Tr%C3%ADas?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Helen Rodríguez Trías
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
- I like the addition of an education section. It gave more insight into how she ended up where she did. If you could include what she studied, that would be awesome, but if you can't find that information, that's okay too :)
- The medical career section was very interesting. Did she have any other careers in the medical field?
- You did a nice job editing this post and cleaning it up to be concise and informational. Good job!! I think just a touch more elaboration on some points would be helpful, but overall, very well done.