User:Isiah.Duggan/Deathcare/Wiki.insight Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Nzahid, AubreyPMR, Isiah.Duggan
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
editI believe the team did a great job of introducing the topic. Each subsection was clearly labeled and organized. The history subsection was very thorough and writers had done a great job of finding relevant and current sources to highlight. I did click on a few sources and all links seem to be working. One quick comment would be modify citation #24 by removing/adding the source date. Furthermore, the tone of the article was neutral and I did not identify any claims that were biased toward a particular position. Overall, I thought the article was very well written, concise, and easy to understand. The featured image definitely improved understanding of the topic and was captioned, and I appreciated that they included information on how COVID-19 affected the practice of death care.