Jarry1250

Babel user information

en-N	This user has a native understanding of English.

fr-2	Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances intermédiaires en français.

de-2	Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau.

Userboxes

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify · RfA)

This user is a member of the Bot Approvals Group. (RfBAG)

This user contributes to MediaWiki

This user had an account on the Wikimedia Toolserver.

This user contributes media to Wikimedia Commons

This editor is a Veteran Editor IV and is entitled to display this Gold Editor Star.

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Henry VIII of England to Good Article status.

This user runs a bot, LivingBot (contribs). It performs tasks that are extremely tedious to do manually.

UK

This user uses British English.

PHP

This user is an advanced PHP Coder.

This user is secretly a monarchist .

Welcome to the user page of me, Jarry1250.

Views

In general, I am very happy with the policies and guidelines here on Wikipedia.

That is to say, I find that my personal views on how Wikipedia should function are close to the reality of how it is actually run. I am a moderate deletionist: whilst in an ideal world I would be happy to have Wikipedia catalogue everything and anything, in the real world I think it is reasonable to prioritise some articles over others, and simply not having articles on some subjects is the best way of achieving this. Wikipedia is run by volunteers with finite time and energy resources. It is impossible to maintain tens of millions of pages to any reasonable quality standard.

Wikipedia is not finished and will never be. This means that I will happily tolerate all kinds of "bad" articles if they can improved later, there is no cost in doing so (so no negative unsourced BLPs, for example) and the final result will be worth maintaining. Otherwise, my main concern is in making sure that editors carry on editing and are not held back by long-entanglements in process.