| Submission rejected on 9 July 2024 by The Herald (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by The Herald 4 months ago. Last edited by Benison 4 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 7 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 6 November 2023 by Nagol0929 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Nagol0929 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2023 by Hoary (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Hoary 14 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 20 August 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 15 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 August 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 15 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 August 2023 by Hey man im josh (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Hey man im josh 15 months ago. | |
Comment: Multiple declines with no actual efforts to improve the citations. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: "nterventi critici 1980-2014[1][2][3][4][5][6]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Not remotely clear how they would pass WP:NARTIST? Theroadislong (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: "It was in Paris that the painting of Jean-Pierre Groppx began to come to life." is unsourced and nonsensical? Theroadislong (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: fails WP:NARTIST and content like "home of the great Macchiaioli and Post-Macchiaioli painters" is totally irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thank you for condensing the text. There is something useful to work from. What you need now is to show why and how Jean-Pierre passes WP:BIO. Clearly he is notable to you. What we need to see is why and how he is notable to the world. Reading WP:NARTIST should help yoiu. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This draft demonstrates such intransigence in the face of requests by and advice from reviewers that it probably merits either (A) deletion and re-creation by a different and of course unrelated editor, or (B) deletion.If the next submission is not radically different from this one, I suggest that the reviewer should not decline it but instead reject it. Hoary (talk) 22:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: For notability, we need to see multiple independent and reliable secondary sources with significant coverage of the person.For verifiability, every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal and family details must be clearly supported by citations to reliable published sources.Two sources (at least one of which does not meet the above-described standard), each only once cited, is nowhere near enough for either purpose. Please do not resubmit until this is properly referenced. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Unreferenced, no evidence of notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
Jean-Pierre Groppx | |
|---|---|
| Born | Piero Groppi 2 January, 1943 Livorno, Italy |
| Died | 4 September, 2004 Como |
| Nationality | Italy |
Jean-Pierre Groppi (Groppx), a well known Italian painter, was born on 2 January 1943 in Livorno, Tuscany.
In 1966 he enrolled at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Paris.
In 1967 Jean-Pierre often went to the Louvre to copy old masterpieces. Later he returned to Tuscany.
During his paintings developpement he encounters his friends, some of these disappeared, Pietro Annigoni, Ferruccio Mataresi, Lorenzo Palazzi, Francesco Maria Pieri, Carlo Domenici, Novella Parigini , Harry Rosenthal.
He married in 1999 and opened an atelier in Cernobbio (on Lake Como) where he died suddenly on 4 September 2004. He has presented his art works among others at Villa d'Este (Cernobbio), Grand Hotel Villa Serbelloni (Bellagio), Consulate of Italy Switzerland-Locarno and Consulate General of Lugano and many other locations.
Numerous art critics have written about him, including Indro Montanelli, Ottorino Villatora[1] - Interventi critici 1980-2014[2][3][4][5][6][7]
Jean-Pierre exposed in different part of the world but more in the Comasco region.[8][9]
References/Notes and references
edit- ^ Villatora, Ottorino. "Elenco delle personalità luganesi". Wikipedia.
- ^ Villatora, Ottorino (2000). "Villatora Ottorino Interventi critici, 1980-2014, II maestro Jean Pierre Groppx (Groppi) Consolato Generale d'ltalia-Lugano, 2000" (PDF). admin.ch.
- ^ Villatora, Ottorino (2014). Interventi critici (in Italian). Edizioni Aline. p. 221. ISBN 9788887906257. COD:08NA.
- ^ Briccola, Stefania (7 July 2004). "Dipinge sul Lario un livornese formato in Francia". p. 42.
- ^ Briccola, Stefania (September 2004). "Jean-Pierre Groppx". Boè. Boè - Periodico bimestrale di informazione artistica e cultura - Anno 1 - no 4 Settembre - Ottobre 2004. pp. 174–175.
- ^ Valsecchi, Fermo (25 April 2000). "Vasconi, tre "maestri dello scatto" lariani al Consolato. Esposti, accanto alle immagini dei cernobbiesi, i quadri di Groppx". Corriere di Como. p. 12.
- ^ M., L. (1 May 2000). "Fotografia, a Lugano la luce". Corriere di Como. p. 20.
- ^ Briccola, Stefania (23 June 2004). "Groppx, i dettagli della vita". La Provincia. p. 43.
- ^ "Le foto dei Vasconi in mostra a Lugano". La Provincia. 1 May 2000.