User:Seahawk01/Notes:Traffic stop
(Redirected from User:Seahawk01/Talk:Traffic stop)
 | This is not a Wikipedia article: This is a workpage, a collection of material and work in progress that may or may not be incorporated into an article. It should not necessarily be considered factual or authoritative. |
search of automobiles - case law
edit- Carroll v. United States (1925) - The Carroll doctrine and Motor vehicle exception
- California v. Acevedo (1970) - with probable cause, can search car after towing it
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977) - for officer safety, can order driver and passenger out of car and pat-down
- United States v. Johns (1985) - three day delay OK after police take possession
- Colorado v. Bertine (1987) - can use evidence found during inventory search (only if dept has standardized policy)
- Maryland v Wilson (1997)
- Atwater v. City of Lago Vista (2001)
- Thornton v. United States (2004) - if arrest passenger, can search compartments and containers on passenger side of car
- Arizona v. Johnson (2009)
data on traffic stops
editThis should be a section talking about how states and cities collect data.
Nine states currently require police to report information on all their traffic stops, including the race or ethnicity of the drivers.[1]
California is phasing in by 2023 - is data available only on city portals? For example: Sacramento, San Deigo, San Francisco, etc.
TODO: figure out what are the other three states
References
- ^ "Police divided over how to respond to traffic stop data". December 7, 2017.
defective equipment stops
edit"To Reduce Bias, Some Police Departments Are Rethinking Traffic Stops". July 25, 2016.