User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive24

Deletion of Sales attitude persevarance

Why have you deleted attitude persevarance???? It has a refrenced definition of a well known term in psychology? What's the problem. Ifthe article is short than you have to help expanding it instead killing a newborn stub. At least have third paty opinion.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Attitude perseverance. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Borisu 18:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Sales Tax Management Services

Hello! Can you please explain to me why you are labeling this as SPAM? Ask any certified public accountant (CPA) about this information. There is no bias or blatant advertising. 3 companies are mentioned because they are providers of STMS. STMS is a term that is taking foot much like SaaS (software as a service) did 5 years ago. I can provide more references if need be. Please let me know since you deleted it without comment. Thanks for your feedback. I truly believe in this information and that it is valuable to the Accounting and Business professionals.

TaxManiacTaxManiacTaxManiac

Jaranda,

Please comment on your reasoning for deleting Sales Tax Management Services. I would hate to believe the deletion was out of ignorance but unless you can provide me with your logic it makes it difficult for users to contribute to Wikipedia and comment on Accounting practices.

Thank you.

TaxManiacTaxManiacTaxManiac

It read like an advert. See WP:CORP, WP:N, and WP:SPAM Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Month Day

I see that you've protected the page. Sort of makes sense but it still we be targeted by bots looking for uncategorized pages. If you don't mind, can you add a category (say Category:Unprintworthy redirects) just so it doesn't create problems? Thx. Pascal.Tesson 23:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Rise Up Singing

I see you deleted it a while back; do you recall the reason? DMacks 18:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Rise Up Singing. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DMacks 20:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Thank you, RenamedUser jaskldjslak901, for your constructive comments in my recent RFA, which passed with 86 support, 8 oppose, and 5 neutral !votes. I will keep in mind all your suggestions and/or concerns, and will try to live up to your standards. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as I possibly can, without frying my brain, of course.
Thank you once more,
· AndonicO ^Talk

Columns

I broke up the columns for you at the top of the page. Feel free to revert if you find it unsatisfactory. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 11:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AndyGibb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AndyGibb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

GAC backlog elimination drive

This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 23:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Jaranda. I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. It was closed at surprising 75/0/0, so I'm an admin now. MaxSem 22:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Selena-DreamingOfYou-wiki.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Selena-DreamingOfYou-wiki.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Michael Gaffey deletion contested

FYI, this was mistakenly posted on the wrong page:

i am working on bios for every San Francisco Police Chief who has served since 1851. Please reconsider deletion of Michael Gaffey. Hank chapot 17:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Why you deleted the article about Bobby Maples on 12 March 2007?

Maples was one of the best NFL players at his position in his time, he is in the top 250 players of all-time in games played and his bio should be included in Wikipedia. I have recreated the article, hope it don't get deleted without an explanation again. Gypaetus 17:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

College

You'll find that only bad professors waste all your time. The good professors know how to present the material well without having to waste hundreds of hours of student time. — Deckill er 16:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Good luck in college! -- DS1953 ^talk 16:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to see you go Jaranda. Good luck! Acalamari 22:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not exactly leaving, I will do some editing once in a while, but I need to put college first and I just don't need the tools. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Great! There are always more sports articles waiting to be created or improved. -- DS1953 ^talk 20:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Re-upload image

Hi, I was wondering if I could re-upload Image:1993 Topps Pete Incaviglia.jpg. It was part of an article that you undeleted but the image was never put back? Libro0 19:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I didn't delete it, very likely that someone used the card to profile the player, and because that's copyrighted it gets deleted, but I think you could reupload it as it shows the 1993 Topps set. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD Help

Hi, six of my articles have put up by AfD by the same person and are being voted on all by the same persons.. I was wondering if you could look the articles over and the things written on the discussion pages and give me your honest answer as to should they be up for vote or am I being paranoid? The articles are:

Last week I lost one of my articles and I thought it was a good faith AfD but now with six more up for vote this week I think there is more behind these AfD then good faith. Callelinea 13:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFA/ACL 2

Thanks for your support in my RfA. :) Your own RfA is well on it's way to being a huge success. Acalamari 22:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome. I've edited a few times anonymously, but recently decided to sign up. I also noticed that you reverted my edit to Curt Schilling. I undid your edit, but I changed some of the wording and found a source. Feel free to take a look at it and correct me if I did something wrong. Pats Sox Princess 22:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

And i just submitted (and confirmed) my e-mail address, and clicked the button to allow other users to email me. But I don't see links to it on my user page or talk page. Pats Sox Princess 22:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out to me Pats Sox Princess 04:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Update

I've got some good news on my talk page... Qst 19:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I just wish I had not made all of them vile and disgusting edit summaries, do you think that I could have just my user talk deleted then I'd just re-create it exactly the same but a lot of them disgusting edit summaries would be gone? Qst 19:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I personally doubt it for because it is important to keep the history of someone talk page and most admins won't do it. But I doubt this insident will affect a future RFA about 5-6 months from now, if you don't have any other issues. Sorry about that Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Article writing

Seeing as you're currently opposing me because of my lack of article writing, I would appreciate if you looked at this. I hope you don't mind me posting this on your talk page, but I know some people probably don't watchlist everything they ever edit. Thanks, R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 02:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

WORLD INDOOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE

Wikipedia Editor:

My name is Dan Ryan and I am Director of Communications for the World Indoor Football League.

As a daily internet user, I’ve been pleased with the entries for our league and teams on wikipedia. Imagine my concern when my league and teams have been singled out for deletion and not those of similar league, especially with the criteria listed.

1) Only four teams. Yes, this was of concern to the entire league, but this was a business decision. The sport of indoor football has been wrought with teams starting the season and not finishing. We started with four, and finished with four this season. 2) Pay structure. Our pay structure is similar to other leagues listed on wikipedia and slightly better than that of af2 – the arena football league’s development system. 3) The age-old debate about whether or not we are professional or semi-professional. We take pride in that many of our players are now being looked at by NFL, CFL and arena football teams, and our league has provided an opportunity to develop and showcase their skills.

I appreciate this opportunity to discus our league with you and appreciate the listings as they currently stand. My hope is that this deletion discussion is quickly resolved.

Feel free to visit our web site at www.wifl.us or e-mail me at dryan@wifl.us for further assistance.

Dan Ryan Director of Communications

P.S. – Jaranda, as an FIU student, you might appreciate that the Golden Panthers produced one of our league all-stars, Cory McKinney of Daytona Beach.

1-800_NEW_FUNK deletion

Hello Jaranda

First of all I'd like to apologize because English isn't my native language, so probably this text can be full of mistakes.

I'm writing concerning 1-800_NEW_FUNK entry in English Wikipedia. I've seen that you deleted it.

That page kept information about a musical album by Prince_(artist), like many other pages linked from Prince_discography (The_Gold_Experience, Musicology_(album), etc).

I don't know the reason for the deletion, but I think that page could be re-activated to improve it with aditional information about the album.

--El Pantera 20:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Because the article was only a track listing, didn't name the artist or anything. You can recreate the article with more information. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfB

Thank you, Jaranda, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3).
I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.
Most sincere regards, Hús ö nd 23:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Obrigado, Jaranda, por participares no meu RfB, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3).
Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões. Calorosos cumprimentos, Hús ö nd 23:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos
Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive

A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 23:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You are now an administrator

Congratulations, you are once more an administrator. You know the drill! :-) --Deskana (talk) 02:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, Jaranda; you had your rights changed by the new bureaucrat too. :) Acalamari 02:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Why did you delete the COED Magazine article?

did you not read the talk page? we are a legit news source, printed publication and so on. How can collegehumor.com, tmz.com and other websites have wikipedia pages and we can't? at lease explain it to me so I know what i'm doing wrong so I canove forward with building a new page that meets your requirements. --Coedmagonline 03:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

See WP:WEB, the magazine is likely notable, but the website isn't, the best thing to do is to add the info to the magazine article. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Your recomfirmation:

Sorry I didn't get to change my neutral vote to support - the nom finished before I could change it due to your reply to my concerns. Anyway, I doubt you wont make a great admin again. Cheers, Spawn Man 04:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Congrats on your RFA. Politics rule 15:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Why was my page deleted when I posted a reason why not to delete it

The Misa Campo page was deleted, I was just wondering why when I posted a reason why I should be given a little more time... -- Huper Phuff ^talk 15:00, 11 July 2007 (MST)

Response to speedy deletion of Misa Campo

I posted it on the page too... But basically...I'm still adding content...It's just i'm trying to learn all the tags and stuff so I can cite things correctly...

I'm also referencing other wiki pages so I can professionally make a page that holds significant information and is properly worded and sounds informative -- Huper Phuff ^talk 15:00, 11 July 2007 (MST)

Recreate when the article isn't an infobox, and also the subject needs to meet WP:BIO, and the sources needs to be reliable sources, until then the article won't stand a chance. I hope that help. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Cherry Stoner

Any chance you can give a reason for deleting the above article? I'll have to report you to an Admin if this continues to happen. I am adding to the article, but am finding it difficult with you deleting it. I'd be interested to know your reasons for doing this, as far as I am aware these things must be discussed otherwise it's synonymous with vandalism. Feel free to do it on my talk page. s p u n k o 2 0 1 0 22:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherry stoner, I could have blocked you for recreating an article an hour after being deleted in AFD, but I protected it instead. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

yeah, and if you look into this user's contribs you'll see he called you an ass on my talk page, and on User talk:VTSPOWER. Cheers, Je tL ov er 23:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Monday Night Warriors deletion -- why?

Hello, why was my page on the San Francisco group "Monday Night Warriors" deleted? I would greatly appreciate a response. It is a legitimate group as any San Franciscan native knows. Gjtorikian 23:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

See [1] as it's a non-notable group. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

How can I further "assert the importance or significance of [the] subject"? I'm genuinely curious. The group has been in existence for some time. Is chronology not a big factor, or do I need to find group members of note (i.e., The Inklings would not be around of it did not consist of published fantasy writers). Thanks, Gjtorikian 23:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Add multiple, non trivial sources to claim notabilty. See WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Carpet

Hi, you have now deleted my article on Hereke carpets twice, so I know it is not an accident. Can you please tell me what was wrong with the article? Thanks. Rekk 23:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

It claims no reason why that type of carpet is notable, and it didn't give much information about that. If the article is expanded more and with Reliable sources, an article could be made on that. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Abuse

You deleted an article within minutes of my creating it (twice in a row, once while creating and then after I re-saved my additional edits!), while I was still researching/editing, without any reason or warning. I notice going through these comments that you tend to get a bit overzealous with your speedy deletes. My article was on municipal services, and thus potentially notable, wikipedia guidelines are that you give users the benefit of the doubt. Your behaviour is not in the spirit of wikipedia community, please be more respectful of others contributions. This is not your personal playground. --RandomStuff 23:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

A water treatment plant is non-notable, especially if it only gave an address and it's corriations see WP:CSD A7 and A1. I'm not abusing anything. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

You're a little quick on the trigger, cowboy. I suppose I can forgive you because of your youth and inexperience in life. The idea of a community-driven website is to encourage contribution, and speedy-delete was not meant for removing articles minutes after they were posted, re-read wikipedia guidelines. I put information into already-overcrowded Miami-Dade article for now. For future reference, propper ettiquite would be to post the issues that you feel make the article worthy of deletion and allow creator to address if possible --RandomStuff 23:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

read your comment on my complaint how you are not abusing, perhaps you are just over-enthusiastic. please give users at least an hour before (mis)using speedy-delete, many people work on articles in pieces as time permits. It is possible that what at first glance looks to you like it would not make a notable article may actually be interesting if you do not delete while people are still in the process of contributing/fixing their contributions. --RandomStuff 00:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

If he waited an hour then it wouldn't really be a speedy delete, now would it? Anyway, if the little bit of article you have written thus far doesn't assert notability, don't bother posting it yet. Compose it on your own computer and only upload the first revision once it stands on its own. Otherwise you're just going to keep having your stuff deleted. It's just not Jaranda doing this, it's all new article patrollers. --Cyde Weys 00:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Spunko2010

User's still rambling on his talk page...maybe you can protect it. Cheers, Je tL ov er 23:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Adam Bloom Article

Please can you tell me why you deleted my article on British stand up comedian Adam Bloom, it was comprehensive and gave exact information. Nothing on there was a personal opinion. There was a quote, but it was credited to the comedian Ricky Gervais, and explained how important and over looked Adam Bloom is in British comedy. If you tell me what was wrong I can change it.

Why was Adrian & the Mysterious D deleted?

I created an entry about DJs Adrian & the Mysterious D, which received a speedy delete from you. Why is that?

They are the creators of the international mashup event, Bootie (club night), and have received national and international attention, with monthly parties in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City, and Paris. Numerous national press articles have featured them (and these were documented on the Wikipedia entry) to ensure "notability."

The article contained facts, not opinions, and adhered to all Wikipedia guidelines.

Other lesser-known and less-accomplished mashup artists and DJs have Wikipedia pages, yet they don't. Adrian & the Mysterious D should have a page, as they are two of the most notable producers within this particular musical genre.

Tess Milan 23:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I undeleted that when I saw the sources, unlike most of the above, was a accidenttal deletion. Sorry about that Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Some Odd Help

Can you recommend a place where User:Disasterhelix can promote a band? I explained the situation on his talk page, and he's asking where he should go. I'm not that web-saavy when it comes to social networks and I'd rather not seem cold. -WarthogDemon 23:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I replied in his talk page Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of DJ Styles

I'm curious as to why the page DJ Styles was deleted?

Deletion of Finchampstead Baptist Church Article

Hi, I am confused as to why you deleted this article giving the reason that it was 'promoting the church'.

I specifically changed sentences from "We offer....or....You are welcome..." to "It offers...or...There are groups..." to try to take it away from a promotional site to a factual account of what goes on.

I was also going to update the article on the history of the church maybe with some photos. I believe this is relevant material that could be of interest to anyone researching the church.

I can understand if that information about the 'Groups and Activities' or the church may be considered promotional, so i am happy not to include that in the article, but i think an introduction to the article and a history section are relevant content for Wikipedia.

Please get back to me soon, or i will start a review of the deleted page.

Many thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave valler (talk • contribs) 10:50, July 12, 2007 (UTC)

It read like an avert anyways with the groups, etc, a church with 150 people is considered non-notable anyways. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 16:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Jet Car

Can you explain why you deleted my article on the fireforce jet car?

Mrdanward 16:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

The article read like a newspaper article, not an encyclopedia article, wouldn't never survive anything. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 16:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

OK then I will re-write the article, would prefer if you gave me some warning instead of just deleting the whole lot! Mrdanward 16:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Filmmaker James Myer

I'm curious why you deleted James Myer from the database? His documentary, Multiple Personality: Reality and Illusion, chronicles the life of Chris Costner-Sizemore, the first woman diagnosed with MPD. (This very notable and well known woman was also portrayed by Joanne Woodward in The Three Faces of Eve, for which Ms. Woodward won an Oscar). Among other works, his award winning The American Field Trip Series has been in world-wide distribution for over 12 years. All of this was verifiable on IMDB or otherwise listed and linked on Wikipedia. Shouldn't the creator of this well noted work have a place along side his creations? I respectfully ask that you please reconsider.

Thank you. Jazzzzy

Recreate if you want but with valid Reliable sources, and not only IMDB. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Jazzzzy

DJ Styles Deletion

Why was it deleted? can it be sent to me?

Dick Mann

I noticed that you deleted an article with this name. Was the article vandalism, or was it about the motorcycle racer in the Motorsports Hall of Fame of America? I'm not a betting man, but even I'd bet on vandalism. If it was real and about the racer, would you please replace my empty sandbox with the deleted article? Please respond here on your talk page. Thanks! Royalbroil 17:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Done, the article was mainly unsourced PoV when I deleted it. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow, I agree. There is little to work with. I am shocked that it was non-vandalism! Thanks! Royalbroil 20:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD of University of Maryland Gamer Symphony Orchestra

Jorge, I was wondering how it was that you came to the understanding that this article should be a delete? Only 4 persons thought it should be deleted and the other 7 thought it should be merged or kept. I was just curious how you came to that conclusion. I am not questioning if the conclusion is a good one, I just wanted to know how you came to that conclusion, so that I will know in the future. Thanks. Callelinea 22:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Several of the keep votes were because it was unique and that isn't a reason to keep, while there was no point in merging a University of Maryland club to the parent article because it will be too long, and bias against that one club. Wikipedia isn't a club directory. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

UFC 76

Hey, I had been one of the people supporting deletion of UFC 76 because there were no sources that met WP:RS and also there was simply generic information (which I voted deletion based on [[WP:#CBall]]. At this point, however, there are credible sources with notable information. If possible could you un-protect the page? Thanks and sorry for any hassles, appreciate your diligence. Thesaddestday 06:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

deletion DaxFlame?

I have to disagree with you on the outcome of the deletion process for the Daxflame article. There was no consensus. (I'm not a "single purpose account"!) There wasn't even a valid reason to delete it, except "unencyclopedic" and "pointless" (point of view!). Which makes no sense and certainly not a valid argument. (see WP:UGH and WP:UNENCYC). The article contains reliable sources which proves the notability of the subject. Please respond. — Slaapwel 09:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Can you answer this? — Slaapwel 14:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage design

Morning (GMT time), just a quick note to tell you I've copied your userpage design....:D I've left a hidden comment on the page. Yours is great.... Cheers, Rlest 11:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

RFA

I have been through RFA twice. Once withdrawn at about 25% support and going downhill. More recently I had about 45% if I recall. I want to wait until I get a few more things in order. In particular, the first WP:CHICOTW WP:FAC is under way with the Chicago Board of Trade Building. I also want to get Chris Young (pitcher) through WP:FAC and clean up All-Star Final Vote for WP:FLC before running. I had thought I would be ready this month, but it may be another month before I will be ready. I will be start preparing my candidacy statement however.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 13:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

The deletion log for Spite (band) was lacking in any content except that you deleted it. I can't even find the talk page for the article. None of my concerns were addresssed and the reason for deletion was never specified.--Libertyguy 22:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Spite (band) Deletion

The deletion log for Spite (band) was lacking in any content except that you deleted it. I can't even find the talk page for the article. None of my concerns were addresssed and the reason for deletion was never specified.--Libertyguy 23:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I have researched Wikipedia deletion policy, since my last post on this page, and came accross the following example of vandalism: "Abuse of tags Bad-faith placing of 'afd', 'delete', 'sprotected', or other tags on pages that do not meet such criteria. This includes removal of long-standing 'policy' and related tags without forming consensus on such a change first."

The article Spite (band) had a deletion tag placed there with the code: A7. I placed a 'hangon' tag there and asked for clarification in the discussion section. I looked up 'A7' and found this definition: "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If controversial, or if there has been a previous deletion discussion that resulted in the article being kept, the article should be listed at Articles for deletion instead."

While my initial language may not have asserted the importance of this band in a satisfactory manner, I quickly improved this article so the requirement was met. I identified this improvement on the talk page.

At such point, it was inappropriate to delete based on A7, since the article asserted said importance. Therefore, this looks like "Abuse of tags."--Libertyguy 21:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)