User:SomeGuyWhoRandomlyEdits/First dynasty of Ur

First dynasty of Ur
𒉆𒈗 𒋀𒀕𒆠

Ur I
Dynasty
CountrySumer
Current regionMesopotamia
Place of originUr
Foundedc. 2600 BCE (c. 2600 BCE)
FounderA-Imdugud (reign: c. 2600 BCE)
Final rulerElulu
Final headBalulu
Titles
List
Dissolutionc. 2112 BCE (c. 2112 BCE)
Depositionc. 2350 BCE (c. 2350 BCE)

The first dynasty of Ur (abbreviated Ur I) was a dynasty of rulers from the city of Ur who reign: c. 2600 – c. 2112 BCE. Ur I is (primarily) part of the Early Dynastic III period (c. 2600 – c. 2350 BCE) of ancient Mesopotamia. It was preceded by the first dynasty of Uruk on the Sumerian King List (SKL). Only four (out of a total of up to twelve) of the rulers from the first dynasty of Ur are mentioned on the SKL. Likewise on the SKL: the first dynasty of Ur was succeeded by an Elamite dynasty from Awan.

Rule

edit

The first dynasty may have been preceded by one other dynasty of Ur unnamed on the SKL which had extensive influence over the area of Sumer, and apparently led a union of south Mesopotamian polities.

Governors

edit

A-Imdugud (r. c. 2600 BCE) is the earliest archaeologically recorded ruler from Ur said to have held the Sumerian title for governor.

Kings

edit

Ur-Pabilsag is the earliest archaeologically recorded ruler from Ur said to have held the Sumerian title for king. He was preceded by his father (A-Imdugud).

Great kings

edit

Ur-Pabilsag may have succeeded by his son Meskalamdug (who r. c. 2600 – c. 2550 BCE as a king). Mesannepada (r. c. 2500 BCE) is the first king of Ur listed on the SKL. Two other rulers earlier than Mesannepada are known from other sources, namely Puabi (probably r. c. 2550 BCE with the Sumerian title for queen) and Akalamdug (r. c. 2600 – c. 2550, c. 2550 – c. 2500 BCE as king). It would seem that both Akalamdug and Mesannepada may have been sons of Meskalamdug, according to an inscription found on a bead in Mari, and Meskalamdug may have been the true founder of the first dynasty.

Mesilim (r. c. 2550 – c. 2500 BCE) may have enjoyed suzerainty over Ur and Adab. He is also mentioned in some of the earliest monuments as arbitrating a border dispute between Lagash and Umma. Mesilim's placement before, during, or after the reign of Mesannepada in Ur is uncertain, owing to the lack of other synchronous names in the inscriptions, and his absence from the SKL. Some have suggested that Mesilim and Mesannepada were in fact one and the same; however, others have disputed this theory. Both Mesilim and Mesannepada also seem to have subjected Kish, thereafter assuming the title king of Kish for themselves. The title king of Kish would be used by many kings of the preeminent dynasties for some time afterward.

High kings

edit

List of rulers

edit
# Depiction or inscription Ruler Approximated date and length of reign Succession and death details Notes and references

  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of king[a]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of high king[b]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of great king[c]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of emperor[d]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of king-emperor[e]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of governor[f]
  Denotes a ruler described with the Sumero-Akkadian equivalent for the title of God-Emperor[g]

Early Dynastic IIIa period (c. 2600 – c. 2500 BCE)
First dynasty of Ur (r. c. 2700 – c. 2112 BCE)
?   A-Imdugud r. c. 2600 BCE Unclear succession
?   Mesilim r. c. 2550 BCE Unclear succession
?   Ur-Pabilsag r. c. 2550 BCE He may have been the son of A-Imdugud
He may have died c. 2550 BCE
?   Puabi r. c. 2550 BCE Unclear succession
2nd   Meskiagnun I Uncertain
(36 years)
He may have been the son of Mesannepada
Early Dynastic IIIb period (c. 2500 – c. 2350 BCE)
First dynasty of Ur (r. c. 2700 – c. 2112 BCE)
?   Akalamdug r. c. 2500 BCE He may have been the father or son of Meskalamdug
?   Meskalamdug r. c. 2500 BCE He may have been the father or son of Akalamdug
First dynasty of Lagash (r. c. 2600 – c. 2260 BCE)
?   Eannatum r. c. 2455 BCE
(690 years)
Son of Urnanshe or Akurgal
First dynasty of Ur (r. c. 2700 – c. 2112 BCE)
1st   Mesannepada Uncertain
(80 years)
He may have been the son of Meskalamdug
?   A'annepada Uncertain Son of Mesannepada
Second dynasty of Uruk (r. c. 2550 – c. 2154 BCE)
?   Lugalkinishedudu r. c. 2400 BCE
(120 years)
Unclear succession
?   Lugal-kisalsi Uncertain Son of Lugalkinishedudu
First dynasty of Ur (r. c. 2700 – c. 2112 BCE)
3rd   Elulu Uncertain
(25 years)
Unclear succession
4th   Balulu Uncertain
(36 years)
Unclear succession
Proto-Imperial period (c. 2350 – c. 2334 BCE)
Second dynasty of Uruk (r. c. 2550 – c. 2154 BCE)
?   Enshakushanna r. c. 2350 BCE
(60 years)
He may have been the son of Elulu
First dynasty of Umma (r. c. 2900 – c. 2154 BCE)
?   Lugalzagesi r. c. 2340 – c. 2316 BCE
(25 or 34 years)
Son of Ukush
Akkadian period (c. 2334 – c. 2154 BCE)
Sargonic dynasty (r. c. 2334 – c. 2154 BCE)
?   Sargon r. c. 2334 – c. 2279 BCE
(37, 40, 50, 54, 55, or 56 years)
Son of La'ibum
First dynasty of Ur (r. c. 2700 – c. 2112 BCE)
? Lunanna Uncertain Unclear succession
Sargonic dynasty (r. c. 2334 – c. 2154 BCE)
?   Rimush r. c. 2278 – c. 2270 BCE
(7, 9, or 15 years)
Son of Sargon
?   Manishtushu r. c. 2269 – c. 2255 BCE
(7 or 15 years)
Son of Sargon
?   Naram-Suen r. c. 2254 – c. 2218 BCE
(36 or 56 years)
Son of Manishtushu

International trade

edit

The Ur I dynasty had enormous wealth as shown by the lavishness of its tombs. This was probably due to the fact that Ur acted as the main harbour for trade with India, which put her in a strategic position to import and trade vast quantities of gold, carnelian or lapis lazuli. In comparison, the burials of the kings of Kish were much less lavish. High-prowed Summerian ships may have traveled as far as Meluhha, thought to be the Indus region, for trade.

Exports

edit

Imports

edit

Royal cemetery at Ur

edit

The Royal Cemetery at Ur held the tombs of several rulers of the first dynasty of Ur. The tombs are particularly lavish, and testify to the wealth of the first dynasty. One of the most famous tombs is that of Puabi. The artifacts found in the royal tombs of the dynasty show that foreign trade was particularly active during this period, with many materials coming from foreign lands, such as carnelian likely coming from the Indus or Iran, lapis Lazuli from the Badakhshan area of Afghanistan, silver from Turkey, copper from Oman, and gold from several locations such as Egypt, Nubia, Turkey or Iran. Carnelian beads from the Indus were found in Ur tombs dating to 2600-2450, in an example of Indus-Mesopotamia relations. In particular, carnelian beads with an etched design in white were probably imported from the Indus Valley, and made according to a technique developed by the Harappans. These materials were used into the manufacture of beautiful objects in the workshops of Ur.

Demise

edit

Genealogy

edit
A-Imdugud
Ur-Pabilsag
Akalamdug
PuabiMeskalamdugNinbanda
Mesannepada
A'annepada
edit

See also

edit

References

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Sumerian: 𒈗, romanized: lugal; transliterated: .gal; lugal; lit.'big man'.
  2. ^ The Sumerian king list (SKL) is a regnal list that records up to 139 kings said to have held the kingship (Sumerian: 𒉆𒈗, romanized: nam-lugal) over all of Sumer (Sumerian: 𒆠𒂗𒄀, romanized: kién-g̃i(-r)).
  3. ^ Sumerian: 𒉺𒋼𒋛, romanized: lugal kiški; transliterated: lugal kiški.
  4. ^ Sumerian: 𒈗𒌦𒈠, romanized: lugal kalam-ma; transliterated: lugal kalam.ma.
  5. ^ Sumerian: 𒂗𒆠𒂗𒄀𒈗𒌦, romanized: én kién-g̃i(-r) lugal kalam
  6. ^ Sumerian: 𒉺𒋼𒋛, lit.'énsí'; transliterated: pa.te.si; ensi₂; lit.'lord of the plowland'.
  7. ^ [] Error: [undefined] Error: {{Langx}}: missing language tag (help): no text (help)

Citations

edit

Sources

edit

Bibliography

edit
edit