Welcome!

edit

Hi Ілля Криворучко! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 14:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz (November 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ілля Криворучко! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz (November 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatiana Lysenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz (December 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denys Sylantyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Junior Championships.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Andriy Mykhaylychenko moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Andriy Mykhaylychenko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You may check. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Andriy Oleynyk

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Andriy Oleynyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RiggedMint (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz (January 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kseniya Grygorenko moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Kseniya Grygorenko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 06:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I hope I confirmed the notability criteria of this swimming sportsman. If not, you may decline, I shall do this article better and in proper way. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Volodymyr Lisovets moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Volodymyr Lisovets. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your move to draftspace. I tried to make the article in proper way with notability criteria, but I'm not sure. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Lisovets (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Lisovets (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your recommendations of this draft. I've added some additional information about his life, studying and competing in major sportc ompetitions from Ukrainian and English sources. I think that's enough for a verification of this Ukrainian swimmer. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your recommendations of this draft. I've added some additional information about his life, studying and competing in major sportc ompetitions from Ukrainian and English sources. I think that's enough for a verification of this Ukrainian swimmer.

Moving articles to mainspace

edit

Hi. I was wondering if you could explain why you made this move without first submitting the draft for review? Deb (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. The reason of it is a mistake of making the move from main page to a draft. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Lisovets (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Deb (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I hope that I confirmed the notability criteria of this swimming sportsman. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andriy Mykhaylychenko (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pppery was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
* Pppery * it has begun... 17:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've deleted this page, thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User talk:FloridaArmy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

In reference to this message you left you on FloridaArmy's talk page, you are not an AfC reviewer not to mention there was no article attached to the decline notice. S0091 (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Deb this editor's behaviour is troubling. In addition to the above, they have misrepresented themselves on their User page which you reverted and updated several athlete's articles with unsourced additions. I find it dubious. S0091 (talk) 21:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
What do you mean in simple words, pardon? I misunderstood your second sentence. Sorry for my troubling behavior if what. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why did you leave an AfC decline notice on FloridaArmy's talk page? You are not an AfC reviewer. And now you are trying speedy delete articles for no valid reason. S0091 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I tried speedy delete of my draft articles for no valid reason (if you meant about it) because these articles were not significant for a Wikipedia community and because there were the same articles as mine.
I declined notice because the subject didn't seem for me to meet the notability criteria. But after your revert I understood my mistake of that and promised never to do that. Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for communicating, Ілля Криворучко. I think I understand your reasons but the rules and history are complicated. I don't have time right now to explain so for now will leave you a Welcome message about editing English Wikipedia. Each language has their own rules so what may be fine on one may not be okay another. I will explain more to you about articles like Yuriy Yegoshin tomorrow. S0091 (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Some of the user's comments are clearly machine translations. Deb (talk) 09:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I never use machine translations. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your revent. I shall never decline or accept articles of others, because I'm not an administrator. Sorry for your disturb. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Ілля Криворучко,
Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion. The criteria for speedy deletion are very specific and limited. What you might think is a reason for an article to be deleted may not be covered by the criteria. Once you become more familiar with the criteria, you can consider using Twinkle to tag pages for a review for a possible deletion. But if you are not familiar with deletion processes and the guidelines about them, I encourage you to work on improving articles rather than seeking their deletion.
If you have questions about any of the points mentioned in these comments, please bring them to Wikipedia:Teahouse for advice, support and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I would like to say that I'm waiting for an accept or possible decline of my draft article about Ukrainian swimmer Volodymyr Lisovets, which is declined three times, and I thought to delete speedy this article, but I didn't do that after your piece of advice. Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2022 European Figure Skating Championships, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is an official decision of Kamila Valieva's disqualification in the official web-site of Court of
Arbitration for Sport in here: https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-information/news-detail/article/kamila-valieva-is-found-to-have-committed-an-anti-doping-rule-violation-and-sanctioned-with-a-four-y/ Ілля Криворучко (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know that, but if you read that carefully, you would see that the court specifically states that it cannot rule on matters of medal allocation. All they did was void Kamila’s scores. The governing body of a particular event (like the IOC or the IFS) has to make a determination regarding the medals. Which they have not yet done. Any edits other than to void Kamila’s scores constitute speculation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
But as medals of Kamila are directly depending on her scores, which are annulled, these edits don't constitute speculation. CAS need not rule on matters of medal allocation, because the medal allocation directly depends on scores. As IOC and ISU must execute the CAS decision, the medal allocation will be evident. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Again, until those organizations make an announcement, you cannot speculate on what the outcome will be. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
If those organizations make an announcement not to deprive all her medals tomorrow, you may tranqullly revert all edits in the articles about 2022 Winter Olympics and 2022 European Figure Skating Championships. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Or you can not update articles based on events that haven’t happened yet. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your explanation and recommendations, I shall use your advice in future. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's not how it works, The WP:ONUS is on you to provide an appropriate source which the source you are trying use is not. It is a primary source and as editors we cannot analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize primary sources. A secondary source is needed. S0091 (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ілля Криворучко, I recommend you take some time to read through some of Wikipedia's core policies. The best starting place the Neutral point of view policy, which also points to the Verifiability and Original research policies in the second paragraph. There are many more policies and guidelines but those three will give you a good foundation. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent editing history at Kamila Valieva shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please discuss instead of reverting. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ілля Криворучко, despite myself and other editors trying to explain why your editing is against policies and guidelines and pointing you to policies, you still continue the same pattern thus exhibiting WP:I didn't hear that behaviour. If you continue, you will be blocked. S0091 (talk) 20:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, Ілля Криворучко!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Additional guidance

edit

Hi again, Ілля Криворучко. First, stop placing AfC decline/accept templates on your talk page. As stated before, you are not an AfC reviewer so should not be using the templates and it is misleading so is disruptive. Second, for any content you add you need to provide a reliable source to meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Otherwise, the content may be removed by other editors.

As for articles like Yuriy Yegoshin and Halina Tyryk which you nominated for deletion, they were created before changes in the notability guidelines. Major changes to the notability guidelines for athletes/sports occurred around a couple years ago and it is still contentious. There are thousands upon thousands of articles about athletes that do not meet today's guidelines as they were based on database entries or other trivial coverage. The problem is, there may be sources that exist so they can meet current guidelines. What to do about them is a great debate among editors but for you, know that just because an article exists does not mean it should but they cannot be speedily deleted because they do not meet the speedy deletion criteria.

For the articles you have created that were moved to draft, what you need to do is find at least two reliable sources that have written in-depth about them, like two or three paragraphs in each source. If you need additional guidance specifically about sports articles, I suggest asking at WikiProject Sports or try WikiProject Ukraine. S0091 (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for my disruptive and too principal politics in Wikipedia.

edit

I would like to apologize you for my permanent revents in Kamila Valieva's article in Wiki and for a possible war with editors. I noticed that lots of editors have a different opinion about the situation with medals and disqualification as I have, so I won't take part in editions of the articles about Kamila Valieva, Anna Shcherbakova and others, and also of 2022 Winter Olympics and 2022 European Figure Skating Championships, where Kamila had gold medals before disqualification. I'm sure that the consensus between editors will be reached soon.

Sincerely, Illia Kryvoruchko from Ukraine. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I've reverted some edits on Nathan Chen's page because 3 numbered notes were deleted in the process. So I've re-added those deleted 3 notes + in order to avoid an edit war, I've re-added yours as note 1 for now. :) As mentioned, I don't want an edit war so just wanted to let you know. MovieTalk101178 (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ілля Криворучко, I will say this one more time. You need to cite reliable sources that explicitly support the claim(s) for content you add, that includes notes. S0091 (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!! I noticed that the argument about the Olympic medals in team event exists now, so I don't take part in edits' war. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Ілля Криворучко you need to add a reliable source for all the articles you edited today (ex. Nikita Katsalapov, Victoria Sinitsina, etc.) and anything you add going forward. If you do not, I will revert your changes and request you be blocked. S0091 (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@S0091: S0091, the notes they added are not an issue. Please see Talk:Figure skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Team event#Gold for USA.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Inna Makhno moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Inna Makhno, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inna Makhno (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Alina Chaplenko

edit

Hi, I have moved this to the draftspace. There was no content apart from the infobox, so please work in the draftspace before publishing. I would also suggest going through Articles for Creation, as you previously had. TLA (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Delete this article, because it has a criteria for speedy deletion. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've made proper editions to the draft. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposed blocking of User:Ілля_Криворучко. Thank you. TLA (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A suggestion

edit

Hi again Ілля Криворучко, its up to you but it might be a good idea to create your articles in draft space first then move them yourself to mainspace (article) when ready. To create page in draft space, just type the title in the search bar with Draft: in from front of it (like Draft:Person's Name) and click search. Underneath the search bar, there will be a note: The page "Draft:Person name" does not exist. You can request that it be created, or you may create the page "Draft:Person name" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered. (I added the bolding). Click on the link Draft:Person name and start creating it, then hit publish which will create the draft. Once the draft is ready, whether that is within minutes or days (no need to rush), you can move it to article. No need to submit to it AfC for review. See WP:MOVE#How to move a page for instructions on how to move from Draft to (Article) as Person name (i.e. remove the Draft: prefix). It's easy. I emphasize, you are not required to do it this way. S0091 (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Another option if you do create a new article directly in article space is to place Template:In creation ( {{In creation}}) at the top of the article until you are done working on it, then remove it. S0091 (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Chaplenko has been accepted

edit
 
Alina Chaplenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladyslav Iemelianchyk

edit

Hello, Ілля Криворучко

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vladyslav Iemelianchyk for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CurryTime7-24 I removed your CSD tag because they just started the article and its not even been 10 minutes much less an hour. S0091 (talk) 21:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ілля Криворучко, I added the {{In creation}} template to give you some time to continue to develop the article. Once you are done, please remove it. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@S0091 To be clear, is it OK for the article to be published without information? My understanding is that it is not, but if I'm wrong, then I apologize. I only ask because a long time ago, I created the article Takahiro Sonoda, and it was sent back to draft within minutes of creation for a similar reason. (I think in my case, there was an article, but it either had no cited sources or was considered not to have enough. I forget at the moment.) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CurryTime7-24 see WP:NPPHOUR along with WP:NPPBIG3. S0091 (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@S0091 According to those guidelines, though, it says exceptions can be made in the case of WP:G2, which I believed to be the case at the time of my review. When I first saw the article, the only information it contained was a name and what seemed to be part of an infobox: [1]. — CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CurryTime7-24 take a look at it now that its been given 20-ish minutes. S0091 (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@S0091 Thank you. Just want to affirm that I interpreted WP:G2 in good faith. It was not my intent to step on anybody's toes and I apologize for having done so inadvertently. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CurryTime7-24 I have no doubt your actions are in good faith so no issue as far as that's concerned. Unfortunately this is now the fourth time it's happened to this editor (twice by an NPP reviewer, once by non-NPP and once by an admin). From what I have determined, Ілля generally starts with an infobox and works from there which is not wrong to do but leads to these issues. However, they work quickly so generally within 20 minutes or so, the article is formed. S0091 (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for letting me know. I will make sure to remember this and be more careful in the future. :) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andriy Fedchuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Junior Championships.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!!! 😊 Ілля Криворучко (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

A few words

edit

(Personal attack removed)

March 2024

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 20:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oleh Plotnytskyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIVB Volleyball Challenger Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know about preview?

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kseniya Grygorenko (April 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Lisovets has been accepted

edit
 
Volodymyr Lisovets, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Danylo Chufarov, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://web.archive.org/web/20120914183745/http://www.london2012.com/paralympics/swimming/event/men-400m-freestyle-s13/phase=swm173100/index.html
The official result of the event you reverted. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The above warning was inappropriate. The editor concerned has been warned.  —Smalljim  10:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lyubov Korol'

edit

  Hello, Ілля Криворучко. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyubov Korol', a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Inna Makhno

edit

  Hello, Ілля Криворучко. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inna Makhno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ілля Криворучко. Thank you for your work on Sergiy Bilov. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ілля Криворучко. Thank you for your work on Andriy Oleynyk. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Draft:Heorhii Chyzhevskyi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Lordseriouspig 08:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 13:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ілля Криворучко. Thank you for your work on Rostyslav Kryzhanivskyy. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ілля Криворучко. Thank you for your work on Eduard Reznik. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lyubov Korol'

edit
 

Hello, Ілля Криворучко. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lyubov Korol'".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daria Bilodid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IJF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaroslava Mahuchikh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Vadym Nevinglovsky

edit

Hello Ілля Криворучко, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vadym Nevinglovsky, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadym Nevinglovsky.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Kseniya Grygorenko

edit

  Hello, Ілля Криворучко. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kseniya Grygorenko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaroslava Mahuchikh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kseniya Grygorenko

edit
 

Hello, Ілля Криворучко. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kseniya Grygorenko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply