What bollocks! I come here to change a few clearly wrong statistics that are listed as fact, and my source is not only an official one, but the most up to date one available. It's completely verifiable. Who cares about your Googling methods? The source is a BOOK, not the web. It's called a record BOOK, after all. And the BOOK is published with the NBA's logo on its very cover. It's available in hard copy but not online. Try reading it some time. So why should it come as a surprise that the "same" edits are made when something goes against the official source? It's rather obvious that these things are wrong when they are printed in the authoritative, most recent, and most VERIFIABLE source there is.

August 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Music genre has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Falcorian (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply