Aaditya.Bahuguna

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kamla Nath Sharma (Biography for Wikipedia People) was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BejinhanTalk 03:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Dear Editor, Thanks a lot for your very valuable suggestions. I have according resubmitted my article after pruning it and removing the portions which reflected 'opinion' and narrations. Though I am still picking up the intricacies of editing, I hope that your suggestion has been incorporated. I value your tips and guidance which I hope to receive further in case more editing is required to meet the criterion for inclusion in the encyclopaedia. Thanks a lot once again for the help. Best regards. Aaditya Bahuguna

Nomination of Kamla Nath Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamla Nath Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamla Nath Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Devan Lallu (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma

Hello, Aaditya.Bahuguna. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear FireflyBot, The article on Kamla Nath Sharma has been drastically pruned by me from about 17000 bytes to about 10500 bytes, retaining only the essential parts containing what has been done or written by the named person who is an engineer, Hindi language writer and researcher of Indian Vedic literature demonstrated by published work in Encyclopaedia and journals. I request that the article may please be considered for re-posting on Wikipedia. Your valued opinion is requested. Aaditya.Bahuguna (talk) 14:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for message. I notice that in 12 years you have written little here apart from on this topic. Do you have a conflict of interest? If so, you must disclose it.

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• Much of your text is unreferenced, and the refs that you do give include three of his own books and his publisher's web site, hardly independent third-party sources.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• You should note that your draft was tagged as not only being promotional in tone, but also as a copyright violation or close paraphrase of this page, which is clearly marked as copyright and all rights reserved. Foe legal reasons we don't restore copyright violations.

Not a reason for deletion, but note that headings should use normal sentence case capitalisation.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

@PraxidicaePraxidicae, Thank you for your reply. I have contested the nomination for deletion on the following ground - After pruning and redrafting of several paras, only the material which is substantiated by published evidence has been retained, when compared with the original text of the page existing since more than a decade. The published work or the awards won, and organizations served have to be mentioned, which cannot or should not be considered 'promotion' category. This was earlier brought for 'speedy deletion' and on my request put as a draft for re-editing. The article has been written to mention a person, over 75 years old, who has worked as an engineer, as a writer in Hindi Literature and a researcher and writer from Sanskrit vedic texts - all three different fields. It has been reviewed several times earlier also, with no suggestion to delete. For an engineer references from third sources are difficult, may not be so for a scientist. It was agreed. The wise editors could help me in just deleting the material, which they still think appears as promotional. The other explanations I had given previously also regarding any violations etc. If still the editors are not convinced and insist on deleting it, I think that would be kind of injustice to the old man under reference. Regards. Aaditya Bahuguna. Aaditya.Bahuguna (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae, I had contested the deletion of the article on Kamla Nath Sharma and gave explanation of why the page on this gentleman who has done substantial work in three different fields in last 50 years or so, demonstrated by published work, should not be deleted. Hope, the review is under your kind consideration. Regards. Aaditya Bahuguna. Aaditya.Bahuguna (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma

Hello, Aaditya.Bahuguna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kamla Nath Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamla Nath Sharma (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Aaditya.Bahuguna! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kamla Nath Sharma

Hello, Aaditya.Bahuguna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kamla Nath Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)