Aakim26

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temblor, Inc. (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Temblor, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 19:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Aakim26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 19:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temblor, Inc. has been accepted

Temblor, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Landslide-Susceptibility-San-Francisco.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Landslide-Susceptibility-San-Francisco.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Landslide-Susceptibility-San-Francisco.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Landslide-Susceptibility-San-Francisco.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 16:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aakim26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am kindly requesting to be unblocked from contributing to Wikipedia as I have been trying to post articles with relevant content and proper references. I am not trying to promote and not getting paid for these articles. I am still relatively new in Wikipedia, and since my first contributions are around similar topics so I understand that it might be perceived as that, I was trying to promote. I plan on contributing to many different topics if I am allowed. I am posting articles with great care, and I link my contributions to suitable Wikipedia pages, so they are visible. Also, I also sincerely request my deleted submissions to be restored (or permitted to be resubmitted) as I believe, they are high-quality articles with a valuable matter which was formally missing in Wikipedia. Thank you, I appreciate your timeAakim26 (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Below, you were asked your association with Temblor, Inc. Your answer was a deliberate attempt to mislead us. Your association is far closer than that. Given that you have demonstrated your word cannot be trusted, I am endorsing your block. You have indeed violated Wikipedia's policies on convert advertising. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your association with Temblor, Inc.? 331dot (talk) 08:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC) I really like their mission to help people learn their seismic risk. So I am a fan.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aakim26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have done a summer internship 5 years ago, and I am not affiliated with Temblor, Inc. I didn't believe this constituted conflict. If you look at the articles that I added, they fully comply with your guidelines. I have no intention of covert advertising. Please let me know.Aakim26 (talk) 08:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you believe that you have acted properly, and still claim that you are not affiliated with Temblor, Inc. when it is clear that you are, there are no ground to lift the block, and I must decline your request. In the event that you are unblocked, you won't be allowed to edit about Temblor, Inc., so you will need to tell what it is you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I have done a summer internship 5 years ago" I'm sorry, but this, too, is a deliberate attempt to mislead us. Come on, it's not hard to find that the relationship was greater than this as recently as last year. As you have repeatedly shown you have no intention of being honest with us, I am revoking your talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if you wish to be unblocked. I suggest you'd have a long way to go to regain the community's trust, after working so hard to break it. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Volkan Sevilgen

Hello, Aakim26. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Volkan Sevilgen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Calliopejen1 (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)