Robjwev

COI and tendentious editing

You appear to have a close connection to the subject of the article American Descendants of Slavery that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest.

The fact that you changed your username from “Adosinsurgent” does not resolve any of these concerns. Deleting the pertinent cited additions of others is furthermore a form of tendentious editing and you should not be issuing orders such as “do not repost” to other editors, particularly not in an article where you have a COI.

--‿Ꞅtruthious 𝔹andersnatch ͡ |℡| 01:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Hip Hop Article content and sourcing should be back repaced as you were going to do: Stx elements

Robjwev it is very nice to meet you I am Street Sting from Bronx River in the Bronx NY the land of the Zulu Nation, I come to you humble and respectfully about the legend Ron " Bee-Stinger" Savage, yes Bee-Stinger did create the six elements of the hip hop movement which need to be replaced back in its rightful spot in the lead as it was for the past 5 years. User Piotr Jr. for some reason allegedly has some kind of issue with this hip hop legend who comes from the 1st generation of hip hop and was one of DJ Jazzy Jay (Bambaataa DJ) original crate boys and the name Bee-Stinger was given to him by Chifrocker Buzy Bee back in the days and solidify on Busy Bee's Records and also Master of Ceremony, for this user to come along and take out a part of hip hop that obviously the original MC's whom help start hip hop as well as Ron "Bee-Stinger" Savage, I want to submit this youtube video as well as a few articles verifying Hip Hop Movement/ Ronald Savage -aka-Bee-Stinger and him coining the term 6 elements of the Hip Hop Movement which we all know are two different things then hip hop in one. Here is Busy Bee backing Ron Savage as they are on Sway in the morning officially giving the world the 6 elements of the hip hop movement which I beway coming from the pioneer Busy Bee rather than User Piotr Jr who made it his business to vandalize Ron Savage legacy event deleting hip hop movement which he legally has the rights to the name by the trademark office and he even went on Ron Savage page and deleted every song that he ever made which is all over the internet, he banned me for 72 hours so I could not talk to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Xz50h-u78</ref> for respect for bust bee and to end this that after 5 years of the truth being up on wiki please watch this video that can not be disputed it's coming from one of the very first MC's of hip hop, once again Piotr Jr has allegedly an issue with Ronald, 0000 -o2:18, 13:44-17:04, and so you know Ronald is from back in the days which everyone knows him 7:25-10:20. Here is an article with Jay Z TELLING YOU what the 6 elements of hip hop movement are: https://www.birthofhiphop.com/jay-z-with-dean-baquet</ref>

Here are other refs why this is very important to hip hop, after all, it's been up for 6 years and it's noble and about of history bring clarity to what the hip hop movement stands for people get the 2 mixed up, hip hop movement was never used in an official capacity they just use the word because people came from all over to come see these dj's and mc's with this new trend later called hip hop, the movement came od because people wanted to be apart of this and public enemy laid down the ground for this Zulu member to explain what hip hop movement is based on the civil rights movement in hip hop songs in the '90s and everyone knows Ronald done this, please keep this back in the lead where it belongs and put Ronald's picture back up, you see busy bee vouched for him and Sway in the morning knew exactly who he was and you can see that yes indeed Ronald Made up the term for hip hop movement hands down.

https://www.iamhiphopmagazine.com/news-ronald-savage-the-hip-hop-movement/

https://www.doggiediamondstv.com/ron-savage-busy-bee-acquire-hip-hop-movement-trademark/

https://parkchestertimes.com/ronald-savage-better-known-as-bee-stinger-trademarks-hip-hop-movement

http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2017/may/19/fourth-season-ordered-black-ish/

https://www.spankradio.uk/blog/hip-hop-as-a-culture-6-elements-of-the-hip-hop-movement/amp/

https://www.uupetaluma.org/services/getting-trouble-helping-troubled-kids/

EVERN THE HYPE MAGAZINE RECOGNIZE Here’s the official statement from The Hip Hop Movement founder and trademark owner, Ronald Savage:

https://www.thehypemagazine.com/2017/09/the-hip-hop-movement-calls-for-the-passage-of-the-dream-acts/

The best way to proceed is to write something up with proper sources post on the hip hop talk page and get a consensus beforehand, allowing other editors to have input would override a single editor's objection. Robjwev (talk) 21:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

OK great, yea because 5 years ago other uses help me then and it was approved, so can you help me to since you did a super great job on hip hop, I have all links i put on here that should be enough to make a short thing on Ronald Savage coning the 6 elements of the hip hop movement, did you see the video with busy bee putting his stamp on the 6 elements of the hip hop movement? OK so which talk page do I put this on? I don't know wiki that good, I tried to learn it when I was in college when we did the Ronald Savage article.Street sting (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Post on Hip Hop Talk page I can't help you directly WP:Tag Team but I'm willing to be open minded.It would take more than a couple of editors agreeing to get a consensus. Robjwev (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hounding ?

Dear fellow editor, I'm not sure whether you are WP:Hounding me. If so, please remember that an administrator criticised your conduct towards me at the bottom of this version of this talk page. Thanks a lot, --Rsk6400 (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Dear fellow, that's absurd; my encounters with you make it seem that you have WP:OWNBEHAVIOR If so, please be mindful of your behavior towards other editors. You have no evidence of me WP:Hounding you. IDK that someone sided with you on a content dispute WP:Hounding is a form of personal attack, two different things. We edit on similar pages sometimes, I agree with your reverts or edits, and sometimes I don't; I refuse to censor my input because someone thinks I'm hounding them. There's plenty of times that you intervened in a disagreement I've had with another editor because you had a right to be heard; that same right is available to all.Robjwev (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

I think, it might be helpful to have an example where I showed ownership behaviour. Thanks --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

I took our problem to User_talk:Acroterion#Ongoing_problem_with_Robjwev. Regards, --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Rsk6400 (talk) 07:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Redlining

Re redlining

An academic hypothesis that risk in lending was calculated on the basis of race rather than credit history. 73.100.10.131 (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

If you really think that credit history is all there is to redlining, then you are being willfully ignorant. Much of the rhetoric of those engaged in it is overtly racist- and those are the few not trying to hide it. Tomabird (talk) 01:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC

Please stay off my page and direct all issues related to this subject on the Redlining talk page. Thank You Robjwev (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)