April 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Albuquerque Journal— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Novel food has been reverted.
Your edit here to Novel food was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/, https://topgreenfood.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to LifeStyles Condoms. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Inner Banks have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Inner Banks was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://lifestylesgood.blogspot.com/, https://lifestylesgood.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply