User talk:Radar33/Archives/2011/March

Orphaned non-free image File:Ajl772NonWikiExample.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ajl772NonWikiExample.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Ajl772NonWikiExample.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ajl772NonWikiExample.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Wrapping not working

{{helpme}} Why is my toolbox insisting on wrapping my TraceIP inclusion

Trace IP ( ARIN · RIPE · APNIC · LACNIC · AfriNIC )

even though I have put it in a {{nowrap}} tag, and even included {{nowrap begin}} and {{nowrap end}} in the TraceIP? I've done all sorts of combinations, and I can't quite figure it out. Can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong? Ajl^talk 08:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

As far as I can tell you are doing everything right. Specifically, it isn't wrapping: when I make my screen smaller in an attempt to make it wrap it moves the entire block of IPtrace links down to the next line instead of wrapping sections of it. Maybe your computer has cached the older display and you need to bypass it?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I've bypassed my cache numerous times, and it still wraps the last part of it. To help get an idea of what I'm trying to say, I've made this series of screenshots for you. But you're saying it keeps it all on the same line for you? Odd... What is wrong with me, then? lol Ajl^talk 18:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Nevermind, I got it working. I think it might have something to do with the {{dot}} template. Ajl^talk 20:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Stratch that, it had to do with the various <noinclude> tags. Ajl^talk 20:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

It must also have had something to do with your system and browser verses mine (Firefox on a mac); I could not get it to wrap like it did in your screenshot. I looked at Wikipedia:Line break handling but didn't find anything directly on point, though it does list some specific problems encountered.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I looked at the page's source code (not the wiki source) and for whatever reason, it was placing a <p> tag at the very beginning of the line, then a </p> tag where it broke to the second line in those screenshots I showed you. Ajl^talk 09:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

P.S.: Good to see you again, I knew your name seemed familiar to me. Ajl^talk 12:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Wow you remembered and found that from two years ago! Hey, I was wondering what you meant about the time stamp over at Nativity of Jesus. If I am interpreting it correctly, note that any !votes made before a formal close of a discussion count 100%; the seven day time limit at WP:RM, or at any XfD process for example, sets only a time before which the discussion should not normally be closed, but does not limit the discussion or !votes before the closing takes place even if it's 100 days. This has come up many times and, in fact, I just saw a discussion about this... let me see if I can locate it... ah, Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#7 days? Or at least 7 days?. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. Ajl^talk 01:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

G4 speedy declined at Xantus gabor

Hi, the G4 CSD deletion is only for articles deleted via AfD, not by CSD or PROD. Please read: [[1]]. Jarkeld (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Please take a look at the author's talk page, then let me know which CSD I should have placed on it. Ajl^talk 03:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

A7 comes to mind, but as there might be a claim to notability present, a BLPPROD would not be out of place as it does not cite any sources at all. Jarkeld (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I've placed A7 on it. Ajl^talk 03:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

{{talkback}}

Advice/Comments

Would you mind taking a look at this and making any reccomendations? I also understand if you would rather prefer not to comment, please just say so. – Ajl^talk 08:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

I've also requested some other users take a look at it, with the same "no comment" clause applied to them as well. – Ajl^talk 08:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

The page speaks of "this RfC/U" but does not tell me which one! None of the references remind me of anything I have looked at recently so even if I knew what it was about, I am unlikely to have any comment to make. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

RfC/U Tenmei. I'm also modifying it more, in light of recent discussions on it's talk page. – Ajl^talk 02:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)