Alcibiade1

Welcome!

Hello, Alcibiade1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 21:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alcibiade1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I would like to know the specific reasons why my account was blocked. During my various contributions, I tried as much as possible to be open to talk and transparent about the type of my contributions. That is why I do not understand the reasons for this blockage. If the pages to which I have contributed require modification, let me know. My various contributions have each time been highlighted as a source (links) to confirm the elements added. I remain at your disposal, --Alcibiade1 (talk) 18:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alcibiade1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You are blocked for promotional editing, undeclared paid editing, and sock/meatpuppetry about Qima/AsiaInspection and Sébastien Breteau. To be unblocked, you would need to agree to not edit about these subjects and to describe what other constructive, unpaid edits you would make. As always, any other admin can unblock or modify unblock conditions without discussion with me, though a ping would be nice.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello,

Thank you for the details of the various explanations. In my previous message, I mentioned my transparency in the contributions. And sources to prove the new elements brought to the articles. I remain open to discussion for an improvement of the articles and for my account to be unlocked. My account has been assimilated to others. These have been used previously without respecting Wikipedia rules. On the other hand, my will is to respect its rules. That's why I've always sourced my modifications. And the articles for which I have contributed have as their subject well-known personalities and/or companies in their sector and beyond. Renowned media use their analysis for some reports. My main goal is to find a solution to unlock my account. In addition to the elements mentioned here, my profile provides more details about me.

Thank you for consideration.

--Alcibiade1 (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

"My account has been assimilated to others." Would you mind explaining that?  Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 15:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:QIMA

Hello, Alcibiade1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "QIMA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sébastien Breteau

Hello, Alcibiade1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sébastien Breteau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)