Alex.osheter

List of Israeli films of 2016 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Israeli films of 2016, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Alex, greetings. Please note that stand alone list do need independent, reliable sources just like any other article. IMBD, official web site, home page, interviews, press release, user genearted sites and sources that assoiciate with the subject are considered NOT reliable/independent and can NOT be used to contribute to the notability of the subject. Sources from major newspapers are good. Thank you.. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Callout Culture Article

Would you mind looking at the Call-out Culture article? It's been edited basically down to a sentence or two by Bacondrum. Thanks. -- DeRossitt (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Prod

Hi, please read WP:PROD as a prod cannot be replaced once removed for any reason. Also, I remember this subject had significant coverage in the UK such as the BBC, Channel 4, Guardian etc.If you disagree then please take to WP:AFD, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I saw. Thank you. See my comment :) Alex.osheter (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

• • You cannot add a new prod as per WP:PROD. It has to go to AFD Atlantic306 (talk) 21:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gab (social network); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:11, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Specific provisions in the ARBPIA sanctions that apply to you

All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the above methods. This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, noticeboard discussions, etc. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

I note that there has been at least on complaint about your use of an article talk page, so you need to watch that. Doug Weller talk 12:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Could you please expand on that? What talk page? Whose complaint? Alex.osheter (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Ignore that. I don't have time to go back and check and I'm thinking now I got you confused with another editor. In any case it was probably on Gab, not covered by this set of sanctions. 19:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Not having a good few hours, wrong number of tildes, sorry. Again, you don't have to worry if you follow the above and WP:AGF (even if others don't). Doug Weller talk 10:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. Cheers! @Doug Weller: Have a great day. Alex.osheter (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Welcome. It can take a while to get you sealegs, our rules are Byzantine. Nevertheless, welcome, it's nice when intelligent new editors join the project. E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you @E.M.Gregory:, very much appreciated :)

Thank you

Thanks you Bijnorlion (talk) 16:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Sheridan, WY

Is it inappropriate to include a cultural history assessment of a town in the heading of an article? That's what I was trying to do in the Sheridan, Wyoming article with the cited quote from Kathryn Schulz, instead of leaving the entire intro to demographic data. If you read the cited article from Schulz, the cosmopolitan quote is right there. The cosmopolitan mix of people and cultural influences she describes is fully backed up and cited in the history section below. "The town has displayed what one writer dubbed "a kind of frontier-cosmopolitan chic," since at least 1909, which developed from its mix of cowboy, American Indian, immigrant, and tourist influences." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.157.115 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

The lede is usually reserved for purely objective information that summarizes the article. I'm trying to find a few reliable sources to beef it up because I agree it's fairly short. In the meantime, please feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss it. That way other editors can also see it, and be able to comment and provide their own feedback. Also, if you do, don't forget to finish your comments with ~~~~ Alex.osheter (talk) 21:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you from a former contributor

Hi Alex.osheter,

This is Sean King. I used to be a Wikipedia contributor and I wanted to simply thank you for what you're doing to challenge the strong bias and inaccurate statements on the pages for Gab and Epik.

Administrative Notice Board incident report involving "Callout culture" article

There is an Administrative Notice Board report (which can be found here) concerning Bacondrum's edits to the Call-out culture article. I am posting this notice on the Talk pages of the ten most frequent contributors to the article who have accounts on Wikipedia. -- DeRossitt (talk) 23:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Israeli films of 2016 has been accepted

List of Israeli films of 2016, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TracklistData

Template:TracklistData has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)