Welcome!

Hello, Antonio "Tony" Montana "Scarface", and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Hiberniantears (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sanskrit

edit

Hi, I reverted your move of Sanskrit to Sanskrit language (Indian subcontinent). "language" only needs to be included for disambiguation purposes. Usually languages and cultures have the same name (English, Dutch, Japanese, etc) but there are a number of instances wherein a language has a name that isn't also the name of a culture. Mandarin is one example (though there are still other things that "Mandarin" refers to), as well as Latin. Sanskrit is another example. If you still feel that Sanskrit should be renamed to Sanskrit language, please discuss it in the talk page first where we can reach a consensus. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 19:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Scarface

edit

Template:Scarface has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hnsampat (talk) 02:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

That is irrelevant. Are you an alternative account of 20k? I presumed so because you are just about everywhere that he is.  Asenine  20:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm not. We're best friends. -- SCARFACE 20:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet

edit

We will see when the checkuser case is opened, that will tell us once and for all.  Asenine  20:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I am going to file a checkuser after a review of your contributions. Coming out of the woodwork after weeks of no editing simply to blindly support your 'friend' in a load of discussions is not acceptable whether you are the same person or not. So, do you want to come clean and admit that you are 20K, or should I take it to the next level? J Milburn (talk) 21:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have been mentioned...

edit

...on the incidents noticeboard in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Antonio_.22Tony.22_Montana_.22Scarface.22_and_The_Twenty_Thousand_Tonne_Bomb this thread. J Milburn (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Me...

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antonio "Tony" Montana "Scarface" (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you unblock me, I won't go near The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb again. I'll just go and do my own things.

Decline reason:

You were confirmed as a sockpuppet by checkuser. Therefore, I'm not sure how you'll avoid going near... ermm... yourself... in the future. — slakrtalk / 08:54, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

...Again

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antonio "Tony" Montana "Scarface" (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was here before The Bomb even came into existense. I was being helpful to Wikipedia. When The Bomb came along, he uploaded this image to his page. Then he forced me to help him keep this image up on Wikipedia. Then I went into hiding. Controversy started to build up with The Bomb and then he sent me another email on August 11, proclaiming, "Listen carefully. You can forget all hope of contributing if you don't state that you support me in the WP:PUI discussions. If you don't, watch out! The choice is yours..." Then reluctantly, I had to do it. It was good of J. Milburn to remind me I was mentioned, but I am clearly not a sockpuppet of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. I have been here since February. The Bomb only joined on March 13. Sometimes, Checkuser makes mistakes . . . and this is no exception.

Decline reason:

A creative unblock request, but unfortunately, not a compelling one. — OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Tony Montana, Drug Lord.PNG

edit
 

The file File:Tony Montana, Drug Lord.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply