User talk:Ardo191/Archives/1st Qtr 2007

1st Quarter Archives for User Talk: Ardo191

Archives

Current Archives

2nd Qtr 2007

1st Quarter 2007

Fourth Quarter 2006

Editor review

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/Ardo191/Archives/1st Qtr 2007, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 08:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ardo191! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. froth^{T C} 20:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ardo191! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. froth^{T C} 23:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ardo191! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. froth^{T C} 01:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Re:VP

I check the VP approval list every couple hours and approve all the users on the list who meet the requirements. Apparently the mod tool wasn't clearing your name off the list after approving you. It's supposed to autogreet you and take your name automatically off the list when I give you the OK, but it has problems recognizing certain usernames (I really don't know the details on this).

I guess I saw your name each time I checked the list and approved you each time, and never even noticed that it was the same name! With the last approve, though, it seems to have actually put you on the encrypted userlist and taken your name off the waiting list, so there shouldn't be any more problems.

Sorry for the inconvenience --froth^{T C} 02:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me

thanks for reminding me

i sometimes forget to do stuff like that =) i admit its not a good habit —The preceding and there ya go i almost forgot to sign Maverick423 17:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Lord High Steward of Ireland

Hi, I have seen that you removed a bundle of wikilinks on the article above. Redlinks don't mean explicitly that links are broken, but generally that articles to them don't exist yet. You might wish to read Wikipedia:Redlinks concerning this. Greetings ~~ Phoe _talk 18:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC) ~~

Your help desk query

You probably should not make a page for eye color generator. See WP:WEB for details. --Sopoforic 09:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for it. I feel honoured. Greetings and thanks again. ~~ Phoe _talk 12:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC) ~~

Vista

LOL :) Ok I haven't got the full version of vista I'm running RC2 Beta --Oliver202 12:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

My Help Request

I need to find out what kind of bird this is.. Can anyone help me? Ard0 ^{(Talk - Contribs)} 21:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Please use the reference desk for that. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 21:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Definitely a parrot (psittacine) of some kind. A quick scan of Google reveals a few types of yellow parrots (Amazons, apparently) but I didn't see any that exactly matched yours.

Atlant 00:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Eureka! I e-mailed the Sea World and Busch Gardens Conservation Fund. They said that they were golden conures. bibliomaniac15 02:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

You flatter me. bibliomaniac15 05:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

We can't allow fair use images in user pages

I had to remove the Windows Vista logo from your user page because it violated fair use images rule #9. If you have questions about why this is nessary, you can ask Durin on his talk page. Will (Talk - contribs) 03:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, images like the "Homemade Vista Logo" you made are also copyright infringements, because they look too similar to the original they're imitating (it's the idea that's copyrighted, not a particular alignment of pixels). Therefore, you may not simply put a GFDL tag on it and pretend it's an original image. Please stop looking for loopholes and putting Wikipedia in risk of violating US copyright law. Thank you, Миша13 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Ask a lawyer (or someone at WP:CP or WP:VPP) how far the line goes. But anything even resembling the logo is a possible copyright violation, including 4 straight rectangles, red, blue, green and yellow, aligned in a specific way. Миша13 10:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Microsoft-windows-xp-logo-greyscale.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft-windows-xp-logo-greyscale.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the image...

The image of the Golden Conure you took is now on the Main Page for February 2 for the "Did You Know" section. bibliomaniac15 18:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Windows Vista Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows Vista Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 02:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

i would like to help you clean up wikipedia. my friend, nothing,no, has been vandalizing george bush and i am very mad at him. tell me what i can do!I know who you are 16:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

hi

I have figured out Cornwoman's password it is ** Censored Ard0 ^{(Talk - Contribs)} 17:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC) **. She has been abusing multipull accounts. --Cornwoman 13:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)