Awchamoun91

October 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Also, you, as the paper author, should especially refrain from adding that citation yourself, per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to SHA-2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 19:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at SHA-2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 19:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)