Alexiod Palaiologos

You're invited to the Teahouse.

Hello! Azaan Habib, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Your edit on Spanish flu

Why was this edit which is not stated in any source added Spanish flu? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 07:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Belgian Grand Prix has been accepted

2020 Belgian Grand Prix, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Spanish Grand Prix has been accepted

2020 Spanish Grand Prix, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Azaan Habib/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Azaan Habib/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Signature

BTW you need to update your signature, it still has your old account name on it. Canterbury Tail talk 19:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes I will, thanks for the reminder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexiod Palaiologos (talk • contribs) 19:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serbia and Montenegro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yugoslav and Montenegrin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Further discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Dutch–Indonesian Round Table Conference

Hi. The Round Table Agreement was signed by Syarif Hamid II of Pontianak on behalf of the Federal Consultative Assembly, which was an organization set up in 1948 to represent the non-Republic of Indonesia states in the future United States of Indonesia (RUSI), as well as by Hatta on behalf of the Republic, which would become one component of the RUSI, and Dutch Minister of Colonial Affairs Johan van Maarseveen on behalf of the Dutch. Regards and stay well. Davidelit (Talk) 15:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for a late reply, thanks for the information! User:Alexiod Palaiologos 16:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Army of Condé

added a link pointing to Battle of Biberach

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

No I am not. You randomly decide to revert my edits, and have also been seemingly following me around on Wikipedia for the past month, on various pages. Then you just delete random information and come up with your it's your burden to find information to undo these reverts, as if you somehow control the status quo. Seriously, this is beyond ridiculous. User:Alexiod Palaiologos 15:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

FDW777 is the one that has engaged in multiple edit wars. Please stop. Albertaont (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• Fredericus Rex mein konig und herr (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is a  Confirmed sock of yours. Any appeal needs to address the socking, disruptive behavior, and how you would like to build the encyclopedia away from Black Lives Matter --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Federal Assembly of Yugoslavia

Hello, Alexiod Palaiologos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Federal Assembly of Yugoslavia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Hello, Alexiod Palaiologos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Hello, Alexiod Palaiologos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Federal Republic of Yugoslavia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)