Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DIVINE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please check UTRS appeal #87097 too as my TPA was revoked before. Just to note that most of the users to whom my tagged at COI notice has been found using multiple accounts and has been blocked by CU. About legal threats I have personally apologized user:usedtobecool about my actions and behavior. About their all concerns which they mentioned on AN I have made them clear that I haven’t filed any official complaint against them anywhere and will not do that also you can verify that in my talk page. Also, I request you to note that whenever I get into AN my anxiety level rises too much which I had also mentioned in AN. While user: Bivhuti45 was dragging me off being a sock puppet and was making personal attacks at me, I requested admins to check them out multiple times but finally rogusill has blocked them too due to their UPE and ignoring multiple COI warnings. Also, I cannot deny that I haven’t made mistakes. I Have done many, but I want to contribute further to keep those mistakes in my mind and disclosing all of my previous coi/upe editing which I have done. Please consider my unblock request thankyou. DIVINE 20:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Per the consensus at this AN discussion, the community has declined your appeal and imposed a six-month moratorium on future appeals. Do not appeal your sanction, here or at UTRS, before October 12, 2024. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tech News: 2024-15

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-16

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-17

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-18

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 03:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-19

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-20

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-21

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-22

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-23

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-24

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-25

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-26

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bongkosh Rittichainuwat

edit
 

The article Bongkosh Rittichainuwat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

On second thought, this ought to just be deleted as a non-notable UPE/COI creation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-27

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-28

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-29

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-30

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-31

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-32

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-33

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-34

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-35

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-36

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-37

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-38

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-39

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-40

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-41

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Unblock Request

edit

 
This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

DIVINE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am requesting the unblocking administrator or the community to unblock me because I have understood the cause of my blockage. Why did I get blocked, and how would I have dealt with the situation calmly without providing legal threats already resolved long before, yeah more than six months if I recall it might be seven. I accepted that I was paid to vote for [AFD] and I revealed it myself which helped to block larger PR firms even after I got blocked I supplied information to concerned users and someone who claims to be an invisible administrator which I had submitted evidence long back to administrators.

In the period, I get blocked, I haven't used multiple IDs nor have I edited from any IP or any new ID i.e. CU can verify this humble request first before anyone reviews my unblocking request because, in the past, I have faced many failed SPI requests against me.

Within a pperiod of Six months after getting blocked, I have contributed to SimpleWiki which is kind of similar to Enwiki and I believe I have improved my English skills by learning and contributing via simple English.

To make this request short:

1) I understand why I was blocked and I will avoid those mistakes again and will only submit WP:BLP via WP:DRAFT and will follow further to get unblock from Mainspace WP:BLP in the future. 2) I won't vote in AFD for an additional Six months and request to community later 3) I love Wikipedia thus I have been here for 10 years and I still want to make an effective contribution and help Wikipedia as an individual volunteer once again 4)I have never doxed anyone's identity, but I was the victim of doxing before from few Nepali administrators which I will keep confidential and I have proof of how they misused their power.

Thankyou for considering this request :) DIVINE 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I am requesting the unblocking administrator or the community to unblock me because I have understood the cause of my blockage. Why did I get blocked, and how would I have dealt with the situation calmly without providing legal threats already resolved long before, yeah more than six months if I recall it might be seven. I accepted that I was paid to vote for [AFD] and I revealed it myself which helped to block larger PR firms even after I got blocked I supplied information to concerned users and someone who claims to be an invisible administrator which I had submitted evidence long back to administrators. In the period, I get blocked, I haven't used multiple IDs nor have I edited from any IP or any new ID i.e. CU can verify this humble request first before anyone reviews my unblocking request because, in the past, I have faced many failed SPI requests against me. Within a pperiod of Six months after getting blocked, I have contributed to SimpleWiki which is kind of similar to Enwiki and I believe I have improved my English skills by learning and contributing via simple English. To make this request short: 1) I understand why I was blocked and I will avoid those mistakes again and will only submit [[WP:BLP]] via [[WP:DRAFT]] and will follow further to get unblock from Mainspace WP:BLP in the future. 2) I won't vote in AFD for an additional Six months and request to community later 3) I love Wikipedia thus I have been here for 10 years and I still want to make an effective contribution and help Wikipedia as an individual volunteer once again 4)I have never doxed anyone's identity, but I was the victim of doxing before from few Nepali administrators which I will keep confidential and I have proof of how they misused their power. Thankyou for considering this request :) [[User:DIVINE|<b style="color:#29F">DI</b><b style="color:red">V</b>]][[User talk:DIVINE|<b style="color:#080">I</b><b style="color:#808">N</b>]][[Special:Contribs/DIVINE|<b style="color:#FA0">E</b>]] 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am requesting the unblocking administrator or the community to unblock me because I have understood the cause of my blockage. Why did I get blocked, and how would I have dealt with the situation calmly without providing legal threats already resolved long before, yeah more than six months if I recall it might be seven. I accepted that I was paid to vote for [AFD] and I revealed it myself which helped to block larger PR firms even after I got blocked I supplied information to concerned users and someone who claims to be an invisible administrator which I had submitted evidence long back to administrators. In the period, I get blocked, I haven't used multiple IDs nor have I edited from any IP or any new ID i.e. CU can verify this humble request first before anyone reviews my unblocking request because, in the past, I have faced many failed SPI requests against me. Within a pperiod of Six months after getting blocked, I have contributed to SimpleWiki which is kind of similar to Enwiki and I believe I have improved my English skills by learning and contributing via simple English. To make this request short: 1) I understand why I was blocked and I will avoid those mistakes again and will only submit [[WP:BLP]] via [[WP:DRAFT]] and will follow further to get unblock from Mainspace WP:BLP in the future. 2) I won't vote in AFD for an additional Six months and request to community later 3) I love Wikipedia thus I have been here for 10 years and I still want to make an effective contribution and help Wikipedia as an individual volunteer once again 4)I have never doxed anyone's identity, but I was the victim of doxing before from few Nepali administrators which I will keep confidential and I have proof of how they misused their power. Thankyou for considering this request :) [[User:DIVINE|<b style="color:#29F">DI</b><b style="color:red">V</b>]][[User talk:DIVINE|<b style="color:#080">I</b><b style="color:#808">N</b>]][[Special:Contribs/DIVINE|<b style="color:#FA0">E</b>]] 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am requesting the unblocking administrator or the community to unblock me because I have understood the cause of my blockage. Why did I get blocked, and how would I have dealt with the situation calmly without providing legal threats already resolved long before, yeah more than six months if I recall it might be seven. I accepted that I was paid to vote for [AFD] and I revealed it myself which helped to block larger PR firms even after I got blocked I supplied information to concerned users and someone who claims to be an invisible administrator which I had submitted evidence long back to administrators. In the period, I get blocked, I haven't used multiple IDs nor have I edited from any IP or any new ID i.e. CU can verify this humble request first before anyone reviews my unblocking request because, in the past, I have faced many failed SPI requests against me. Within a pperiod of Six months after getting blocked, I have contributed to SimpleWiki which is kind of similar to Enwiki and I believe I have improved my English skills by learning and contributing via simple English. To make this request short: 1) I understand why I was blocked and I will avoid those mistakes again and will only submit [[WP:BLP]] via [[WP:DRAFT]] and will follow further to get unblock from Mainspace WP:BLP in the future. 2) I won't vote in AFD for an additional Six months and request to community later 3) I love Wikipedia thus I have been here for 10 years and I still want to make an effective contribution and help Wikipedia as an individual volunteer once again 4)I have never doxed anyone's identity, but I was the victim of doxing before from few Nepali administrators which I will keep confidential and I have proof of how they misused their power. Thankyou for considering this request :) [[User:DIVINE|<b style="color:#29F">DI</b><b style="color:red">V</b>]][[User talk:DIVINE|<b style="color:#080">I</b><b style="color:#808">N</b>]][[Special:Contribs/DIVINE|<b style="color:#FA0">E</b>]] 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Tech News: 2024-42

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-43

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-44

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-45

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-46

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply