BEANS X2
|
Welcome!
edit
|
WikiProject Short descriptions
editHi there. Good to see you have joined the WikiProject! Good to have new members on board. I would recommend you add your name to the list on the project page. I hope you can help us to bring down the number of articles without a shortdesc. If you have anymore questions, please do ask. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 13:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi BEANS X2! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
editHello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- You say I
recently edited a documentation page
, which edit was that please? --BEANS X2 (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2020
editHello BEANS X2, and Happy April 1st. You have made a couple of edits to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020/The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2020 that were probably made in good faith, but actually disrupt our work on the article. We are trying to document an ongoing edit war that is considered humorous. Please don't make it more difficult for us than it has to be. Renerpho (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BEANS X2: I am trying to shut the fitishism stuff down, but that's not happening on the page you edit, it comes from the April Fool's Day page.Renerpho (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Renerpho, WDYM? I am updating the section titles and improving readability.
>>BEANS X2t
14:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)- (edit conflict) I only add things to the timeline that actually appeared on WP:APRIL2020. It does not represent my opinion; I am just copying what other people have been saying in the edit war. For example, I couldn't care less about the 'fetishes', I was just quoting Jebcubed in this edit.
>>BEANS X2t
14:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)- BEANS X2 I see! Alright, sorry then.Renerpho (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- NP! I think we all get confused when navigating that page's history.
>>BEANS X2t
15:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)- Very much so!! Renerpho (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- NP! I think we all get confused when navigating that page's history.
- BEANS X2 I see! Alright, sorry then.Renerpho (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- BEANS X2 It wasn't you who tried to stop the fetishisms? Renerpho (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- See my above reply, Jebcubed renamed the section title to
Stop with the fetishes seriously, it's just disgusting
. I just added it to the page. proof>>BEANS X2t
14:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- See my above reply, Jebcubed renamed the section title to
- (edit conflict) I only add things to the timeline that actually appeared on WP:APRIL2020. It does not represent my opinion; I am just copying what other people have been saying in the edit war. For example, I couldn't care less about the 'fetishes', I was just quoting Jebcubed in this edit.
- Renerpho, WDYM? I am updating the section titles and improving readability.
Desktop improvements prototype
editHello, BEANS X2!
Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.
SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 22:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Honestly, I would go to the talk page, if I didn't have to use 'Structured discussions' (ugh)
>>BEANS X2t
10:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
editDear BEANS X2,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
editHi BEANS X2,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
editHI BEANS X2,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editCite Unseen update
editHello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. The script recently received a significant update, detailed below.
- You can now toggle which icons you do or don't want to see. See the configuration section for details. All icons are enabled by default except for the new generally reliable icon (described below).
- New categorizations/icons:
- Advocacy: Organizations that are engaged in advocacy (anything from political to civil rights to lobbying). Note that an advocacy group can be reliable; this indicator simply serves to note when a source's primary purpose is to advocate for certain positions or policies, which is important to keep in mind when consuming a source.
- Editable: Sites that are editable by the public, such as wikis (Wikipedia, Fandom) or some databases (IMDb, Discogs).
- Predatory journals: These sites charge publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy.
- Perennial source categories: Cite Unseen will mark sources as generally reliable, marginally reliable, generally unreliable, deprecated, and blacklisted. This is based on Wikipedia's perennial sources list, which reflects community consensus on frequently discussed sources. Sources that have multiple categorizations are marked as varied reliability. Note that generally reliable icons are disabled by default to reduce clutter, but you can enable them through your custom config. A special thanks to Newslinger, whose new Sourceror API provides the perennial sources list in a clean, structured format.
- With the addition of the new categorizations, the biased source icon has been removed. This category was very broad, and repetitive to the new advocacy and perennial sources categorizations that are more informative.
If you have any feedback, requested features, or domains to add/remove, don't hesitate to bring it up on the script's talk page. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a user of Cite Unseen. If you no longer wish to receive very occasional updates, you may remove yourself from the mailing list.
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
editDear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editEdit Request Tool changes
editHello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)