This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baseball1015 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of John254. Alison somehow made a mistake here like J.delanoy did already.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser-confirmed block.  Sandstein  12:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, J.Delanoy pegged you as MascotGuy, not John254. Using his error here probably won't help your case. —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 06:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Talk page revoked. —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 21:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply