Beauxlieux

Welcome!

Hello, Beauxlieux, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Ryk72 Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 18:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Reply, comment

You've received a reply here: [1] to your query about editing Campus rape.

If you need assistance with figuring on how things work around here, I'd suggest WP:TEAHOUSE is a good place to ask questions. As a general rule, if you go slowly, don't take things too personally and talk things out it'll go fine. Briefly if someone reverts or modifies your edit(s) you discuss at Talk:Campus Rape, and anything that's possibly controversial should be backed by reliable sources ("RS" in Wiki-ese). That should get you started -- it's easiest and best to learn "the rules" as you need them rather than fretting you'll "do something wrong." ("Be bold!" is another classic wiki-ism). NE Ent 23:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Next tip

Squiggleslash removed their own comment: [2]. Obviously I can't speak for them but you could ask them their reasoning on their talk page. To find this type of thing just click on the "View History" tab on the page. NE Ent 00:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the support and the thanks

I'm not reverting my deleted comment because of two reasons: to be honest none of the responses, until yours, apparently understood it, and I'm increasingly aware I say (what I think is) one thing, and everyone interprets it differently. I can't tell if it's me or them, but when it's multiple them it's probably me. Still, compared to a certain admin's interpretation of Berstein's topic ban clarification request, I guess I'm in good company.

The other reason is that one immediate response was from someone who very obviously thought "I don't know this editor, he's not saying something I agree with, can I find a reason to get him banned?"

So... sorry not to be much help. I don't think I'm much good at it. I wish you the best with the article. I think MB can help you even while topic banned as long as he doesn't edit the article itself or communicate with you over Wikipedia's pages (User Talk: or whatever) so you should be OK. And yeah, I think it's utterly bizarre that a huge number of admins are implying they think that people may disagree about whether a violent sexual attack is A-OK if it's done on a University Campus (I know, I know, that isn't literally what they believe, but I feel that's the implication of the decision). I know such an attack in the context of marriage was once controversial, and might still be however horrific that sounds, but on a campus? Bizarre. --Squiggleslash (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Appreciate the nice comment. I guess I'll keep sort of trying :) I wish you the best of luck, the more I delve into how Wikipedia responded to the current onslaught of misogynist slime the more depressed I get... --Squiggleslash (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Beauxlieux! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:07, Friday, April 3, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)