User talk:Bøttle-x

Welcome!

Hi Bøttle-x! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! --みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Tert-Amyl methyl ether

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tert-Amyl methyl ether, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions. I noticed that you added an image to an infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks!  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:38, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not put AI images here

Hi,

I see that you added the "artist impression" onto the TOI-1338 c article. It's clearly made by AI (I mean, look at the swirls when you zoom in), and you didn't put any description saying it was made by AI. Firstly, if you made an image with AI, you must disclose it in the image description. Secondly, AI-generated images are not allowed for illustrating scientific subjects on Wikipedia. Please see the Wikipedia policy for using AI images in articles. Wikipedia is supposed to be a place where accuracy is prioritized. AI does not "know" accuracy when it comes to generating images. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 05:30, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay yikes, I didn't realize you uploaded 4 AI-generated images and put them on science articles. I ask you please stop with this. AI doesn't "know" what's right and those AI-generated diagrams can mislead people, which isn't good. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 05:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I see that you also made an edit to the HD 20782 b article claiming that you expanded the discovery section. The references are completely wrong and link to a completely different article. This is clearly hallucinated by AI. It really shows why AI is unreliable for writing and citing sources. So please, do not use AI to write stuff on Wikipedia. It gets things wrong a lot. Either you must read the Wikipedia's rules for using AI for editing, or most simply, don't use AI for Wikipedia at all. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 05:48, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Ohhh, sorry I've not paid attention to the rules of wikipedia, and I am really new, So I am sorry- very sorry

I promise I won't add any more AI based Info or images Bøttle-x (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm glad that you understand. If you need help or are unsure what to do on Wikipedia, you can always go to the Wikipedia teahouse and ask questions there. The people there are quite helpful from what I've heard! Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 16:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Aww.. Thanks so much for the suggestion!! Bøttle-x (talk) 17:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of internet aesthetics

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of internet aesthetics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Weirdcore aesthetic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weirdcore aesthetic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weirdcore aesthetic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~ A412 ^talk! 17:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Citation error

Hi there. I was reviewing the page you created, Weirdcore. Some of the articles you linked don't use that word. How did this happen? SenshiSun (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

About using AI/LLMs in Wikipedia edits

After I warned you about using AI/LLMs in your Wikipedia edits, I see that you're still using them. As I told you before, LLMs are not reliable for writing. They make up citations that turn out to be completely false, like the ones pointed out in the deletion discussion for the Weirdcore aesthetic. If you keep doing this, you could get blocked. So please, see the Wikipedia policy on using LLMs. Do not use LLMs to do the writing for you. You're supposed to be the one doing the writing and research, not AI. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Also, please do not rename articles without asking others if they agree on it. Your renaming of 55 Cancri Ae / Janssen and Xólotl / HD 224693 b have been reverted. Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative project. You should not make big changes by yourself if you don't know what you're doing. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 23:37, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok I will tell you the truth—

So one day I just searched up Wikipedia on YouTube, and everything was normal, until I found a couple of videos which basically told that you can use an LLM to make the pages on Wikipedia that you cannot find information for easily, or if you are felling lazy.

So I was feeling lazy that day, but I was skeptical of these videos, so I decided to dig deeper.

I open that one of the account that was saying this- and I saw that they were a Wikipedia administrator .I don't remember their name, I think it started with Sj..... I don't know for sure. And they were making videos about documenting LLM usage, so I believed them I thought they are an administrator so they are probably right...and right there was my mistake Bøttle-x (talk) 01:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Another thing, I was lazy that day due to exhaustion from my school work, and I only got my free time at night after working the whole day, and I really wanted the happiness of creating a page, even though I was tired.....

Nevertheless, I can keep telling you this story, but ,I acknowledge knowledge my fault here.

I did not do any more research (because I was tired), and did not go to the Wikipedia teahouse.

At that moment I did not understand what I am doing, but now I do and I regret it.

And I'll also tell you about the pages I created—

Egyptian Hieroglyph U016, TOI-5007 b and Haniya(disambiguation), were not created by an LLM and written by me (I had no work those days, because I was on a holiday), And without an ounce of anger or sadness I'll tell you that Weirdcore aesthetic and List of Internet aesthetics were Written by An LLM.

Again, I ask forgiveness, even though I had used an LLM before and you had warned me(even if I didn't know the rules of Wikipedia back then).

And I am even more sorry for now, for my mistake and clumsy mind. Bøttle-x (talk) 02:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! This is an excellent example of how you should react if you have been using AI on Wikipedia. Not knowing is okay, provided that you stop when learning that it isn't.

Do you remember what YouTube video you watched? --gurkubondinn 06:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry I don't, There are tons of videos on YouTube, and I tried going to see my watch history, but It disappeared from it..... Bøttle-x (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Oh well, it might have been removed from YouTube. If you do stumble upon it again, and you remember about me, could you let me know? It is possible to search your YouTube watch history, but I think it's only available in the browser. At least, it's not possible on the Apple TV client. --gurkubondinn 10:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey!

Could you in some way help me to save atleast one of my pages, Because I even told that Only two of my pages were written by an LLM.

The 'Hallucinated info' in the previous pages that aren't related to aesthetics, is just the info that I thought would be right— sooooo I wrote them in the page.

Look...I am a new user on this platform and I don't know the details and particulars,

And I would be happy if atleast one of my pages survive. Bøttle-x (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Which page are you talking about? It could maybe be moved into your userspace (or copied, depending on the page and what has happened with it). Note that I'm not an admin though, I don't have the tools or permissions to for example undelete something. --gurkubondinn 10:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Oh....It's okay if you are not an administrator, but Thanks for being willing to help me! :) Bøttle-x (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

I can still help, hang on a bit. --gurkubondinn 10:52, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

• Sublimation (phase transition) (at revision 1355204695): this remains in the page history, so you can simply look look at this revision.
• Egyptian Hieroglyph U016: this can't be moved because it is being discussed at AfD right now (and shouldn't be copied for the same reason), but you can save the wikisource in a text file on your computer, and/or download it as a PDF file of the article.

--gurkubondinn 11:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of List of internet aesthetics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of internet aesthetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of internet aesthetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

M kuhner (talk) 03:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes I know, and I don't feel angered.

It was me who told that list of internet aesthetics is made with AI

To @Nrco0e Bøttle-x (talk) 05:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Egyptian Hieroglyph U016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Hieroglyph U016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Hieroglyph U016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

M kuhner (talk) 03:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Weirdcore aesthetic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Weirdcore aesthetic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. GrinningIodize (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nakoda Plast Industries Pvt Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nakoda Plast Industries Pvt Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked from article space

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for persistently using LLM on Wikipedia. This block applies to article space only. You are still free to create drafts and submit them for review, or propose edits on article talk pages. You need to convince the community you are serious about building an encyclopedia for humans, by humans.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then post an appeal to the administrators' noticeboard.  ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 02:56, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TOI-5007 b

The article TOI-5007 b has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

creator acknowledges "making up" material; probable LLM use; pervasive source/text mismatch; no secondary sources

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. M kuhner (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Bøttle-x! The thread you created at the Teahouse, For what can/ cannot we use AI on Wikipedia??, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)