Jade Knight
Nota bene: I clean up my talk page from time to time to keep it easy to navigate. If you find that a comment has vanished, don't worry; it'll be in the page history.
Greetings
editHello. I just wanted to say how much I enjoyed your response here. It was a pleasure to read such a well expressed summary. And thank you for introducing me to Jèrriais, a language I am ashamed to say I had never heard of before. JackofOz 08:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Cymru am byth!
editDa iawn, Jade Knight! Wyt ti'n gwybod am y Welsh Wikipedians' notice board? Croeso mawr i ti yno. Rhion 07:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Jèrriais
editOui-dja, j'pâle un mio d'Jèrriais! J'tais en Jerri i' y a deux ans et j'acatis lé livre d'Paul Birt- et j'm'insîngne d'pis. But, somewhat badly, I have to admit. Et té? Lle wyt ti'n dysgu dy Gymraeg di? Dewrad 01:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
editThe Adopt-a-User Barnstar | ||
Sir, for offering a hand to an apparently delusional psycho who seems to think that he's Tarzan's kid brother or something, and offering your help to that individual when he requested it, you demonstrated a willingness to put yourself out on a limb to help others. It is my sincerest hope that you never come to regret that act. John Carter (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC) |
I regret to say that I haven't actually written much to date, what with the various other things I find popping up, but I intend to, if these distractions ever disappear. One of them right now is the nascent Wikipedia:Accessibility advocates page. It looks like if I'm to be of any use there, I will have to be at least theoretically eligible to adopt others, which means I have to withdraw from the adoptee program. Thank you again for showing a noob some kindness; I only hope that when the situation arises, I will prove up to the task myself. John Carter (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
editThanks JK. I won't let these things deter me, as I truly believe in Wikipedia as a valuable resource. I'll just stay away from that article! - Noisejunky (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC).
Information about Nortmannus
editBoujou (the way we say here in Rouen and its region, still nowadays ) and thank you for your welcome. A-va-t-y tei ? I am not a teacher at the university, but graduated in History and German at Rouen University. I am a professional tourist guide: guide interprète anglais-allemand / guide conférencier, I am living in Rouen. I notice you're very knowledgeable. I share with you a passion for Old English, all the Germanic languages (I learnt Norwegian a little bit ), the Celtic one (I tried to learn Breton ). I was very surprised to read that in Jerriais people said "speak" as in Cauchois, but not as in Cotentinois...Euj pâle paquant itou, eun ptieu seulment. I am not a specialist of the Norman middle-ages, but I know quite well the architecture of this period. Allez, oco boujou cheux tei. Nortmannus (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Ouitchipédie
editHello, I think there is a problem since today in the norman wikipedia. I don't understand why the messages translated in norman laguage by us are not available in the wiki site. Can you see this page (Viqùipédie AllMessages). You can see that the translations are not return in the english version, but we can't see it when we are not editing the pages. I'm not able to explain this problem with the wikipedia foundation or other responsible of the interfaces. Can you help me, please. Can you prevent Man Vyi about it, please ? Thanks for all. Merlicoqùet (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
This morning, all is wright. I don't understand. Have a good sunday. Merlicoqùet (talk) 11:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Jèrriais language
editHello, I'm the new mantainer of the Portal:Language and I've selected your proposal about Jèrriais language for being the language of the month. Regards.--Auslli (talk) 16:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Happy Jade Knight's Day!
edit
User:Jade Knight has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Photograph of "Tapinoma sessile" queen
editYou mentioned in at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tapinoma_sessile that you may have a photograph of a Tapinoma sessile queen. Would you be so kind as to follow up on this? I have an infestation in my home, but in a stroke of inspiration, I though that if I could capture a queen, I could start a controlled farm for my amusement. In any case, pictures of this species of ant's queen seem to be near impossible to come by, so your photograph may be of great use. 65.185.33.147 (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Adopt-a-user
editHi, Jade Knight, just to let you know, adopt-a-user is only semi-active and somewhat obsolete these days, so your best bet would be to just look over Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user and directly reach out to whoever you think could benefit from your help. Alternatively, you could sign up to become a Teahouse host. The Teahouse is a more recent initiative, and it has supplanted AAU as the primary program to assist new users. Thank you for your offer to help new users! Swarm ♠ 22:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Jade Knight. I should have replied to you earlier, but I'm without email watchlist notifications at present, so missed your post. I'm glad Swarm replied immediately with some helpful suggestions. If you think you'd still like to support/adopt users, I personally believe there remains a use for the Adopt-A-User scheme, and it needs people like you. However, I don't think the deployment of templates for potential adopters and adoptees is very effective at present. With fora like the Teahouse, Helpdesk, IRC Channel plus the
{{helpme}}
template, I doubt there's nowadays as much need to give support to new editors via the adopt-a-user scheme as there once was. I'd really welcome your views on the following idea: I'm envisaging WP:AAU being modified so that it's more there for the more committed new editors who want to stick around and learn to edit better, supported by experienced editors with shared interests. So, for example, I've just taken on a 70+ yr old glaciologist who wants to share knowledge about the Antarctic, and his interests and mine coincide, and I'm keen to assist him. Whilst I could work through all the policies and guidelines in a structured manner, I think giving him a single point of contact, a watchful eye, and some mutual support ought perhaps to be more what the AAU scheme could nowadays best deliver. If we tweaked the way the project presents itself, and require newer editors to be more proactive in seeking out a like-minded adopter, I think the scheme could be revived with a new energy and purpose to support committed, enthusiastic new editors who are more likely to stay the course. Obviously, you've had past experience of being an adopter, so I would really be interested to know what you think to this proposal? - If you would like to continue to offer to adopt someone, it would be great if you would add some profile information about yourself to the the list of currently available Adopters. I would see this as the place new editors would eventually be sent to take the initiative and approach an experienced editor for support, rather than relying on the two templates to flag people to one another. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Portals
editThe Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.
There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.
There's a watchlist, of all the pages in the portal namespace, for viewing Related changes.
And more.
You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 14:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much
editThe RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 23:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Jade Knight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
DesCartes listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DesCartes. Since you had some involvement with the DesCartes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PDSMP (alternate account of startTerminal) 18:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
editTen years! |
---|
"Hulled corn" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hulled corn. Since you had some involvement with the Hulled corn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 05:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hope all is well!
editHello Jade Knight! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
"Shortbow" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shortbow and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Shortbow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)