User talk:Cambalachero/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 12

DYK for Claudio Strunz

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2013 Buenos Aires train crash

Hello! Your submission of 2013 Buenos Aires train crash at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

68th Oscars

Hi, there

I just wanted to gently let you know that I addressed your comments regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/68th Academy Awards/archive1.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 02:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Argentine legislative election, 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |align="left" |[[Broad progressist Front

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 2013 Buenos Aires train crash

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argentine legislative election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oscar Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

61st Oscars

Hi, I was hoping if you can give me opinions and comments on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/61st Academy Awards/archive1 as you have done for my other Oscar ceremonies? I would like to receive feedback so I could make necessary improvements. I promise that this will be the FINAL Oscar ceremony list I promote this year (I have one more list left). I would be grateful for the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

novels set in the stalin era

surely Orwell believed he lived somehow in the stalin era. indeed that was part of what bothered him so much. when you say animal farm is not about the politics of the real world - that is untrue. indeed it is only about the politics of the real world at large. its not really about animals in a farm is it. I think the category should be put back . unless the category explicitly states it refers to only works set in the soviet union. Sayerslle (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cemento

Hello! Your submission of Cemento at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DoctorKubla (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for voting to unblock me. Maybe we should let ArbComm know that there has never been a "military conflict" between Argentina and Brazil. That could solve a couple of problems. Hehe. MarshalN20 | Talk 14:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad to see that you have been unblocked. I would advise you to make a list of the topics that you want to work with and that someone may seem as historical or somewhat related to history, and make a request for clarification. All this issue would have been resolved a lot sooner, or not took place at all, if there was a formal clarification "sports are not considered part of history" available. That's what I did, current politics are not history but someone may see them as history, so I requested my own clarification. Have in mind that many users may not have a background in history and may fall in oversimplifications such as "if it mentions something historic, then it's a history article"; try to consider things from their perspective when preparing the list. Cambalachero (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cemento

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Katja Alemann

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Re:Graduados

Great! I've got some portal work to do over the weekend, but once that's done I'll take a look if no one else has in the meanwhile. Miyagawa (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Clarification request

Hi Cambalachero. I filed a clarification request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. Regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 18:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Cambalachero, thanks for the enforcement request notification. I'm debating on whether to comment on it or not. It seems that the more I write on the matter, the greater the grudge becomes, and the more my statements get distorted.

Plus, I'm sure Sandstein and the others will take care of it regardless of what I comment. I mean, I also made a mistake when getting involved in War of the Pacific, and I still got blocked for it despite the matter had become stale after two weeks (and even after I had marked out my statements & disengaged).

Maybe I should just write that one line. I'll think about it.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 16:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Remember that an interaction ban can be reduced to a basic premise: don't talk to or about the other party of the ban, period. There is an exception when a party reports that the other party has violated the ban (which I have just done), but that's basically it. Don't comment on the enforcement case unless the arbitrators have questions for you, and continue the clarification request as if the other party had not said anything at all. At least, that's how I understand the rules. Cambalachero (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for the advice Cambalachero. My interpretations of the rules are always wrong, so I'll follow yours. [:o)}--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 17:38, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm surprised the clarification request has so many participants. It must have been something in the turkey.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 05:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Just let it go. I'm sure that, eventually, the arbitrators will focus again in the original request. Cambalachero (talk) 13:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homenaje, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Almafuerte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mis amigos de siempre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Pérez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Osvaldo Civile

Hello! Your submission of Osvaldo Civile at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias ^talk 12:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tango music

Hello Cambalachero. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tango music, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: it's been move about a bit in the past from this title, which makes it de-facto contested. A RM is a better idea than a straight move at this point. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration motion

This is a courtesy notice indicating that a motion has been proposed by an arbitrator in a request which you are a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 11:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Motion: Argentine History (MarshalN20)

You have made a statement in the clarification request relating to Argentine History. This message is to let you know that a motion amending the original decision has now been proposed. You are welcome to add comments on this motion underneath your original statement. Thanks, AGK [•] 11:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sin código

Hello! Your submission of Sin código at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Homenaje

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 17:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Intérpretes

Gatoclass (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

From Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

"The part that they do not know is the real world identity of the people using those fancy usernames, but no infiltration will help them with that. Unless someone discloses his identity, there is no way to find it out"

It is easy for any member organisation of the UKUSA Agreement to identify a Wikipedia user if they so wish with the minimum of effort. It is basically the same as is used on Wikipedia for a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations#Quick CheckUser requests, with the additional advantage that they can trace the IP address back to the person paying the bill. What is more SIGINT will usually allow them to work out who the user is even if the ISP is in a country hostile to the members of UKUSA Agreement. If they cannot work it out easily then that in itself would be part of SIGINT intelligence that would probably flag interest and hence more effort put into identification. So while one can remain anonymous to other Wikipedia users, it is unlikely that if they so wish your identity would remain anonymous to the members of the UKUSA Agreement. --PBS (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Campeones de la vida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mariano Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hermética, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KISS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Will continue to edit Hermética

I will continue to edit Hermética tomorrow. Sorry for the delay. Leo A. Mercer (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Sin código

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Amendment to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History

The Committee has resolved by motion that:

In remedy 2 of Argentine History, the following text:

"the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces."

Is replaced by:

"(A) the political, economic, and military history of Latin America prior to December 1983 and (B) any other aspect of the history of Latin America that is directly related to geopolitical, economic, or military events that occurred before December 1983. This restriction applies across all namespaces."

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ^{21 Call me Hahc21} 00:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Discuss this

DYK nomination of Mis amigos de siempre

Hello! Your submission of Mis amigos de siempre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AdmrBoltz 00:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Are the One (telenovela)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article You Are the One (telenovela) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 07:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The K money trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Gómez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eduardo Arnold

Hello! Your submission of Eduardo Arnold at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

2013 Rosario gas explosion

Actually, power has been back a few days ago, but as it came and go, I left the banner just in case. I will remove it now, as several days have passed without blackouts. Thanks for the help, and have a nice new year. Cambalachero (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Mis amigos de siempre

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Are the One (telenovela)

The article You Are the One (telenovela) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:You Are the One (telenovela) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 10:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madero Center, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Cruz Province and Jorge Brito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Template:Did you know nominations/Mangrove Robin

Hey Cambalachero! Sorry to trouble you with this, but BlueMoonset requested that you give a more detailed review of my above nom. He said this wouldn't qualify as a QPQ, and seeing that you've used this as QPQ for your nom on Madero Center, I wouldn't like to see you encounter any delays to your nom due to this QPQ issue. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Osvaldo Civile

Orlady (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Argentine history

Hello Cambalachero. I started a clarification/amendment request that may be of interest to you. Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. Regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 02:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2013 Rosario gas explosion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2013 Rosario gas explosion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hermética

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hermética you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2013 Rosario gas explosion

The article 2013 Rosario gas explosion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2013 Rosario gas explosion for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Cambalachero, have you had a chance to look at this yet? I could give you more time if you need it. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Request for clarification (January 2014)

The request for clarification involving you has been declined as withdrawn. For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 20:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Philip II of Spain, English vs. Spanish perspectives

I am reading an interesting book on Philip II of Spain. You're probably wondering why that's important, but just I wanted to let you know that he is a good example on how controversial figures in history can have a dual negative/positive historiography. Even the WP article here mentions the dual perspectives. I wonder if anyone in a future "FA drive attempt" will try to portray him under the perspective of the Black Legend, and claim other perspectives as unreliable. Regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 00:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I'm awar of that. In fact, there are two main groups of historiographic controversies (sometimes they overlap). The first group is when we don't have a very good idea of what has really happened in the past. As in "Julius Caesar did X!" "No, Julius Caesar did Y!" "No, Julius Caesar did x/2 + Y*2!". This happens when we don't have enough primary sources to reconstruct the events, when those sources tell only some info and leave huge gaps, or when the sources can not be completely trusted for some reason (for instance, an ancient battle report written as if the Roman generals fighting against a barbarian country was like a mythological demigod fighting against the orcs from Mordor). This is more common with the historical periods that are more distant in time. The second case is when we have a reasonable idea of the events that took place, but historians do not agree on the significance or interpretation. As in "Napoleon did X, and that's awesome!" "Napoleon did X, and that's terrible!" "Napoleon did X, but who cares?". Ultimately, those controversies are basically pointless, because historians tend to judge things with the ideas of their time and context, and do not fully try to understand the historical figures in their own context. A governor facing a severe crisis or fighting against a coalition of stronger countries may be forced to make questionable actions, and it is very easy to condem such actions when someone has never seen such a crisis personally. It's easy to be a champion of ethic codes and good governance when someone is writing in a computer in the comfort of his house, and the closest thing to governance that someone has ever done was to play "Sim City 4". Cambalachero (talk) 02:44, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Very true.

Historiography is perhaps the most difficult concept to grasp in history. It requires the historiographer to have read as much of the literature on the subject as is available during his lifetime (and in multiple languages).

I remember, in another Wikipedia, getting involved into a minor discussion over the usage of sources by language. Luckily, the "my language only" position did not prevail in that case.

I don't think anyone who might even dare consider himself a historian (amateur or professional) can make such an irrational case. Why, then, do all the top doctorate programs in history require knowledge of multiple languages? Is it not for practical reasons, or are they simply forcing it as a requirement for fun?

The questions are rhetorical, of course, but they are still worth pondering about, especially among us editors who focus on subjects relevant to the rest (non-English, or English as Second Language) world.

Regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 07:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hermética

The article Hermética you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hermética for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Madero Center

Orlady (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hermética

The article Hermética you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hermética for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 20:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2013 Rosario gas explosion

The article 2013 Rosario gas explosion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2013 Rosario gas explosion for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Somos familia

Hello! Your submission of Somos familia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Eduardo Arnold

Orlady (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The K money trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raúl García (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volturian (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volturian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Cambalachero! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek: Defiant (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Trek: Defiant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Adding spam links to articles

Please don't add spam links to wiki articles as you did at Página 12.[1] The links you added were to an expired domain which then passes users to other sites using URL redirection. Burrobert (talk) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek: Defiant (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Trek: Defiant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 13:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultimate Universe (2023) has been accepted

Ultimate Universe (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek: Defiant (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newystats was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Trek: Defiant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volturian has been accepted

Volturian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leandro Zdero has been accepted

Leandro Zdero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

On your revert at WP:NMUSIC

The text of WP:PGBOLD states that Consequently, you should not remove any change solely on the grounds that there was no formal discussion indicating consensus for the change before it was made. Instead, you should give a substantive reason for challenging it either in your edit summary or on the talk page; note that it gives an explicit proscription of reverting without opposing the content of the edit in all cases, regardless of how substantial that edit was. I'm not going to edit-war over this, but don't do this again. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 02:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Front for Victory

Hi

Do you have source for Front for Victory's seats (58) for 2003. For example, a part of PJ was with Menem and Saá? Panam2014 (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decree 70 2023 has been accepted

Decree 70 2023, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rkieferbaum (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Rodolfo Barra

I noticed you added a template to the article Rodolfo Barra. I created the article and agree it focuses too much on specific incidents in his past but I only read basic Spanish. There's very little English coverage of Barra and I'm very unfamiliar with Argentine politics. If you are willing to improve the article, I'd really appreciate it. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Argentine biography - Saturnino José Rodríguez Peña

Greetings Cambalachero - This Saturnino José Rodríguez Peña article that you created on 13 March 2013 is un-referenced and an orphan article all these years. Today I tagged PROD, but hoping you might help improve. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Decree 70/2023 has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Cambalachero. I've nominated Decree 70/2023, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. Mach61 (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Star Trek: Defiant has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Star Trek: Defiant. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Star Trek: Defiant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!