CardGameOrganizer
Speedy deletion of 24 Trading Card Game
editA tag has been placed on 24 Trading Card Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 16:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page World of Warcraft Trading Card Game do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Gazimoff 09:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Fritzpoll (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
The block is indefinite, so it can be undone if you can agree to edit constructively. Spamming articles with links to a website that, from your username, you seem to have a very close attachment to is not acceptable, and I have blocked you for now in order to prevent further addition of these links Fritzpoll (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I received your e-mail and its accompanying promise of constructive editing. I would prefer input from other administrators, however, so I suggest using the unblock template with your agreement to edit constructively in the future. Please have a look at WP:SPAM if you were unsure about our policies regarding this. In case you are unaware, to request an unblock, simply type {{unblock|your reason here}} when editing this page. Best wishes, Fritzpoll (talk) 08:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)