User talk:Catfish Jim and the soapdish/Archive 22

Archive 15Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AndrwscAnetodeGoldenRingJzGLinguistAtLargeNehrams2020

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
  • Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

Problem with your custom signature

Hello, I'm sending you this note because you need to update your signature. You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Your signature does not link to your account. This is usually because your account has been renamed.

To fix your signature, you need to find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences and either blank it or change the link to your current account name. More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. mw:New requirements for user signatures/Help#Wrong user links. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


DJ Sackmann Page Deletion

--Garysays (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Hi Catfish Jim and the soapdish, I have been working on getting DJ Sackmann's wikipedia page back up and I am ccurently trying to figure out why it was deleted in the first place. I saw your name in the deletion logs and was wondering if you could provide some insight on this matter?

Thank you, Garyssays Garysays (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The deletion discussion is here... Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. J. Sackmann
Essentially there's a question of notability. Have a look at WP:GNG. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  TJMSmith
  Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

  Interface administrator changes

  AmandaNP

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 28 March 2021

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration


Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Abdulrahman Elsamni

Deletion review for Abdulrahman Elsamni

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Abdulrahman Elsamni. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Amir Khan (Pakistani Anchor Person)

Please renew my page it's authentic and we have given citation as well so please review it. adding some references here. [1] [2]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021



Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnchanterCarlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration


Edit warring and abuse of mod tools

Hello, I see you're editing warring against consensus over at Thor and related articles to include a talk page—and then you've protected the page to your preferred version, lol. Consider this a warning to stop, self-revert, and use the talk page at Talk:Thor. :bloodofox: (talk) 21:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. :bloodofox: (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

 
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Thor) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 00:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
With 3 reverts, normally a warning might do instead, except that was a pretty egregious misuse of your admin tools, and I consider that a pretty big aggravating factor. You're either an admin on a page, or an editor. You can't be both, and protecting to your preferred version (I saw your claim you didn't have a preferred version, except your behavior shows that you do) is one of the worst misuses (second to blocking your opponent) you can make. I assume that was a one-off. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
I've unblocked, based on the reasons here. It's a shame that realizing that editing WP to blow off steam after a truly shitty day is unwise is almost always a very public realization. I'm sorry to hear about your cat, that's terrible. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou both.

Infobox discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 07:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)