Warning

edit

Your editing is being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User CejeroC disruptively editing. You must respond by either never adding color_process to an infobox or by discussing the issue at the link given. The edits are causing disruption and you will be blocked if they continue. Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@CejeroC: Sorry about the problems but for reasons that none of us understand, people using the Wikipedia app may not be able to see messages that are left for them, and may find it hard to respond even if they do see such messages. See WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU. It is unfair to people using that app if they are blocked, but it is also unacceptable that other editors are unable to communicate with such users to discuss problems. Please read the first link above to see what has been said. Johnuniq (talk) 00:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

don't block Manero6 (talk) 05:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  signed, Rosguill talk 03:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
CejeroC, Communication is required on Wikipedia. Other editors have been trying to point out mistakes in your edits and you have been ignoring them. You have also made positive contributions, and we want you to continue editing Wikipedia, but if you are not able to work constructively with others you will lose your editing privileges. Manero6, if you are the same person using multiple accounts, please stop doing that and stick to one account. See WP:MULTIPLE for more details on our account policy.signed, Rosguill talk 03:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Please note that I'll be happy to lift the block once you can demonstrate that you are willing to engage with other editors and work together constructively. signed, Rosguill talk 15:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply