Cindy Jutras
Hello, I'm Bri. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Acumatica have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018 - Acumatica
editHow do you figure this merits removal of the COI and advert tags on Acumatica? All you've done is added even more company-speak to the article. If you want to actually improve it, please find independent reliable sources about something substantive. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
How do you figure this is "company speak"? I am not with Acumatica and purposely removed any obvious self-promotion. The only links I added were references to announcements and linking to their partners. How is that "company speak" What kind of citations are you looking for Cindy Jutras ----
You do realize this is an article describing the company, right? Before I edited this I looked at other similar pages for other software companies like Acumatica and purposely modeled them. I am an independent (reliable) source - I am an industry analyst that covers all these companies. Again - give me an example of a citation you would find acceptable. ----
Cindy Jutras, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Cindy Jutras! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
Why are my edits removed?
editI made a series of edits on a page about a company. I am not employed by the company. I removed self-promoting pieces and marketing-speak. I have done editing twice and both times, Brit reverted back to the page before my edits. I have not violated any copyrights and I have no bias. The implication is I can't add something about the company, but this is a page DESCRIBING the company.