Welcome!

edit

Hello, Corprelations, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beagel (talk) 18:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

AusNet Services

edit

Hi there 'Corprelations' (Sorry!) Jotrel,  
I have added information to the AusNet Services page about their 'legal issues' relating to the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires. I thinks it's very well referenced with reliable sources, including using the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission final report. I hope you think I have been fair, and encyclopaedic, though I certainly think the page does need expansion with other information. It only had one source, which is 'affiliated' it as its from their website. Independent sources are much better.

As you are, apparently, closely connected to this topic, I would strongly suggest that you do not edit that page, thus avoiding even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Instead, go to the talk page (Talk:AusNet Services)‎ and discuss any issues there.

You can use {{ping|220 of Borg}} there to notify me of any messages. Regards, 220 of Borg 11:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply