User:Troutfarm27 Home User talk:Troutfarm27 Talk User:Troutfarm27/Email Email Special:Contributions/Troutfarm27 Contributions User:Troutfarm27/Awards Awards



Crypto.com Arena

edit

Well no need for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolaloud125 (talkcontribs) 20:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Lolaloud125: Hi there. I just thought it was best to keep the wording concise, especially since we're dealing with the lead paragraph of the article. No ill intent obviously and I greatly appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia so far! Troutfarm27 (Talk) 07:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Player categories

edit

Please don't add player categories until they appear in a regular season game with that team.-- Yankees10 03:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Yankees10: Whoops! My bad. Thanks for letting me know. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 04:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

You

edit

hi I'm georgegod245 I just wanna say u seem like a great user on Wikipedia! you make Wikipedia a better place! tyty Georgegod245 (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

also let's go Lakers!!! Georgegod245 (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

eon337

edit

Hi. Is this someone that used to go by Rahfu? If not, terribly sorry for bothering you, but if so, I've heard you know something about an old Neopets user called eon337. I'd like to hear what you know about them, and I'd like to share what I've found with you. Can we talk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theredglowbox (talkcontribs) 07:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Theredglowbox: I think you got the wrong person. I've never played Neopets before ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Good luck with your search though! Troutfarm27 (Talk) 08:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, in retrospect, don't think you'd recognize that even if you were them. I'm talking about eon337/"Jenny", creator of the longest text ever. Just double-checking, are you sure you aren't the person named Rahfu in the comment section of this YouTube video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57N0u4b5M_Y RedG (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Theredglowbox: Negative. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 08:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hm. Well, sorry for bothering you. I was following an old, deleted draft of a Wikipedia page on Jesse Ridgway. I know that person worked on that page late 2016-early 2017, and you were the only person I could see interacting with the page in that timespan. Maybe I just didn't read the logs correctly. Thanks for the response. Seeya. RedG (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your edit on ITN/C

edit

Excuse me, Troutfarm27. Why? --PFHLai (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's reverted now. I assume it was a mis-click. Let me know if you find any issues with my comments. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 23:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@PFHLai: Sorry about that. I work a little too fast sometimes and happened to misclick in that case. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 23:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries. It happens. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 23:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Geezus Christ

edit

Have you checked his IMDB??? 2600:387:8:F:0:0:0:7F (talk) 02:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

IMDb is not a reliable source. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 02:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wait

edit

so wiki’s a reliable source now??? Huh??? 2600:387:8:F:0:0:0:7F (talk) 02:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

No. Any website that allows content to be edited by anyone (like IMDb and Wikipedia) are not considered reliable sources. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 02:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
point proven 2600:387:8:F:0:0:0:7F (talk) 02:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP drive award

edit
The Reviewer Barnstar
This award is given to Troutfarm27 for 60 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:54, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Award

edit

The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award

For your 360 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Award for 2020

edit

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll take em. Thank you so much! Troutfarm27 (Talk) 03:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Frances Metcalfe Wolcott

edit

Hello, Troutfarm27,

Please look at an article's page history for tagging it for deletion. The only reason this page was an "empty article" is because another editor blanked the page which is not an appropriate reaction for when you disagree with a redirect. The page should be nominated at WP:RFD, not blanked. So, I reverted the edit and didn't delete the page. I just wanted to let you know why. Some times, you need to look into an articles history and not just take it at face value of its current appearance. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that! Slowly getting back into NPP after a short break so I'm shaking off the cobwebs. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 08:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Backlog Drive Award

edit
The Invisible Barnstar
This award is given to Troutfarm27 for collecting more than 5 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

NPP Award for 2022

edit

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deserving of title.

edit

As discussed many other times. Acuña is definitely deserving of the title world champion. The point of him not being on the post season roster is insane. In the same breath we have jake odorizzi listed as a champion for the Astro's when he never appeared in a post season game with them but did with the Braves.

It’s crazy to me acuna being listed a champion was and is watched so carefully and closely but jake odorizzi page isn’t and has be like that for some time. Stop the bull crap and just add it to acuna’s wiki obviously this is biased and flawed. If the player gets a ring that has the words champion on it from the team how can wiki writer say otherwise? 76.238.229.186 (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well thanks for bringing up Jake Odorizzi's article up, I went ahead and fixed that. We're not disputing the fact that they get/deserve a physical ring, but that's just how things go here on Wiki. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 07:12, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Super Bowl LVII

edit

Out of curiosity, why did you upload a larger version of File:Super Bowl LVII.svg? SVG are scalable by themselves (hence the name Scalable Vector Graphics), so I don't understand the idea of increasing the size. Elisfkc (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Elisfkc I know the SVGs can be scaled once they're on an article but I thought it looked too small when you click on the actual file page and look at the preview. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 01:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Minor mistake on your behalf.

edit

Sorry mate would you mind undoing your revert of my change to babytron wiki? As it has been confirmed that is his conformation name during his arrest. Bartholomew Dinglenut VII (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bartholomew Dinglenut VII I'd be happy to do that if you can provide a source. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 22:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Van Duren state prison have confirmed the full legal name of "James Edward Bartholomew Johnson III" in his arrest details.

I would like to update Wikipedia users on his situation and sincerely hope you will consider overturning your decision, thank you. Bartholomew Dinglenut VII (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bartholomew Dinglenut VII Any link online? Troutfarm27 (Talk) 23:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Rab Sports

edit

Hello, Help me on improving my page Rab Sports than having it deleted.

What do I need to do, please? 197.239.12.18 (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The primary issue with the article is if it meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. In other words, per the notice above the page, you need to show that it is notable by providing "reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention." If you are unable to do that, then unfortunately the topic may not be notable enough to qualify for its own Wikipedia article at this time. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 17:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm new on Wikipedia

edit

{{Help me}} Mniak2 (talk) 01:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Mniak2: I'm turning off your help request for now. Either you intended to ask for help from Troutfarm27 or you misunderstood what the template is for. When you ask for help, please make a statement about what you want help with. Empty help requests do not move things along. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sportskeeda

edit

Hi, I'm kinda new to this and just wanted to ask about whether you thought sportskeeda was a reliable source? I'm not sure if this is the right place to do this either so sorry if it isn't. Thanks Fulankf (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. You can check out what other people have said about Sportskeeda here. Personally, it's a bit of a mixed bag because some of the articles on there are written by their own writers and are well researched and fact-checked, but other articles on there are either covering unencyclopedic topics or written by outsiders without as much vetting. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 02:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot. I found the perennial sources page here and its been really useful. Thanks for your respsonse. I don't think my article was a good source, probably cyclical. Fulankf (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peter Shitshow

edit

Have you ever watched an episode of the Peter Shitshow? 184.177.15.70 (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey

edit

I will drink my coffee watching white americans earising and getting f d everyday in your country. You will extinct in this century hopefully. I'm glad I fd some of your rtd women. 176.55.36.148 (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

buddy

edit

Stop changing the tre mckitty thing its 100% correct 64.183.38.243 (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support it with a reliable source and I'll leave you be. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 18:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
The Reviewer Barnstar
This award is given to Troutfarm27 for collecting more than 50 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

NPP Awards for 2023

edit

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
The Working Man's Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Troutfarm27 for collecting at least 10 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Boooo

edit

You suck, put my slogan back Tossell. .1 (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zest

edit

Hello thank you for rechanging it I was mearly adding a new term I had heardbut had not dived into its accuracy im glad my mitake was caught so it would not make false information thanks - 98.152.103.226 (talk) 18:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Trouted

edit

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Thanks for correcting the "was" on Ippei's page + providing the reason why. Grammatically, that makes a lot of sense. You did the right thing, but trouting you seemed amusing -- thanks again :) I still have plenty to learn Col99100 (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

What was inaccurate about the changes to welfare in China?

edit

You reverted it...I notice you mainly do reversions and you seem to be against human rights. Why? 198.212.199.195 (talk) 18:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edits weren't sourced + removed properly sourced materials. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 18:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
The Working Man's Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Troutfarm27 for accumulating at least 10 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:AfreecaTV logo.svg

edit
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:AfreecaTV logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply