DalkeyArchive

Please don't create articles with no content. That fact that your company publishes a book does not mean that it deserves an encyclopedia article. Please also read WP:COI. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I was adding content to a book title linked from another article in red. I thought that meant the article was already created but lacking content, so I was just adding the category. I guess I misinterpreted that.

I really don't think we need that category at all. I see no encyclopedic use for such a category. Why would anyone find such a category useful? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Dalkey Archive, being a nonprofit publisher of largely overlooked fiction, has something of a following that might want to learn more about specific books for the sole reason that Dalkey published it.

I can't see it myself. It looks to me as if you are trying to advertise the company in a slightly more sophisticated way that usual Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 22:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)