Daxemile

Speedy deletion nomination of Making Money with Articles: Niche Websites

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Making Money with Articles: Niche Websites, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Making Money with Articles: Niche Websites and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clickbank Affiliate Loophole

The article Clickbank Affiliate Loophole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

How-to guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Clickbank Affiliate Loophole

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Clickbank Affiliate Loophole, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cbaffiliateloopholebestbonus.com. As a copyright violation, Clickbank Affiliate Loophole appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Clickbank Affiliate Loophole has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Clickbank Affiliate Loophole and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Clickbank Affiliate Loophole with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Clickbank Affiliate Loophole.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Making Money with Articles: Niche Websites

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Making Money with Articles: Niche Websites. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Clickbank Affiliate Loophole. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 18:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Clickbank Affiliate Loophole. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 18:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Website monetization. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 18:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Your edits

You seem to think of Wikipedia as something that it's not, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not your own personal soapbox nor is it a platform for free advertising, the next time you add a spam link to Wikipedia or create another inappropriate page you will be blocked from editing. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 18:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Dank (push to talk) 19:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)