Design + Marketing

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stockland Green Hills has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stockland Green Hills was changed by Design + Marketing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93027 on 2018-05-09T00:19:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui ^雲_水 08:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Design + Marketing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I believe the reason we have been blocked is incorrect and I ask for reconsideration. We are a graphic design company and the owner of Stockland Green Hills is one of our clients and has asked us, as part of our service, to update the facts on their page and to inform the public about their recent renovations. The information is factual and is not considered adverting or spam. Thanks for the consideration.

Decline reason:

Firstly, your use of "we" suggests that this is a shared account. That's not permitted. Secondly, you have edited Wikipedia as a paid contributor without the necessary disclosure. That violates the Terms of Use. Thirdly, the username is the name of a company. That's not permitted, and you haven't addressed it. Fourthly, Wikipedia is not a publisher of press releases. The content you wrote was blatantly promotional and not based on any independent sources. I also doubt it's factual. "a somewhat startling fact emerges that most shopping centre experts in Australia would find difficult to believe." - did you conduct a survey of Australian shopping centre experts, or how else can you claim to know what most of them find difficult to believe? "nothing has been spared in the $414 million redevelopment" - That's factual? Do they have golden taps and marble sinks in the restrooms, or have those been spared? Those are just two examples of a long, long text that was entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 01:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Actually, it is spam. Actually, you need to read and heed WP:PAID and you have a WP:COI. It is incredibly unlikely that we will agree to allow you to edit in this matter. What other edits would you like to make? How else will you help to improve Wikipedia, the world's larges free-content encyclopedia? All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)