Ducky3926

October 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Draft:Sandbox— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sandbox with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ducky3926

A tag has been placed on User:Ducky3926 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. INeverCry 01:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to User:FreeRangeFrog, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but your edits in general suggest that at best you're here to use Wikipedia as a webhost for your stories and at worst, you're just here to make general mischief. Wikipedia is not a place to host your stories or things that you came up with one day- there are various websites out there that would be more appropriate for this and I encourage you to seek them out. Figment and Scribd are both excellent places to start. Other than that, making general posts saying that someone should cite the frog (as in the amphibian itself) for a photo on someone's userpage is just plain silliness and while some silliness is all fine and well, it seems that your sole purpose for being here is to be silly and not make any constructive edits. Like the writing, there are better places for this sort of thing and Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to make these types of edits. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)