Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! ElectricTranquils, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for answering my question.

How do I go about experessing what I discovered in a way people can lookup other articles to compare knowledge?

Like the Josephus story about Babel when the languages were changed and comparing the gods and goddess in every religion proving their the same but known in different languages.

Also that the creator has a different name in every language.

Also that I can prove GOD ARCHANGEL LORD ZEUS, is the lord of the King James Bible and that the Hesiod and Homer stories stating that the Greek gods staying there were born islands, and caves, like lord zeus being born in dikasian cave, are cover up stories of the 4th generation king lord zeus who failed as a king. ElectricTranquils (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not the venue for your offering. It is not structured to be a place where original ideas are published. What you are describing must first (1) be written up in newspapers, magazines, and/or other independently published sources (we call these primary sources), and then, best (2) if those sources are then used for a more comprehensive published sources, such as review articles and book chapters. In short, the policy WP:Original Research does not allow first presentation of new, original insights and editors (whether in religion, science, history, or current events), and WP:VERIFY prevents us from presenting material that is not sourced. If your discoveries are noteworthy, they should appear in these other sources, after which, an article might be appropriate here. I hope this clarifies why your submission cannot appear here. Best holiday wishes. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply