User talk:Eluchil404/Archive8

Your eyes perhaps...

Based upon recent discussions in several places, I have begun work on an essay that seeks to clarify just how and when discussion of a film-before-it's-been-filmed might per WP:FUTURE merit inclusion in some manner, or per WP:GNG and WP:SPLIT might even merit a seperate article. A comment a recent AFD got me thinking of WP:EVENT might apply to a film's eary production in relation to WP:FUTURE and WP:GNG, and the question "Has the production of the film generated multiple, non-trivial news stories? In other words: Does the film already satisfy the primary criterion?" This inspired my essay and its attempt to perhaps address an ambiguity from WP:NFF in the same manner considered when WP:NF was first being created.[1] You were its principle architect... so please look over User:MichaelQSchmidt/Future Films and offer your insights. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

THIS is coming along nicely.[2] Any edits you might make to correct typos or flow would be apprectaited. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

a related discussion

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Future films#Proposed ammendment to section on Process#Notability Your comments toward my attempt at clarity are quite welcome. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the Olympic class Starship loss

I see they closed it as a redirect. You might want to look at what I've been fighting here Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 May 18, where we have a fictional character who was a star of 3 TV shows, lasted 7 seasons on TV combined, had 2 Happy Meal made of her toys, comics AND a video game, as well as having about 30 sources, many of them from reliable third party sources, and people still want it deleted. Mathewignash (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:AE#MarshallBagramyan

Dear administrator,

I am not really sure if you are an administrator at AE or not, but I am posting this message anyway since I found your name among the decision-making administrators in AE cases. If it's not too much to ask, could you please review the AE case on MarshallBagramyan? The whole case is based on an imposed indefinite restriction for not labeling authors any names or dismissing them based on their nationality, place of birth or publication, ethnic group, religion or similar general characteristic (and the report clearly said “This restriction is to be enforced by blocks or other discretionary sanctions”) and violation of another topic ban earlier in 2010 when the user violated his ban twice and went unnoticed? The reported user MB has taken this report out of context by posting long blocks of replies which had already wrote last time he was reported and diverting the attention of the readers and administrator away from the subject which is an imposed ban and his violation of it. All I am asking is for administrators to take action on the violation of restriction for fair and just decision. Angel670 talk 17:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

FYI

You recently opined here; this note is to advise you that this section has been closed in lieu of discussing each situation below the linked section individually. –xeno^talk 16:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Eliz

You were the closing admin on the AfD of this up-and-coming/not yet artist; not sure where to report the page User:Elizabeth Marie Camacho, but I'm vaguely sure that such promotional user pages are not permitted. Dru of Id (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Red Link Recovery

Hello. As a Italian-speaking WikiGnome, I'd like to solicit your help in testing a new tool. For a few years now, the Red Link Recovery Project has been using the Red Link Recovery Live tool to track down and fix unnecessarily red links in articles. Recently, the tool has been expanded to work on non-English Wikipedias. A small set of suggested fixes for red-links on the Italian-language Wikipedia have been prepared and I'm hoping to interest some Italian-language speakers (such as yourself) to work through them.

If you are interested, please visit http://toolserver.org/~tb/RLRL/quick.php?lang=it. Each time you refresh the page you'll be presented with three new suggested fixes. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the tools talk page. - TB (talk) 20:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)