User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2018/Nov
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Epicgenius. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Reminder
Roll-out Template:Cite NYCS map. epicgenius (talk) 02:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Bumping thread for 30 days. epicgenius (talk) 02:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of September 2013 New Haven Line Power Outage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article September 2013 New Haven Line Power Outage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/September 2013 New Haven Line Power Outage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kb03 (talk) 13:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Editing News #2—2018
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscription list on the English Wikipedia
Did you know?
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has wrapped up most of their work on the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual diff tool. The team has begun investigating the needs of editors who use mobile devices. Their work board is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are fixing bugs and improving mobile editing.
Recent changes
- The Editing team has published an initial report about mobile editing.
- The Editing team has begun a design study of visual editing on the mobile website. New editors have trouble doing basic tasks on a smartphone, such as adding links to Wikipedia articles. You can read the report.
- The Reading team is working on a separate mobile-based contributions project.
- The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer supported. If you used that toolbar, then you will no longer see any toolbar. You may choose another editing tool in your editing preferences, local gadgets, or beta features.
- The Editing team described the history and status of VisualEditor in this recorded public presentation (starting at 29 minutes, 30 seconds).
- The Language team released a new version of Content Translation (CX2) last month, on International Translation Day. It integrates the visual editor to support templates, tables, and images. It also produces better wikitext when the translated article is published. [1]
Let's work together
- The Editing team wants to improve visual editing on the mobile website. Please read their ideas and tell the team what you think would help editors who use the mobile site.
- The Community Wishlist Survey begins next week.
- If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!
DYK for Brooklyn Naval Hospital
On 3 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brooklyn Naval Hospital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Brooklyn Naval Hospital treated almost a quarter of Union casualties during the American Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brooklyn Naval Hospital. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Brooklyn Naval Hospital), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Mill Basin, Brooklyn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mill Basin, Brooklyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Please restore the undiscussed move you made....
...of 8th Street / St. Mark's Place to 8th Street/St. Mark's Place. The space on either side of the virgule helps to show that it is not an actual combined name, but two names on the same article. If you want to open an RM on it on the talk page, fine, but please move it back first, per the reaming I recently got at AN for not doing exactly that. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- The same holds true for York Avenue / Sutton Place. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: Thanks for bringing up the objection. I've reverted the moves and opened a talk page discussion. See Talk:8th Street / St. Mark's Place#Requested move 6 November 2018. epicgenius (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will head over there now. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Depending on which way the RM falls, could you change the Commons category to match? No need to make an interim change now, I don't think. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure. epicgenius (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: Thanks for bringing up the objection. I've reverted the moves and opened a talk page discussion. See Talk:8th Street / St. Mark's Place#Requested move 6 November 2018. epicgenius (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Growth team updates #3
Welcome to the third newsletter for the new Growth team!
The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.
Two Growth team projects to be deployed in next two weeks
We will be deploying the "Understanding first day" and "Personalized first day" projects on Czech and Korean Wikipedias in the coming weeks. See the new project pages below for full details on the projects, and our project updates page for their progress.
- Understanding first day: learn about the actions new editors take right after creating their accounts. We will be careful with user privacy, and we hope to share initial results in December.
- Personalized first day: learn about new editors' objectives by adding some optional questions to the new editor’s registration process, and personalizing their onboarding. We hope to share initial results in December.
Third Growth team project begins
- Focus on help desk: direct newcomers to the local help desks where they can ask questions to help them make their first edits. We hope to have an initial experiment running in December.
Best practices for helping newcomers
We are going to direct newcomers to help desks. But what's the best way to reply to a newcomer there? We have gathered some best practices for successful interactions, based on community experiences and some external documentation. The page has also been reviewed by some experienced community members who suggested some changes. That page is now open for translations. Comments and suggestions are still welcome!
We are still looking for volunteers
Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.
Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!
Learn more about us
You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project page for detailed updates on the projects we'll work on.
Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 13:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC) • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Grand Central Terminal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Discount rate
- Harlem Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Discount rate
- Hudson Line (Metro-North) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Discount rate
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
New neighborhood maps
I have to say that these maps look pretty bad -- very amateurish. The border around the neighborhood is too thick, and one cannot see anything in the neighborhood - such as the main streets - because the coloring obscures everything. I urge you to stop replacing neighborhood maps, and undo the ones you've changed. If the maps are yours, then I suggest you try again, because this attempt was really not successful. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: These aren't my maps, these were taken from Wikidata. I don't know where the Wikidata maps are from. Anyway, I agree that the border is too thick, though you can just change the zoom level on the map. Also, the previous versions of the maps are in hidden comments, so you can just un-comment these if you want, and remove the newer maps (e.g. in the Chelsea, Manhattan article). epicgenius (talk) 00:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Before | After | Just an area map with no border |
---|---|---|
<mapframe>: The JSON content is not valid GeoJSON+simplestyle. The list below shows all attempts to interpret it according to the JSON Schema. Not all are errors.
|
- Would you say that the map on the center is an improvement? I'm going to add it to the other articles now. (The map on the right is a base map epicgenius (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- The border onthe center map is letter (less thick and less obnoxious), but is there a way to adjust the transparency of the colored area in the center for that the streets can be been to some extent? Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Shape-inverse | Border only |
---|---|
- Well, it doesn't look like there is a way to manipulate the color background (at least for now). How about one of these? epicgenius (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- The one on tne right looks best to me,
although the border could stand to be a pixel or so thicker.Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)- No, the border's fine. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- All right then. I'll be removing the color background for now. Thanks. epicgenius (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, thank you, that looks so much better. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- All right then. I'll be removing the color background for now. Thanks. epicgenius (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, the border's fine. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- The one on tne right looks best to me,
- Well, it doesn't look like there is a way to manipulate the color background (at least for now). How about one of these? epicgenius (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I see that you reduced the precision to the coordinates to three decimal places, and you added names to them. Can you please explain this? —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Eli355: Sure. Coordinate longitude precision to 3 decimal points is approximately 300 feet. The article decimal degrees explains more, but at this latitude, 3 decimal points is around 200 feet. (4 decimal points is about 30 feet, which may be used for further refinement, while at a precision of 5 decimal points, we can identify individual features like tables and chairs.) The names, well, display the name of the building when you click on the coordinate, rather than the page title "List of tallest buildings in New York City". This is especially useful if the coordinates are all exported at the same time, with a template like {{GeoGroup}}. epicgenius (talk) 21:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Even with 300 feet, in Manhattan buildings are so close to each other, it sounds like this might not be enough. —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I'll adjust the coordinates to a 4-decimal-place precision when I get home. Anything further than that may be unnecessary unless the fifth decimal place is a "5". epicgenius (talk) 22:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I'll adjust the coordinates to a 4-decimal-place precision when I get home. Anything further than that may be unnecessary unless the fifth decimal place is a "5". epicgenius (talk) 22:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Even with 300 feet, in Manhattan buildings are so close to each other, it sounds like this might not be enough. —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for East Side Access
On 16 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article East Side Access, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the East Side Access railroad expansion in New York City has been estimated to cost about $3.5 billion per mile of new tunnel, seven times more than similar projects in other countries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/East Side Access. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, East Side Access), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Bergen Beach, Brooklyn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bergen Beach, Brooklyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mill Basin, Brooklyn
The article Mill Basin, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mill Basin, Brooklyn for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bergen Beach, Brooklyn
The article Bergen Beach, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bergen Beach, Brooklyn for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bergen Beach, Brooklyn
The article Bergen Beach, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bergen Beach, Brooklyn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Oops
Thanks for the fix reverting my edit at One Times Square. Uh, the ad-blocker had removed the word "advertising", leaving it as "repurposed as a location", which led to my mistaken change. Oops. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks again! —{{u|Goldenshimmer}}|✝️|they/their|😹|T/C|☮️|John 15:12|🍂 22:18, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Epicgenius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Epicgenius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mill Basin, Brooklyn
The article Mill Basin, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mill Basin, Brooklyn for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WA license plate 2011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WA license plate 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
23rd Street reopening in question
Under planned service changes, the date was reverted to December, so I don't know how we should deal with this.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, I actually just passed by the station and it was closed. I think we should revert the edits until the opening is confirmed. epicgenius (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've reverted the edits. The walls were down, and the screens, glass fare control, and platform edges were all installed. But for some reason there was a "Exit" sign leaning against the wall. From the looks of it, it seems like they might be ready next week or something. There aren't any pictures, unfortunately, or I would've posted it on NYC Transit Forums, even though I don't really post that often. epicgenius (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Penn Station Numbers
The article stated that 630,000 passengers use Penn Station.
And we already know the following: LIRR - 233,340 NJT - 93,305 Amtrak - 28,487 Subway - 200,000 = 555,132
Since 630,000 passengers use Penn station, 630,000-555,132 = gives us about 75,000 passengers who arrive and depart Penn station not using any of the above means. Which means they arrive by the only remaining way which are Buses. Mercenary2k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Mercenary2k: I see, thanks. However, I think ride share and taxis are also included in this total. In any case, I think we should only include the LIRR, NJ Transit, and Amtrak ridership because the subway stations are not actually part of Penn Station, but rather, are connected to it. We can include the subway ridership as a note, but they aren't part of the railroad component of Penn Station (i.e. they don't use the 11 platforms and 21 tracks for commuter/intercity rail, and they each have their own fare collection areas). epicgenius (talk) 14:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)