FPSTurkey

Welcome

Hello FPSTurkey, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

FPSTurkey, good luck, and have fun. – Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! FPSTurkey, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Almaty International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Airport-dest-list

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FPSTurkey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish occupation of northern Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Schalamzaar Empire/Schalamzaar Empire

Hello, FPSTurkey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schalamzaar Empire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 03:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Finnno-Ugric

Hi! I just happened to stumble across your sandbox User:FPSTurkey/sandbox1, which I find quite interesting. I will, however, point out one error: Contrary to the situation in Sweden, standard Finnish has no official status in Norway, while the Kven language is a recognised minority language. Regards! --T*U (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. If there any other errors in the page please tell me. --FPSTurkey (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish occupation of northern Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Local council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FPSTurkey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barisha raid

Hello, FPSTurkey,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Barisha raid for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Barisha raid

Hello, FPSTurkey,

Thank you for creating Barisha raid.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Some actual content would be nicce.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

I will help add contact, although it is an article about a current event with VERY limited information. FPSTurkey (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Second Battle of Ras A-Ain - results box

There is a discussion going on the talk page for this battle, currently to seek consensus on what result should go in the infobox. I noticed you have made a contribution to that page. It would be good to have your consensus on the topic. I tend to agree with you, simply listing the result as a Turkish victory indicates they simply won militarily, which was not the case Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2019 United States bombing of Kata'ib Hizbollah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 United States bombing of Kata'ib Hizbollah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 United States bombing of Kata'ib Hizbollah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SharabSalam (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 15:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPSTurkey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why were ALL my edits reversed

Dear User:Alexf,

Maybe your decision to ban me and reverse my edit on that user's userpage was justified but why did you reverse ALL my edits? What was the point?

You reversed this edit despite it NOT being vandalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Order_of_battle_for_the_2019%E2%80%9320_Western_Libya_offensive&diff=948176274&oldid=947955047

You reversed this edit which was a discussion on a talk page, despite NOT being vandalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turkish_involvement_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War&diff=948176320&oldid=943875968

Why did you do this? What was the point? The first edit was an actual edit to include information on a current event, you removed it for seemingly no reason and actually removed information. The second edit was a serious comment in a discussion. Why did you remove them? Do you bother to look at the edits of those accused of vandalism? Do you just blindly reverse all their edits? --FPSTurkey (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPSTurkey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked and I will not do so again. I did my original vandalism (limited in scale) on a specific user's page because of some petty personal dispute, but I do actual edits and contributions and I would like to continue doing so.

Decline reason:

You clearly demonstrated you blatantly lack the maturity required of editors here. Your best chance is to wait six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. Given your abhorrent behaviour, I have to warn you this chance is slim. At that point, you will need a significantly more convincing unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, whatever. If you are not going to unban me once I apologise, and I understand I am not "entitled" to be unbanned or whatever, can I at least get a statement why your fellow admin reversed all my edits (almost all of which were legitimate edits as seen here were reversed)? FPSTurkey (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Order of battle for the 2019–20 Western Libya offensive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Order of battle for the 2019–20 Western Libya offensive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of battle for the 2019–20 Western Libya offensive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UK European Union Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on UK European Union Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. doktorb _words^deeds 21:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of UK European Union Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UK European Union Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK European Union Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

doktorb _words^deeds 22:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation Tigris Shield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Tigris Shield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Tigris Shield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)