Timtrent

Click here to leave a new message, LINK to any article you want me to look at And sign your posts using ~~~~. I may not bother with posts where articles are not linked and posts are not signed. I may just delete them and ignore them and you. I do not review drafts on request, nor, normally, do I review a draft more than once, so please do not ask If you want me to do something for you, make it easy for me, please.

This is the home account for Fiddle Faddle, which is both my nickname and my alternate account. When you begin a new message section here, I will respond to it here. When I leave message on your Talk page, I will watch your page for your response. This maintains discussion threads and continuity. See Help:Talk page#How to keep a two-way conversation readable. If you want to use {{Talkback}} or {{ping}} to alert me about messages elsewhere, please feel free to do so.

It is 10:45 PM where this user lives. If it's the middle of the night or during the working day they may well not be online. For accurate time please the page

I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.

AFC Review

Hello! I am inclined to accept this draft seeing they are a professor and they got some awards, however I see there are a lots of issues in this article too. This is why I am seeking a second opinion before making a decision. Kindly check it out and let me know your view Tesleemah (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Tesleemah With academics I look primarily at the quality of their professorship. The UK rarely has named chairs for professors, so I use judgement. In this case I agree with yours. The article certainly stands a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion request. Accept at your leisure! Or fast! Or at medium speed.

After acceptance I check for orphan-ness, and also tend to ask for improvement of the categories 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Alright, Thank you for your view Tesleemah (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Tesleemah I try very hard, even if a draft is borderline, to accept it. I mean any draft. It's a useful discipline to acquire, sometimes hard to do. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

I agree so far they meet the notability guide, minor improvement can still be done. I don't want to be in haste earlier and this is why I seek a second opinion. I'm glad you caught that early! Tesleemah (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Carmarthen Bay Ferries article

Hi TimTrent, Draft Page Thanks for your assistance recently, it is appreciated. I have made changes as below:

• Removed links to external sites within the main body of the article and used them as references/citations at the base of the page.

• I have added organisational structure, stating that directors and not in receipt of payment.

You had mentioned a potential copyright issue using the company logo on the article, when the company was created the chair registered it as a trademark, please could you guide me as to what I need to do in order that the logo is acceptable in the article.

I rather hope that this is an improvement from the first submission, but as always any further comment on the likelyhood of the page being accepted would be excellent!

Thanks in advance,

Pancakefarm.

Pancakefarm (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

About Draft of Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin)

Hi and Good Morning Timtrent

I am just finished major changes about references...

1) I added 16 more sources, so total now are 32.

2) I delete all youtube links from references and I replaced them with regular articles about each work

3) I fix all references with correct details as need it.

Please tell me what to do next...

Thanks so much

George Liristis (georgelgreco here) Georgelgreco (talk) 05:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

There is a weird line above the review history, Georgelgreco. It shoudl be moved. But please don't delete the review history by accident.

You need other people to review it now, so please resubmit it for review. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

So I can resubmit it doing the same prosedure from move button?? Georgelgreco (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco No. There is, or ought to be, a big blue SUBMIT button. Click the SUBMIT button and all will be well 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco Ah. RESUBMIT 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I could not find this blue button I just have the big blue button on right top with publish changes so I press it Georgelgreco (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco It was in the DECLINE BOX, bottom left. Ah well, I'll go and see what you have achieved 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Car I right at my top of the article this {{AfC submission|||ts=20241122161811|u=Georgelgreco|ns=3}} and then publish it?? Georgelgreco (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco Not really. I will submit it for you 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco  Done. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I put the line {{ ... }} subt above with submit thats why looking like that Georgelgreco (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco I think there is a language difficuly. You might wish to send sone tie editing the version fo Wikipedia in your native language. The mechanisms are (almost) identical

The draft is ready for review. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Can I add something now at the references?? Georgelgreco (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Georgelgreco Yes. Submitting for review does not freeze it. Work on it all you wish. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft xx network

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Xx_network

Hi Timtrent. Thank you for reviewing my xx network article draft. Can you explain to me how articles from important newspaper and media such as Wired, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg and Cointelegraph are considered low quality sources? Also you are saying I have too many sources, but a previous reviewer told ne I didn't have enough sources. So according to you I should choose max 3 sources? Thanks again. I will work on it until aporoved so it would be really appreciated if you could guide me to an approval for this article on which I already spent so much time and effort. Jstrob (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jstrob Once a fact is cited then it is cited. More is overkill. More than three is Citekill

Excessive referencing is bombardment.

Redeploying the excess or keeping only the best is pragmatic. But reviewing before we know the sources you truly will be using is fruitless. Does that help? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)