Wanna start a new topic? Just use the link to leave a new message. Thanks.

Welcome!

Hello, Fightingirish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Allen3 talk 21:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


WCBS FM changes

edit

I kwept the airstaff lineup but took down the management stuff. The Logo is the Classic vershion of the CBS FM logo it is slightly diffrent then the curent logo. If you want to get rid of a logo get rid on the 2004-2005 yellow a blue logo. The Q104.3 page has DJ lineup and management. I also took down the jack rateings someone had posted

DLA75

WCBS DJ Times

edit

The the DJ shifs are not listed on WCBS FM.com why not have the times on the page?

Stevie afd

edit

Hello, please note that when you click on this afd it goes to the next one on the list. I think you need to do the template on the article. Good luck! Renee 01:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Forgot to add the template.--Fightingirish 01:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alright then

edit

Yes, it just seemed like a collection of links to me. Perhaps you should create them after there's a need, or when creating them there should be some content... the lack of content was what really made it stick out to me. However, I'll ignore them, if you actually do plan on filling them with content. Sorry for any perceived offense.James SugronoContributions 08:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

More radio empty pages

edit

I can eventually see the purpose of years in radio but you really need to add at least something to make it legitimate. You can't argue if you create empty pages if they are tagged for speedy ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 08:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

If however you plan on adding details asap please use the under construction tag so other editors know your intentions thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 08:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

KSL (radio)

edit

I'd like to thank you for your comments on the talk page for KSL (radio). You worded your argument very well and covered all the guidelines necessary. It's good to see another well-written editor working on the WP:WPRS project, especially in terms of content, as I'm more of a structure-type editor. Keep up the good work! JPG-GR 18:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

FYI, you posted your response to JPG-GR on his user page instead of his talk page. You should move your response to the right page. Never mind, you fixed it. -- HiEv 18:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

"In Radio"

edit

I noticed your "In Radio" links, via a warning placed on a anon's talk page. This is a REALLY cool idea. I added the relaunch (after three years) of "B94" in Pittsburgh, PA on the 2007. Are you doing just notable changes or format flips for all radio stations? I would love to help out, either way, as I work on ALOT of the radio stations in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC. Please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 03:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don and Mike

edit

You tagged Don and Mike as having poor or irrelevant examples, could you visit the talk page and give some specific examples?--Rtphokie 18:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Advertising

edit

Hey, I get it. You're really into this, I'm a noob who apparently stepped on your toes. I don't want to fight, and I respect the considerable work you've done here.

However, considering the nature of the wiki, I do feel the need to state my case, and I hope you're open to considering it.

The two things that make WMYX unique in Milwaukee are their marquee programming feature (The No Repeat Nine To Five Workday) and their cash contest (Phrase That Pays). Not all radio stations do that. All radio stations do things _like_ that.

My thought is that every radio station entry should include their programming features and promotional concepts, not in a way that markets them to the reader, but in a way that describes them (reporting the news, not sensationalizing or spinning it).

That's all I'm going for.

It's no different than the FOX Broadcasting Co entry displaying a current program lineup and list of previous and current network slogans. It's not encouraging me to watch, it's just an accurate description of what they're doing.

If all radio station entries were like WMYX is now, they would have a vague history and format description. Radio stations are more than that, and deserve something more.

IMHO. Thanks for listening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.131.26.176 (talk) 03:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not a very nice tone in that first paragraph. You're being rude.
The advertising slogans you mentioned are not very unique. There's at least a station in every single market that does both. And for many, many years, too. Not very original.
It's no different than the FOX Broadcasting Co entry displaying a current program lineup and list of previous and current network slogans. It's not encouraging me to watch, it's just an accurate description of what they're doing.
Apples and oranges. And slogans are encouraged. The stuff you added was cruft.
If all radio station entries were like WMYX is now, they would have a vague history and format description. Radio stations are more than that, and deserve something more.
You should take a look at other radio articles. In addition, check out the Radio Project. In addition, I suggest you also register, lest someone assume that your very first edits were vandalism.--Fightingirish 05:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
First edits were not vandalism, they were my kids. Just because I do not wish to create an account does not make me an intentional vandal, or less of a citizen here.
Please do not mistake my tone, which came out of humility and respect. I'm not sure how much more clear I can make myself. I am a noob. I resepect your work. Because I disagree with you does not make my tone rude. Let's put emotion aside so we can deal with the philosophy of these types of entries please.
Reporting a station's programming lineup, marquee features, even promotional concepts, should be a part of every station entry. It's what gives a station its identity beyond a simple, bland format description and history. Furthermore, each station should have its own Marketing and Promotion segment, just like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_dew.
As a radio guy yourself, certainly you can see the value in describing a radio station more fully. Every radio station in every market does not have identical features. The Cleveland market is much different from the Milwaukee market is much different than New York City.
In fact, that's a great idea for an entry: Radio station promotional concepts. Collectively, radio has been responsible for a number of memorable stunts, events, and tactics that should be cateloged.—72.131.26.176 21:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Please comment

edit

Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas

edit

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 14:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:KFOXlogo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:KFOXlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space

edit

  Hey there Fightingirish, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fightingirish/KDFC-FM. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled

edit
 

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'll be the Barney Fife of autopatrollers! :)--Fightingirish (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WWRL06.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WWRL06.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WQBW07.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WQBW07.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Wnov.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Wnov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Roster template

edit

Players cannot officially sign until Friday, so please do not change the roster templates until then. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Wcco2006.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Wcco2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

KFMG-LP

edit

I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article KFMG-LP in the New Articles list-- However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing.Amy Z (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hope this is to your liking. Hey, at least I used citations! Many people just wing it. :)--Fightingirish (talk) 23:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WRLL2006.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WRLL2006.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi there Fightingirish. Just letting you know that KDFC changed their logo. http://www.kdfc.com/pages/9009139.php? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.170.166.34 (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

New articles

edit

Nice job on creating base articles for the public radio station redirects. Just one request if you don't mind — could you please tag the talk pages too? Just add {{WikiProject Radio Stations}} and the template for the relevant state WikiProject too, so that they get picked up in reporting. Thanks, and happy wiki-ing! Mlaffs (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've been adding them as I go along. Can't do everything at once! :b --Fightingirish (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Allegheny Mountain Radio

edit

I have reverted your changes to the station pages of Allegheny Mountain Radio, as well as the Allegheny Mountain Radio page itself. Like any radio network, the stations of Allegheny Mountain Radio have no local programming and broadcast everything that Allegheny Mountain Radio plays, which is broadcast out of WVMR-AM in Frost, West Virginia. Yeah, you could consider the stations "local studios" because any studio can be used to broadcast over the whole network, but no one station "breaks away" for individual programming. Kinda like your K-Love stations, just REALLY small. Your work was good work, not saying it wasn't, but it just isn't necessary and under the rules of WP:WPRS the stations themselves, as they broadcast the Allegheny Mountain Radio network aren't notable by themselves. Again, good work. :) - NeutralhomerTalk13:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have been going through many of the non-commercial radio networks to break up various pages and set up individual articles for each station. Too many main pages have gotten cluttered and confusing. I've been doing it with many other networks of larger, similar size or smaller (and AMR IS a network, consisting of full-power stations licensed by the FCC -- and full-power stations are usually notable enough to merit their own articles). There is a difference between these and the K-Love 'stations', which are mostly low-power translators (which do not get their own articles). Perhaps this is something that can be discussed on the radio stations project page.--Fightingirish (talk) 13:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am open for discussion on this. I should note that AMR isn't an NPR network as they carry very little, if any, NPR programming outside of The Writer's Almanac and WCPE's classic programming (carried by stations nationwide as "Great Classical Music") I am not sure if they even carry NPR news to be honest with ya. So, they are really just a radio network, not a "non-commercial radio network" or a "National Public Radio member networks" (or station) as categoried. - NeutralhomerTalk14:06, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh and to clarify, I am not saying that non-commerical stations are not notable, I am saying that since they are part of a network of stations and don't carry their own individual programming they are not notable. If they were independent of the network, they would be immediately notable. - NeutralhomerTalk14:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I put most of my rebuttals on the Project talk page. And any station that carries any NPR programming (even if the only show they carry is World Cafe or whatever), it is an NPR affiliate. I've merely been going down the whole list of NPR-affiliated networks. And yes, I do consider APR, which consists of five stations, to be a network. All five stations are full-power and licensed by the FCC, which in itself makes them individually notable (as per the Project).--Fightingirish (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not to step into the middle of the conversation, but I have a feeling that the two of you are going to get along pretty well once we get to the other side of this debate. Just saying...
Also, Fightingirish, I'm just a bit tickled that we both decided to take a crack at NPR at the exact same time. In my case, it's adding the NPR member station category to articles, while more and more of those articles that I would have considered missing are appearing as you build out the networks. I love collaboration, even when it's unintentional! If you're up for it, you're more than welcome to update the standing list of missing/redirected articles at User:Mlaffs/Missing_U.S._radio_station_articles as you go. If not, don't worry — your additions will get removed from that page by me or someone else eventually. Mlaffs (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
@Irish: That part about NPR I didn't know about, so fault placed on me there.
@Mlaffs: I responded in full to everyone at the WP:WPRS discussion.
@All: I am heading off to bed (haven't gone to sleep yet), so I will catch up when I wake up. Have a good day, all. :) - NeutralhomerTalk15:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

WMRA

edit

This is kinda like the AMR thing above, WMRA is the umbrella page for WMRY Charlottesville, WMRL Lexington, WMLU Farmville and W233AA Winchester, along with WMRA Harrisonburg. WMRY and WMRL carry WMRA programming solely and ID as "WMRA", nothing else. They are just rebroadcasters. It is possible that they might have had histories before WMRA, but I don't think so. It is worth asking User:Dravecky about, along with the AMR stations. - NeutralhomerTalk15:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, the WMRY and WMRL pages redirect to WMRA (or they did last I checked). - NeutralhomerTalk15:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have noticed you have created pages for the translators of WMRA, along with WVTF and WWVT. While this is awesome, I have to beg of you to please, please, please, please make sure you update all links in the radio station market templates. That means if you create an article for WVTR (FM), you have to switch "WVTF" for "WVTR (FM)" in the Southwest VA Radio template. Same goes for the rest. - NeutralhomerTalk15:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have been updating the infoboxes the best I can. Can't do everything at once. And I have been breaking up most of the rebroadcaster pages, for simplification and because we're dealing with full-power licensed stations, most of them in Arbitron-rated markets. Some of these pages have gotten pretty cluttered and messy.--Fightingirish (talk) 16:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, how about we do this. While I get a soda, give me a list of what stations you are doing in Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland (my watch area) and I will update the market templates accordingly. It will save you a crapload of work. - NeutralhomerTalk16:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
As far as I know, I haven't done Maryland. Went through and did the WMRA station's local templates. Did WV as well. I did whatever templates were on the articles, and I may have missed a few. Been trying to get them as soon as I could.--Fightingirish (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, no problem. I will do a run-through on Virginia and give a second look-see. Fresh eyes, don't hurt. :) - NeutralhomerTalk16:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

licensed to vs. located in or broadcasting to

edit

In a number of recently created articles you incorrectly identify the place where the radio station is located as the licensee. Please be more careful. olderwiser 18:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Easy now! On those articles I merely copied the information verbatim from the Michigan Radio page to the individual articles. Hey, we all make mistakes, right? That's why Wikipedia is collaborative, right?--Fightingirish (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
All I'm saying is to be more careful. There was in fact nothing in the Michigan Radio article before your edits that said the stations were licensed to the locality. Besides, there is the same pattern of error in other articles you've recently created as well. olderwiser 20:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see what you're talking about. I don't consider that an error. Perhaps you just don't understand. But if you really want to go through and 'correct' every article I've done, then be my guest. Until then, keep the snottiness and holier-than-thou attitude off my talk page.--Fightingirish (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
And typically, a city of license may not be exactly where a station and/or its transmitter is located. That is why I phrase it the way I do. I figure anyone with half a brain can see the distinction between a city and an entity.--Fightingirish (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
It seems a rather confusing and careless use of pronouns. Many readers are not native speakers. Saying that a station is licensed to X, certainly sounds like X is the licensee for the station. For those unfamiliar with American radio, it is not immediately obvious that a municipality is unlikely to be the license holder for a radio station. Certainly there is a way to be both clear and accurate. olderwiser 02:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Pardon the intrusion but this is why I usually say that a station is "licensed to serve the community of Auburn, Alabama" and then later that "the broadcast license is held by the Acme Radio Corporation, Inc." Eliminating ambiguity can be fun! - Dravecky (talk) 17:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

KCRW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to China Lake, California
WRTY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Jackson Township, Pennsylvania

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fixed!--Fightingirish (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In KYCR, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page KMSP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

WLZL to WNEW-FM

edit

Could you perhaps help move the pages WLZL to WNEW-FM, and WBGR (FM) to WLZL. The call letters were changed today (December 12). Thank you. --Radiokid1010 (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Allegheny Mountain Radio (Part 2)

edit

Just wanted to loop you in on this discussion on User:Dravecky's talk page. - NeutralhomerTalk21:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paradise Lost (2013 film)

edit

You recently took part in a deletion discussion for this film, but given new information that the film is now on hold[1][2], would suggest a redirect to Paradise Lost#Films is more appropriate as per WP:NFF, and as per suggested by multiple editors at the deletion discussion. Would appreciate input at Talk:Paradise Lost (2013 film)#Redirect. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

edit
 
Fightingirish, I hope you have a Merry Christmas and hope your day is full of the true spirit of the day.
Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) - NeutralhomerTalk00:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Reply

Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Pending edits - seeking your advice/eye

edit

Hi, I have some pending factual edits (programs carried, station nbrs, staff names etc) but I know of these details because it's my organization. I don't edit much but take the Wikipedia principles, policies and guidelines very seriously.

Would you be willing to review these for temp check? -Julia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia Schrenkler (talkcontribs) 15:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

WFME

edit

Thanks for catching that error. I meant to put January. Don't know why I had December in my mind, For some reason it just stuck there. :0) TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited More Than Just A Dream (album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages M83 and James King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Whqg.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Whqg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Whqg2006.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Whqg2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WKQX-LP2012.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WKQX-LP2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:KSJO80s.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:KSJO80s.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of KKSF (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article KKSF (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unnecessary disambiguation per WP:TWODABS. A hatnote does the trick.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 20:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KNOF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KTWN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WVON1690.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WVON1690.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Fightingirish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KBAY.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KBAY.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Progressive talk radio for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progressive talk radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive talk radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 14:36, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Fightingirish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

edit

Hello Fightingirish! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 20:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KBIG2007.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KBIG2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ktoe.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ktoe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KXAC-FM.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KXAC-FM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KYSM-FM.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KYSM-FM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:02, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KFMC.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KFMC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Fightingirish. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KYSMAM.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KYSMAM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve WQFB-LP

edit

Hello, Fightingirish,

Thanks for creating WQFB-LP! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Added a few references and removed the tag. Fightingirish (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve WYBO

edit

Hello, Fightingirish,

Thanks for creating WYBO! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

References added, tag removed. --Fightingirish (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve WMWG-LP

edit

Hello, Fightingirish,

Thanks for creating WMWG-LP! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:58, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you please add your references to this article? Boleyn (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve WIWI-LP

edit

Hello, Fightingirish,

Thanks for creating WIWI-LP! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you please add your references? Boleyn (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve WBQR-LP

edit

Hello, Fightingirish,

Thanks for creating WBQR-LP! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marc Sussman's Money Message for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Sussman's Money Message is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Sussman's Money Message until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Salem, South Carolina has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Salem, South Carolina has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KYCY2005.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KYCY2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:U100-WYOO.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:U100-WYOO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of KGPR

edit
 

The article KGPR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

hyperlocal non-profit radio station that fails to meet WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ktwn2012.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ktwn2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch 06:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of WVSS

edit
 

The article WVSS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

poorly referenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 79.5 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of WHWC (FM)

edit
 

The article WHWC (FM) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

poorly referenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KBAY.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KBAY.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KKGN.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KKGN.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch 21:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ktwn2012.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ktwn2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch 21:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of KAGI for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAGI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAGI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Greatder (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of WTAS-LD

edit
 

The article WTAS-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Kege.png

edit
 

The file File:Kege.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Former logo of radio station KEGE-FM, whose current callsign is KXXR. No longer serving the purpose specified in its rationale (no longer assuring readers that they have reached the right article). Current use is WP:DECORATIVE. Has been replaced in the infobox by the station's new logo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:KQRS1978a.png

edit
 

The file File:KQRS1978a.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Former logo of radio station KQRS-FM. No longer serving the purpose specified in its rationale (no longer assuring readers that they have reached the right article). Current use is WP:DECORATIVE. Has been replaced in the infobox by the station's new logo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:KQRS1979.png

edit
 

The file File:KQRS1979.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Former logo of radio station KQRS-FM. No longer serving the purpose specified in its rationale (no longer assuring readers that they have reached the right article). Current use is WP:DECORATIVE. Has been replaced in the infobox by the station's new logo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WBQR-LP for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBQR-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBQR-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-channyan 22:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KMKO-FM Blaze radio logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KMKO-FM Blaze radio logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KWOD2006.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KWOD2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply