King G.A

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lemon (N.E.R.D and Rihanna song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Believe It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding links to redirects or links you obviously haven't checked to articles

Hi. Links like this that you added to Lemon (N.E.R.D and Rihanna song) help nobody. As an IP editor also pointed out upon removing said link, it points to a disambiguation page, so I assume you did not check it. This is not the first time you have added a link to an article you haven't checked. Even if it were a redirect, which you have linked to before, it wouldn't help or inspire an editor to create it by linking to it. So please stop adding unhelpful links. Future insertions of this kind will be reverted/removed. Thanks. Ss112 07:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Smile (Katy Perry album)

Why did you undo this edit? Did you even read my edit summary? ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Is there an origin of the song on the album? Except meaning? King G.A (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Diddy is only featured on some versions of the vinyl album. It seems silly to have a whole section for just one change that appears on only some versions of the album. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 13:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes but that's an important detail, it did not even come out as a single in this version and it is included in this album also the only collaboration that exists in the album itself. Sorry if my English is not good. King G.A (talk) 13:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

By constantly reverting, you are now edit warring. Per WP:BRD once someone has reverted you and offered discussion you need to take it to the talk page, not keep reverting. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Are you saying that to me? King G.A (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Future Nostalgia

You have edit warred around the adding of "Fever" as a single to the infobox of Future Nostalgia.

Please see Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles, it clearly says Do not include singles that were added as bonus tracks on a re-release of an album. It is really clear that only singles from the original version of the album should be featured in the infobox. There is a Side B to Future Nostalgia coming out, I imagine it will be included on there but until there is confirmation we don't know. In future, instead of edit warring when multiple editors have reverted you, you should go to the talkpage and start a discussion without adding said content back into the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

User:Lil-unique1 You're confused I did nothing. 21:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Really? Edit 1, Edit 2. Although I will add that I noticed you reverted yourself. Apologies, it seems IPs have added the info back since. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

User:Lil-unique1 I have not edited the entry since. King G.A (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ruin My Life

Re your reversion on "Ruin My Life", Template:Infobox song#album strongly advises songs released well in advance of the album to not have an album parameter. The song was released 29 months before the album, I think that’s well in advance plus some. If you look at Talk:Smile (Katy Perry album)#Never Really Over as lead single, you would see that Katy Perry's songs Never Really Over (May 2019), Small Talk (August 2019), Harleys in Hawaii (October 2019) and Never Worn White (March 2020) were not included on Smile (Katy Perry album) (July 2020) as singles, even though they were all singles and were all released within 14 months of the album. Please self revert, given the information I have provided. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Do not repeat edits because you do full disabilities feel free to cancel them I do not care. King G.A (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

?? What do you mean by that? I am having trouble understanding. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Like about Ellie Goulding's latest album the singles that are not recorded correctly. King G.A (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Nobody Is Listening. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. One way of displaying ownership of articles is reverting without edit summaries. You are not acknowledging my points that I have made, like you don’t care. I gave valid reasons, you didn’t give any. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Wait until Friday and see that it's a list of tracks. King G.A (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

No. Per MOS:ALBUM#Track listing, you need a reliable WP:SECONDARY source for track listings for albums that have not been released yet. Zayn's official website is a WP:PRIMARY source, and can not be used. Therefore, the track listing is unsourced and going against MOS:ALBUM, the reason for my removals. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

An example of a reliable secondary source is Apple Music. Although, it only states names of tracks Zayn has already released, so if Apple Music is cited, only those tracks can be included. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Do not contact me. King G.A (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Sandstein 18:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

The reason for this block is documented in the ANI thread. Sandstein 18:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sandstein:, You blocked me just because you know it ..? I have contributed quite a bit here and you are just blocking me. King G.A (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

The reason for your block is on the ANI thread. You have failed to and outright refused to cooperate with other editors, something which is absolutely required on Wikipedia. Edit warring; that is, reverting many times in a row for the same reason; is not on, and so is refusing to discuss when asked. So, no, don't just dismiss us claiming we don't know; we do, and are absolutely right to block for it. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 20:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

I did not talk to you what you answer me?? King G.A (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Because whether I have engaged with you before is irrelevant. I have seen the report and am just as qualified to answer you as any other user. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 20:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

OK. You all know everything well, I was blocked. It's a pity it did not happen a long time ago, a joke here with you. King G.A (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

So, are you going to use your talk page access for an unblock or not? As detailed in the instruction, of course. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 20:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

This is in reply to your following e-mail: "Hey, I know my English is not good. But I wanted to know if you can block me permanently right now on your Wikipedia so that I do not edit her name at all in the near future? And if I want to request a blockage release but I can do so in the future?"

I cannot reply to this because it makes no sense to me. If you cannot communicate effectively in English, that is another reason why you should not edit the English language Wikipedia. Sandstein 15:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Badlands (Live from Webster Hall) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badlands (Live from Webster Hall) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlands (Live from Webster Hall) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 14:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)