Horsesforcorses
Welcome!
Hello, Horsesforcorses, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingturtle (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
January 2008
edit
Hi, the recent edit you made to August Ferdinand Hermann Kretzschmar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dont be stupid. Obviously you didnt even look at my edit, just reverted. Either that or you havent heard of Wikipedia:COMMONNAMES and Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Dates_of_birth_and_death. Go read them before posting your blah blah blah warnings, noob, in case someone who knows what theyre doing decides we can all do without you. Horsesforcorses (talk) 19:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Novak Đoković
editRight now, I'm trying to see if we can persuade Zocky. If we can't, then I think it's onto AN/I. What I think some don't know is that Zocky is an admin. That's why I'm hesitant to revert the revert. He doesn't use his admin powers real often but he has the admin powers. You can't do a move over a redirect without them (because you have to delete the page you are moving to). And I don't want to get into a move war. I feel like I'm right on this one, but I'd rather go the AN/I route to get other input rather than start a war. But let's give it a couple of more days anyway. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 03:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, what was the reason you change the article name without discussion ? ITs is known as CITEFA both in spanish and english. Jor70 (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes but you missed the point there is nothing in the "Articles" that assert notability. described as "installment of the #1 "New York Times" bestselling series" by one online bookseller) does appear in any shape for form. How would anyone reading the article know that they were notable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I didnt miss the point. I took two minutes to check on Google about a bookseries I havent heard of. Prodder didnt do that. I found out the series sold 3m copies. Notable so shouldnt be deleted. If Editor 1 writes an article on a notable subject but doesnt follow the wikirules. Editors 2/3/4 should improve it, not delete it. What I should have done at the same time was change the 'notability' templates for 'references' ones. If its notable, leave it for wikignomes or experts in the subject.