User talk:HouseBlaster/Archive 7

Latest comment: 29 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Books & Bytes – Issue 65
Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Texas Government Sites are Free Use

You stated my content was "paraphrasing" for a Award Criteria. Award criteria's on Wikipedia always remain verbatim as they are specific criteria's. Furthermore you stated it was copyrighted. The source was The State of Texas and The Governors Office of Texas. Both of those cannot copyright the material such as Award Info and Criteria as it's free-use. Please learn the law and understand it before making changes. TheNathanMuir (talk) 13:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@TheNathanMuir: first, if you are copying verbatim, it needs to be in quotation marks or else it is plagiarism. Next, on Wikipedia, we require that text borrowed from other sources be more than "free-use". We require that it be eligible for commercial redistribution. The Texas website says it prohibits commercial redistribution, so we cannot use it on Wikipedia. The Texas website is copyrighted: the opposite of copyrighted is in the public domain, not "free use". Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
It was not verbatim. It was re-written hence you putting it was "paraphrased". The award which is public law is not copyrightable. Hence why every other government award on Wikipedia is written verbatim. TheNathanMuir (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: You need to supply proof that it is not eligible copyright. HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Works by the federal government are legally public domain, but per https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/texas/ it's not clear whether works of Texas state government are. This is the case for, e.g. works of the State of California -- but not for every state. @TheNathanMuir: The burden is on you to supply evidence that positively states that the State of Texas releases its works into the public domain (or is statutorily required to do so). This means that, for example, https://gov.texas.gov/site-policies does not count -- it simply lacks any statement on copyright for textual content -- this is not enough. jp×g🗯️ 16:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
You're the one ACCUSING me of Copyright Infringement, thus the burden of proof is on YOU. Where is the burden of proof ever on the person defending themself?
If the laws and case laws show it's Federally accepted that you can't copyright Governmental stuff like Awards, then it's the same for States unless otherwise specifically noted, which for Texas it is not.
This award was created by Texas Law. You cannot copyright a law. You cannot copyright any part of the law. The text was taken directly from the law.
Use some common sense. TheNathanMuir (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
TheNathanMuir Where is the burden of proof ever on the person defending themself? on Wikipedia, for one. See WP:BURDEN. But that is not necessary, because even if the burden was on me I have provided evidence that the text from the website is not eligible for commercial distribution. Eligibility for commercial distribution is a requirement for inclusion on Wikipedia. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to disprove the assertion that it is not eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. You are getting very close to an "I didn't hear that" block. HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
That's a lot of words for saying nothing. I don't think you understand how the laws in the U.S work. If there is no specific law banning or allowing something at a local, county or state level, it falls on established Federal guidelines.
Federal Guidelines in this case state that Government Work (Such as Awards, Laws, Etc) are Public Domain and thus cannot be copyrighted. The State follows the Federal law in this case because there is no State laws stating otherwise. It's not a abstract or complex issue here. You're saying that it's copyrighted (which it's not). There are plenty of other awards on here from Texas that have had no issues (cite: Awards and decorations of the Texas government#Public Safety Office). Furthermore there are no issues on Military awards either (cite: Awards and decorations of the United States Armed Forces). Wikimedia Commons also establishes that works produced by the government are Public domain, hence the massive amount of images of Government Works.
  • The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that federal law takes precedence over state and local laws. This principle is supported by:
    • McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Affirmed that federal laws have supremacy over conflicting state laws.
    • Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): Reinforced federal authority over interstate commerce, highlighting federal preeminence.
    • Supremacy Clause: Directly states that federal law is the "supreme Law of the Land." These provisions ensure that in the absence of local laws, federal laws apply.
The text I wrote for the award was from and per the Law (Texas Government Code, Title 4, Subtitle B, Chapter 3106)
You legally cannot copyright a law, or most Government Works.
  • It's public information and public records. Since this Award was created by law it would fall under Wheaton V. Peters (1834) [The U.S. Supreme Court case Wheaton v. Peters (1834) established that no one can claim a copyright in laws or judicial opinions.]
  • Under Title 17, Section 105 of the United States Code, it is stated that "Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government." This is often interpreted to mean that federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and other official documents are not eligible for copyright protection.
  • Texas state law reflects this general principle. Texas Government Code Section 552.002 defines public information, which includes information that is written, produced, collected, assembled, or maintained under a law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by a governmental body. This ensures that such information, including laws, is public and accessible.
  • Banks v. Manchester (1888): Reinforced that judicial opinions, which are government-created, are public domain. This principle extends to other government works.
Now again, I have proven my side consistently, please explain your side without tagging a useless page that has no merit on this discussion. TheNathanMuir (talk) 16:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Also you tagged the page Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations, I provided Citations for everything I used so again I am not understanding the issue. I did the citations exactly how other awards and decorations are done on Wikipedia. I also did everything as I was supposed to. It appears you haven't a clue and made a mistake but lack humility to admit it. TheNathanMuir (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
TheNathanMuir: I referenced WP:BURDEN because you asked where in the world the burden is on the defendant. I provided such an example. I agree you have met that burden in this case. I was just providing an example in which the burden is on the "accused".
In general, text of statues is not copyrighted. However, the website is not a statue. You can include things like the official qualifications which are defined in a statue. (However, they need to be enclosed in quotes or otherwise indicated that it is copying from a public domain source. This is not a legal requirement; it is "only" a Wikipedia rule. See Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources.) But things that are not statutory text, such as the blurb from the website explaining what the award is, are subject to copyright. Read the statue: it is very clear that it applied to works of the US government, not the governments of individual states (including Texas). And again: that website says it does not authorize commercial use. Either that website is lying or it cannot be used on Wikipedia. HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
The text from the site, was from the law. Almost verbatim. So again, how is that plagiarism. Again, the above laws/case laws/citations show that the State cannot copyright things belonging to public domain. So it's doubled down that it's not plagiarism or copyrighted. If it was plagiarized, there would need to be a victim. The State of Texas (SOT) cannot be the victim, because they cannot copyright. The person who wrote it (A government official/employee) cannot be the victim when creating work in official capacity unless explicitly stated (rare occurrence, and it would have to be provided that it was copyrighted), because they are the Government (belonging to), and therefor cannot copyright the writing of the site, belonging to the state, in official capacity for the state. Third, it came directly from the law which; cannot be copyrighted, so again what was plagiarized and who did I plagiarize? As stated this isn't abstract. This isn't complex.
If the content was Third Party content (such as Images taken by Contractors, News Organizations, Etc), or Trademarked (such as "U.S. Army Branch Insignia") this would be different. And again as Texas law states, the website about the Award and Law would be considered Public Information, which means it's not copyrighted.
The website policies state explicitly the only things copyrighted are the Videos and Photographs:
"All photographs and videos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission. Commercial use of any reproduction of any portion of this website is strictly prohibited. The OOG respects the rights of intellectual property owners and will not intentionally infringe on those rights. If an intellectual property owner believes his or her rights have been infringed by the posting or sharing of intellectual property on an OOG website or social media page, please visit the" (Cite: https://gov.texas.gov/site-policies)
The purpose of this is because they often get their content from Third-Parties (see above how that's allowed to be Copyrighted).
The policy above is cited for this page (https://gov.texas.gov/organization/cjd/star-of-texas). Thus, there were no photographs, videos or images taken from this page only Text. The Text was taken from the law. Nullifying any copyright.
Nowhere on https://gov.texas.gov/apps/cjd/staroftexas does it state anything is Copyrighted.
Nowhere onhttps://gov.texas.gov/apps/cjd/staroftexas/default.aspx#:~:text=The%20Star%20of%20Texas%20Awards%20honor%20all%20Texas%20peace%20officers,or%20after%20September%201%2C%202003. does it state anything is Copyrighted.
Nowhere on https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/organization/criminal-justice/All_Recipients--SOTA_Database_9.14.23.pdf states it's copyrighted.
Nowhere in the law https://casetext.com/statute/texas-codes/government-code/title-11-state-symbols-and-honors-preservation/subtitle-a-state-symbols-and-honors/chapter-3106-star-of-texas-awards/section-3106002-peace-officers-star-of-texas-award is anything copyrighted.
The only page I found from the State of Texas that had a copyright was www.texas.gov not the Governors/Office of the Governors page/domains ("OOG") www.gov.texas.gov. You can't use the Copyright for one domain and use it on a different page and Subdomain, especially when they belong to different organizations.
However, looking at www.texas.gov Copyright or "Legal Policy" it says:
"Texas.gov is provided for public use on computer systems located within the State of Texas and for the use and benefit of citizens of Texas. Any person choosing to use this system or seeking access to information or materials on this system is subject to Texas jurisdiction. Any dispute arising therefrom shall be decided under the laws and in the courts in Texas."
Which per the laws cited above make it all PUBLIC INFORMATION, and thus Public Domain, meaning anything produced for the state, by the state, cannot be copyrighted and is available to the public unless explicitly stated otherwise. TheNathanMuir (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: Let's try taking this one step at a time. I never accused you of plagiarism. I just said that if the website was able to be used on Wikipedia, we would need to put it in quotes or else indicate that it was copied from the Texas website. Wikipedia's definition of plagiarism is taking credit for someone else's writing as your own, including their language and ideas, without providing adequate credit. It does not matter whether the writing is copyrighted or in the public domain. It does not require there to be a victim. Can we agree on that? (And yes, I will respond to the rest of your message later. I want to make sure we can first establish some common ground.) HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No other pages in regards to awards or laws on Wikipedia are put in quotes. Bronze Star Medal look here, even with this verbiage is found on many pages, nobody is flagging it as "plagiarism" because it's public works of the Government. (Copied directly from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title10/pdf/USCODE-2023-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap57-sec1128.pdf | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1126 | https://veteranmedals.army.mil/home/us-army-medals-award-badges-ribbon-and-attachments-information/us-army-service-campaign-medals-and-foreign-awards-information)
The Purple Heart text is copied verbatim from Government and public sites as well (https://history.army.mil/html/reference/purhrt.html#:~:text=On%20January%207%2C%201931%2C%20Summerall's,bicentennial%20of%20George%20Washington's%20birth. | https://www.hopeforthewarriors.org/the-purple-heart/ | https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/celebrate/purple-heart.pdf)
If you want to ding me for copying award criteria's verbatim than we can go through and flag 100's of pages on Wikipedia that were taken directly from Government sites.
I've already proven that the work does not belong to anyone as it's created by the Government and free-use, the Texas law and State of Texas acknowledge that, along with Federal Law and Court cases (all provided above). If you had read the data provided it would articulate that. Citations were provided for the Text. It was done the same as every other award page.
Unless you have something that counters everything I've provided besides your opinion don't even respond. If you want to continue this game I expect all the other award pages to get the same treatment. TheNathanMuir (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: So your argument is that because other articles are problematic, you get to continue being problematic? Not how this works. Sorry. And you have not answered my one, simple question: do you agree that plagiarism does not require a victim? It is a simple yes or no question. Please answer it. HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
My argument is it's a Government Website that clearly states it is not copyrighted, and based on the precedent of Wikipedia, shows it's reasonable to copy Award Criteria and Information from Government Sites and Sources. Don't put words into my mouth to fit your fallacy ridden argument.
Plagiarism does require a victim. You can't say it's plagiarism if there's nobody to credit. However, in this instance - if the Government creates something it can't be plagiarized, because the Government cannot be the victim here. This is where fair-use, public information, etc all come into play. Which I've already laid the foundation and proven my argument for. TheNathanMuir (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: Do you want to ask the community to resolve this issue? I don't think we are going to be able to convince each other. HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
You can do what you want. Just don't go deleting pages without you having a understanding of what you're doing. Instead of editing the draft, or making a talk page you guys delete it first. An hour of formatting and sourcing down the drain, over something you have no clue about.
There is no issue, I already revised the text to the best that is possible so it's not verbatim. I provided my sources and the page is good to go.
Nobody has countered my proof that I have provided. It meets the terms of Wikipedia, it's not verbatim, and is not copyrighted per the policy on the OOG site. So I don't know what the issue is. TheNathanMuir (talk) 20:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: Have you already rephrased the article? If so, that is all we need. HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
It has been rephrased since right after you deleted it... TheNathanMuir (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
@TheNathanMuir: Excellent. As long as you are not going to re-incorporate the verbatim text, we are good. (I did not delete the draft you wrote. That was Jimfbleak.) HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Listen, pal: I don't like state governments asserting copyright over their works either, and if I had my druthers, I would tell them to pound sand. But I do not get to have my druthers, and neither do you: we get to follow the rules of this website, which are extremely clear that images are presumed to be copyrighted unless explicitly confirmed otherwise. The rules of this website are a pain in the keister. This is known to be true.
If the state of Texas has broken the law in claiming copyright over their website's contents, this needs to be taken up with them -- in an actual court of law, not a Wikipedia talk page. jp×g🗯️ 18:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin August Issue 2

 
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation over the second half of August 2024. Please help translate

Upcoming and current events and conversations Talking: 2024 continues

Annual Goals Progress on Infrastructure See also newsletters: Wikimedia Apps · Growth · Research · Web · Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia · Tech News · Language and Internationalization · other newsletters on Mediawiki.org

  • Highlights of the Product & Technology department's recent work in improving the user experience.
  • Editor tools related to references & categories and more tech updates on the latest Tech News.
  • Outreachy (a paid, remote three-month internship to support underrepresented groups in tech) is open. Mentors should submit projects before September 11 at 16:00 UTC (more info).
  • The Campaign Events extension is now available on Meta-Wiki, Arabic Wikipedia, Igbo Wikipedia, and Swahili Wikipedia, and can be requested in other language wikis.
  • The Campaigns teams would like to learn more about how your communities do online collaboration such as WikiProjects, please take this Google Form survey or share examples of successful collaborations on Meta Wiki.
  • Editors using the iOS Wikipedia app who have more than 50 edits can now use the Add an Image feature. This feature presents opportunities for small but useful contributions to Wikipedia.
  • Applications for the Product and Technology Advisory Council (PTAC) are still open until September 16.

Annual Goals Progress on Equity See also a list of all movement events: on Meta

Annual Goals Progress on Safety & Integrity See also blogs: Global Advocacy blog · Global Advocacy Newsletter · Policy blog

Board and Board committee updates See Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard · Affiliations Committee Newsletter

  • Some next steps on a movement charter: A message from Wikimedia Foundation CEO, Maryana Iskander, Chair of Board of Trustees, Nataliia Tymkiv, and Chair of Governance Committee, Dariusz Jemielniak.
  • Elections for four community-and-affiliate elected seats on the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation will be held from September 3 to September 17. To learn more about the candidates, watch this short "Meet the Candidates" presentations.

Other Movement curated newsletters & news See also: Diff blog · Goings-on · Wikimedia World · Signpost (en) · Kurier (de) · other newsletters:

Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate

Previous editions of this bulletin are on Meta. Let askcac wikimedia.org know if you have any feedback or suggestions for improvement!


MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Pppery

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Oversighter changes

  Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2024-36

MediaWiki message delivery 01:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello

Hi HouseBlaster. Have a great day! Chloe is a fish (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Chloe is a fish! Let me know if you need any help with anything :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

Category:Governors of the Ottoman Empire by century

Hi, I have noticed that this category has been deleted by the bot, but the relevant discussion's final consensus was not that if I'm not mistaken. I am going to re-create the category if you, @Marcocapelle and Smasongarrison would agree. Aintabli (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

My understanding of the consensus in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 26#Category:Governors of the Ottoman Empire by century was that the by century category was to be merged to Category:Governors of the Ottoman Empire (in other words, the by century categories live directly in Category:Governors of the Ottoman Empire). HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The initial proposal was to delete this category as it had one isolated category in it, which has since not been the case because I populated it with more categories. Then, we went by with Marcocapelle's suggestion, which was to merge and remove the categories within this category so that the categories do not distinguish the continents. Aintabli (talk) 22:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm in different to recreating the by century category. Mason (talk) 00:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Given I clearly misread the consensus in the discussion, I will remove the listing from WP:CFDW. I will then re-create the category in ~an hour (enough time to make sure the bot realizes it has been removed and therefore will not instantly re-delete the category). Apologies for the hassle, Aintabli! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 02:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
No worries. Thank you for your work! Aintabli (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Ditto, HouseBlaster thank you as always for your work! Mason (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Request

After this discussion, would it be possible to undelete the Middle East page and convert it to a redirect? I should've added this in the nomination, but only realize it now. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

@Marcocapelle: Of course! I have removed it from WP:CFDW, but I will wait about an hour before undeleting it because sometimes it takes the bot a minute to realize the category is no longer listed at CFDW. (Otherwise the bot will simply re-delete the page.) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Mind batching nomination?

Mind batching the curly nominations and adding the rest of the set? They are all created by the same editor and all curly characters so the result will be the same either way.

Gonnym (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

No problem :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Edit Filter Helper

don't worry about denying the permission. I'll try to help on the noticeboard a little more before trying again next time. just looking for someone else to do aside from WP:NPP. NYC Guru (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Ashwinitorvi90 (10:56, 7 September 2024)

Hi Mentor, i am trying to create a page for a musician i love, but i have had a few issues, could you have a look at my page editing and let me know if i need to do anything differently? :) Appreciate your help!

Ash --Ashwinitorvi90 (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Ashwinitorvi90: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Trying to write an article from scratch is difficult work. It is highly recommended you try improving existing articles before you dive into creating a new article. Once you feel you are ready, you can check out Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor for information on creating inline citations and Help:Your first article for a detailed look at how to create a brand new article. Let me know if you have any further questions, HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Undiscussed and seemingly uninformed move of template:CNY

There are many of these currency templates. What made you think it was appropriate to move it without discussion? Did you seriously believe that it would be an uncontroversial move? Please revert immediately and make a proper proposal at the article talk page. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@JMF: It is very common to move things without discussion per WP:BOLDMOVE. Generally people find more descriptive template names helpful, and this is encouraged by WP:TG: Template function should be clear from the template name, but redirects can be created to assist everyday use of very popular templates. So, yes, I seriously thought that it would be an uncontroversial improvement, especially considering CNY (in mainspace) is a redirect to Renminbi. As there was an objection, I will revert myself and open a mass RM for all of them. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Gehailun (23:21, 8 September 2024)

Hello Mentor. I have been making some edits to an entry, including adding some references. When I publish I get a message regarding the citation for the journal: Cite journal and check issn value. I don't understand why that is happening. Can you help me? Thanks. --Gehailun (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have corrected the ISSNs. To do so, I clicked on the invalid ISSNs, which took me to this WorldCat search (WorldCat is a very helpful tool when writing on Wikipedia!), which gave me the corrected ISSN: 1528-2708. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Gehailun (12:55, 9 September 2024)

Dear HouseBlaster, Thanks for your help with the journal citation yesterday. I have another question. As you may know, in Chinese names the surname is typically placed first, followed by the given name. The artist whose article I am editing would like to follow this custom. I have been able to change the order in the first paragraph of the article, but I don't seem to have the authority to change the order in the article title. This also has an impact on wikilinks with which the page has been associated: Living people, 21st century Chinese calligraphers, 21st century Chinese painters, and Chinese artist stubs. In all, the artist is listed under "M" (the given name) rather than "W" (the surname). I would like to rectify this but don't seem to have the authority to do that either. Thanks for your advice. --Gehailun (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Before I can answer that question, I need to know if you are being paid to edit. Paid editing is taken very seriously on Wikipedia. HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-37

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
 
  • Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up
    • Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase
    • Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
  • If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories

Hello, HouseBlaster,

All of the "Fair use" categoories that you proposed for speedy renames (like Category:Fair use Unknown magazine covers and Category:Fair use Galaxy Science Fiction magazine covers) were moved by JJMC89 bot III hours ago to the "Non-free" new categories but the contents of the categories haven't been moved yet. So the new categories are showing up on the "Empty categories" lists when it really is just a matter of time before they are filled. But you have spent more time working at CFD than I have and I was hoping you could tell me how much of a delay typically happens with this bot. Is this something to ask the bot operator about? I don't like to bother them so I was hoping you could clue me in on whether it generally takes a few hours to get everything moved, or a day or longer. Thanks for any information you can offer. Liz Read! Talk! 03:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

The issue with these is they are populated by a template, so someone needs to fix the template so it populates the new category. Then the job queue takes care of the rest. (When the bot moves categories, it usually happens essentially simultaneously.) I will update the templates now. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 03:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

  • The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Wikimania presentation
  • New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Javadshirazi1002 (15:34, 11 September 2024)

hello How can I contact a coach on WhatsApp or Telegram? I have an important job. Thank you --Javadshirazi1002 (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

What job do you have, Javadshirazi1002? HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I am a social media expert Javadshirazi1002 (talk) 16:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
@Javadshirazi1002: we are not a social media website. If you are not here to build an encyclopedia, you are in the wrong place. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I know where I stand, I just need help, why are high ranking people so cold and dry. I just need your help, that's all, my friend Javadshirazi1002 (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
What do you need help with, Javadshirazi1002? If you want to promote something, you are in the wrong place and I will not help you do so. HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Why are you so rude my friend? Please be calm. I don't want to advertise anything. Thank you for not helping, unfortunately I don't know why you became my coach. have a nice day Javadshirazi1002 (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

note re CfD status

thanks for all your helpful effort in closing CfD sections items recently. i have just added my consent for a proposed change, at a CfD for categories that i created. i can proceed as soon as the CfD is closed. so this seems to resolve the issues there. if you wish to see my specific comment on this, please check my own contribs history, and see my edit just now at that page. thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I try not to let people close-shop, so I will not take a look at your contributions. I will get to it when I get to it :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
ok, noted. i understand totally, sounds fine. thanks for all your great work, for the community. Sm8900 (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin September Issue 1


MediaWiki message delivery 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Could you check Draft:Giovanni Timoteo Calosso please

Hi, hope you are well. I saw that you are a helpful and active administrator and wanted to request that you review the draft and give feedback and/or accept it. Thanks. Perast (talk) 22:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello Perast! I am an administrator, but administrators do many different things on Wikipedia. I am not an active in the articles for creation process, so I am not able to help with that, unfortunately. If you have specific questions about Wikipedia policy, I would be more than happy to answer them! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

post move cleanup

Hey, I'm happy to chase you on some of the post move cleanup (at least for those articles that I have on my watchlist where it's easy to spot) on the renames, but just wanted to check with you if you have a list of the ones you're planning to move in case there are some that I don't cleanup (mainly updating the lead, default sort and the linked templates is the important part since the bots won't fix those)? Raladic (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I do not have a list I am working from; I am just doing them as I come across them. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Sounds good, I'll just try to chase and do what I can when I spot it and we'll see where we end up at. Hopefully the rest of the editing community also helps since it looks like various editors have started independently of each other to help with it :) Raladic (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
By the way, do you have an opinion of whether we should move the various Templates that have LGBT in the template name itself (like Template:LGBT or Template:LGBT sidebar) to LGBTQ and will redirects for those still works so we don't have to update the transclusions for those in all the articles that currently transclude the then potentially outdated name? Or is there a bot that could update outdated transclusions? Raladic (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Template redirects definitely work. For instance, {{t}} is a redirect to {{template link}}, which I have used to write this message. I think that making template moves is a good idea, though a lower-priority item than article/category/portal moves (which are visible to readers). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Ok good to know :)
But yes, I agree, the visible text stuff is more important, so that's why so far I've only updated the visible text in those templates I've encountered in my post move cleanup and left the template itself at the existing part. Raladic (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Reporter

Hello I am a reporter hoping to speak with you about Wikipedia editing -- could you please contact me on my Twitter @margimurphy? Thanks! Margimurphy (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-38

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Executive20000 (01:29, 17 September 2024)

Hello. I saw you were assigned to me as a mentor. Quick question: How can I make a photo ID of an image work while editing so that the image actually appears on the article instead of just the ID on the article itself. --Executive20000 (talk) 01:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

I am not entirely sure what you mean, Executive20000. Definitely not your fault that you don't magically know our jargon :)

Would you be able to give me an example of a photo ID? I think that would help me understand how to help you best. Thanks, HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
For example, I was trying to add a photo to an article and when I saved my changes, the entire link of the photo including “.jpg” at the end appeared instead of the photo itself. Executive20000 (talk) 01:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Ah. I think I get what you are talking about, Executive20000. To include an image, we have a tutorial. So, to include a file title "Example file 123.png", you would write [[File:Example file 123.png|thumb|alt=<A short description of what the image displays. This is used for blind people with screen readers so we can ensure Wikipedia is as accessible as possible> | <A caption which is displayed for everyone below the image>]] (replacing the bolded parts as needed). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Appreciate it very much.
Kudos, Stephen Sarsalari aka Executive20000 (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Jdog175 (01:01, 18 September 2024)

Hello, how do I create an article? --Jdog175 (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read WP:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out WP:TUTORIAL; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Shariffa mutua on Kenya Power and Lighting Company (12:20, 18 September 2024)

Hello how can i get the token reallocation form --Shariffa mutua (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@Shariffa mutua: Unfortunately, I am only able to answer questions about editing Wikipedia. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:JessZoiti/sandbox

  Hello, HouseBlaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:JessZoiti/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

A fresh new Cfd?

Hey there. Am I allowed to withdraw and the restart a few Cfd? I'm referring to the mess that is the baseball category where I'm being accused of having an agenda and making the Cfd in bad faith and so on. The main purpose of it, in my mind, has been lost entirely and I think a fresh one will let me clarify any misunderstanding there may have been. Asking for an opinion basically. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Omnis Scientia! If nobody else has opined in favor of a nomination you made, you can use XFD closer to close the nomination as speedy keep. I am not going to advise for or against it; you might consider whether the act of making a fresh nomination is going to raise or lower the temperature. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm not one to step out of the usual system of how things work and usually only withdraw if I realize the nomination I made was by mistake. So I'm a bit hesistant to do so. I think I will let this one go on and hope that a consensus is reached. If this closes as "no consensus" then I'll think about opening a new one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Works for me :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Thomasgallatin (18:08, 19 September 2024)

Hey! Can you take a look at my recent edits and let me know your thoughts? --Thomasgallatin (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Thomasgallatin, and welcome to Wikipedia! They all look fabulous. If I had to offer one way to improve, in this edit you swapped a primary source for a better primary source. That is an improvement, but not the biggest improvement we can make. On Wikipedia, we actually prefer secondary sources to primary sources. In this case, if you can find a news article from a reliable source (here is a list of sources and their reliability: As you would imagine, green is best), that would be even better. But you are taking great care to cite your sources when updating articles, and that is the most important thing on Wikipedia – especially when dealing with information about living people. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask. I am more than happy to help you! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:French Communist Party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Procedural question for CfD closes where redirects are kept

Hello, I need advice and I think you're probably the best person to provide it. I want to close the two CfD discussions about LGBT categories which you posted at CR as a consensus to rename and retain redirects. If it weren't for the redirects, I would just post a request on WT:CFDW, but I'm assuming the bot will automatically delete the redirects, and I don't see a way to specify that it shouldn't. Is there? Otherwise, I'll need to manually move the categories and then, I guess, use AWB to semiautomatically change the category on all articles, which would be quite tedious. Or just recreate the redirects afterwards, which I guess would be okay, although it feels sloppy. Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Compassionate727! To tell the bot to automatically leave a redirect, you add (case-sensitive) REDIRECT after the * but before the old category name. I usually paste the list into your selection of word processor and find and replace *[ with * REDIRECT [. And thank you for volunteering to close the discussion! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Do you know if a bot will automatically remove the CfD templates from the categories? Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
The bot will automatically remove the CfD templates from the categories :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-39

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for moving templates to better names. I think you are doing good work. I have one minor request: After you move a template, can you please click Edit and then Publish? In case you are unfamiliar, this is called a null edit, and it helps avoid having the template and its subpages show up in various error reports, including Wikipedia:Database reports/Uncategorized templates. It's a small thing, but it will help your fellow gnomes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I can do that. Thanks, Jonesey95, for all the work you do :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin September Issue 2


MediaWiki message delivery 17:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Closures not processed

Just a note that your closures on the CfD log page of 19 September have not been processed yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, Marcocapelle! HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, HouseBlaster,

I'm hoping you can find a solution for a problem I encountered (or started, I'm not sure). Another admin deleted this category as a CSD C1 which was not appropriate because it was being discussed at CFD. So, I restored it but they also emptied the category so now it is an empty category. Can you take a minute and close this discussion to bring this to closure? Thanks for any assistance you can supply. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

You definitely did not cause a problem, Liz.
@JoJan: WP:C1 requires that the category be empty for seven full days as well as not currently under discussion at CFD. Any renames of categories need to go through CFD. That has been reversed by Liz, so no harm no foul – but something to keep in mind for the future :)
There was not currently consensus in the discussion to merge, but if a subject-matter expert believes it should be merged I think we should defer to their judgement. Therefore, I have !voted to that affect. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 03:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

LGBT categories not redirected

Regrettably, many of the categories speedily renamed from the speedy nominations at [17] were not coded with *REDIRECT, so no redirects were left at the old names. The intersection categories by date and media are probably not worth recreating as redirects, and we don't need the template-generated ones for stubs nor the container categories e.g. "LGBT by continent", but I recommend that you do recreate the others e.g. LGBT for each country. – Fayenatic London 11:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I will do that. Thank you, Fayenatic london! HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  Done. HouseBlaster (he/they) 03:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-40

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Question from Hushquid (17:38, 30 September 2024)

Hi mentor --Hushquid (talk) 17:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Hushquid! Let me know if there is anything you need help with! HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
How long will it take this my User:Hushquid Wikipedia article to be published? Hushquid (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Hushquid: That is a userpage, not an article. Your userpage is the place to tell other Wikipedians about yourself. If you want to get it published, you need to read the entirety of our autobiography guideline. Because it is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, I can only point you to relevant policies and guidelines – it is up to you to read them – but I can answer clarifying questions after you have read the guideline.
I have a question for you: Is File:Hushquid home blackguard.jpg is selfie? Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
yes is a selfie Hushquid (talk) 21:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
please how can I turn it into a artist, I went to get published. Hushquid (talk) 22:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Hushquid: You can read our autobiography guideline, which will explain why you shouldn't try to get it published. It also explains how to do so, if you really want to. But again: I strongly discourage attempting. You are probably not notable, by Wikipedia's definition of the term. If you are not notable by Wikipedia's definition of the term, the article will just get deleted. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
you mean this page cannot get published. Hushquid (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Hushquid: It is very unlikely. Do you have any significant coverage in reliable sources, such as newspapers? Interviews do not count. HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Question from Hushquid (13:52, 1 October 2024)

I just added ==earlier life== and ===name career=== to my page is it allowed of me to do that. --Hushquid (talk) 13:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hushquid: It is allowed, though I will reiterate that you are not writing a true Wikipedia article and it is not indexed by search engines. HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

 
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Question from Hushquid (19:51, 2 October 2024)

Why is that AntiDionysius deleted my so many times? --Hushquid (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Because you are trying to use Wikipedia to tell the world about yourself, which is against the rules. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Category:Riize

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Riize. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RachelTensions (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Question from Ceosanya (20:36, 6 October 2024)

Do I get paid for any articles --Ceosanya (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Ceosanya! Wikipedia is entirely written by volunteers; you do not get paid. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

A racecar for you!

  A racecar for you!
Hi HouseBlaster, great to meet you this weekend! Hope you enjoyed your conference experience and got home safe :) Accedietalk to me 15:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
@Accedie: It was great to meet you, too! I really enjoyed both your keynote and our conversation :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thoma Bravo Co-Founder BLP

Hi HouseBlaster, back in January, you helped with some edits on the Thoma Bravo company page. I'm working on an article draft for their co-founder, Carl Thoma and would appreciate your input there, as well. If you agree that he is notable, would you mind moving the draft to main space? Thank you, JBarTB (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, JBarTB! To request that an article be reviewed, you should add {{subst:submit}} (including the brackets) to the top of the article. I don't review drafts on request. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-41

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
  • The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Question from Dylanthepickleman (16:23, 23 September 2024)

Say hello and ask a question. E.g. How do I create a citation? --Dylanthepickleman (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

@Dylanthepickleman: Hi! Do you actually what to know how to create a citation, or did you just copy and paste the sample text? Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
um... 72.74.45.196 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
you cant copy and paste the sample text 😬 Dylanthepickleman (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
You can; I am just asking if you actually want to know the answer the to question or if you were making sure that the question feature works :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
might be the latter Dylanthepickleman (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
also, when I am editing a sample article, there are some words that show up with a red underline, but they are spelled fine as far as I can find.
Why are they underlined? Dylanthepickleman (talk) 15:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I am not entirely sure why. Sometimes your language is set to a different country's version of English, and that causes things to be considered errors when they are not. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

License change request

Hi, I got an email from you about changing the license on this image ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Msu-Languagebuilding-seabhcan.JPG) - Happy to change it, but I can't remember how to do that... ... Seabhcan 09:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Seabhcan! Thank you so so much for your quick response! The easiest way to do this is to simply reply here and say "I intended to release the image under the GFDL". I can take care of the wiki-code bits. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin October Issue 1


MediaWiki message delivery 23:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Messed up CFDW formatting

I wanted to tell you that the syntax you added to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working concerning the Indian Jain poets categories appears malformed. Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you; I will investigate. HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. I was about to suggest here for "Transgender identity in", based on Catégorie:Transidentité par pays [fr] and Categoría:Identidades trans por país [es]. Is it possible to reopen/relist as it was recently closened and not moved yet? --MikutoH talk! 00:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@MikutoH: Ack. The bot is moving them as I type this (and had already moved some when I started to write this message) The bot has moved the categories, and there is no way to stop the bot while it is currently processing things (besides blocking it, which is a very extreme measure). Reversing and reopening the move would be more work than simply renominating it (User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD will help with a batch nomination). Therefore, I would recommend opening a fresh move request, making it clear why this is taking place immediately after the last one and potentially pinging the participants in the previous discussion. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder: GA backlog drive

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of October. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:JessZoiti/sandbox

 

Hello, HouseBlaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy vanishing

In case you should encounter a similar situation again, please note that courtesy vanishing is a courtesy, not a right. Blocked users are not eligible. "A courtesy vanishing may be implemented when a user in good standing decides not to return" (my emphasis). Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 16:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Cabayi for the correction. Apologies for my confusion :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

Aspersions

I appreciate your thoroughness against aspersions [36], even when they consist of an unchallenged claim about the difficulty of finding more diffs that exhibit the same pattern of behaviour which I have supported with evidence. I was able to find another one, though [37], but I will look no further because it is time-consuming and also unnerving. However, I would be grateful if you could also remove Elinruby's aspersions against me. That would be fair and due. You will find an (incomplete) list in this edit [38]. Note that in the fourth one in the list (off-Wiki campaign) Elinruby mentions evidence privately submitted to the ArbCom; however, given the private nature of the evidence and the public nature of the accusation, it is aspersions and should be removed, please. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Gitz. Requests like this should be made to the clerk team as a whole, not just an individual. I am going to ask you to move this to either the workshop talk (or, if you wish to be discrete about it, which I would completely understand, by email to clerks-l lists.wikimedia.org). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
OK, thank you for the suggestion. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 23:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

No action on CfD closures

You seem to have a backlog of CfD closures you haven't handled through WP:CFDW or its talk page, such as Category:Cenozoic horses. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

@LaundryPizza03: Thank you for the note; I'll see what I can do :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 02:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
I came across Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_October_9#Category:Constituencies_of_the_National_Assembly_of_Botswana_(historic) and implemented it myself, as it was fiddly. – Fayenatic London 10:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, Fayenatic london! HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Group eponymous template categorization

Have we a quick way to remove these from their eponymous categories? Pretty much every single one of them is a member of their group's eponymous category and apparently shouldn't be. RachelTensions (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi RachelTensions! Unfortunately, I am unaware of a tool that would do something like that. Someone at WP:AWBREQ might have a better idea, but this seems difficult (mostly because you are not looking for the same character sequence in each template, if that makes sense). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 02:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Ah yes one of our AWB friends might be able to figure it out, thank you!
RachelTensions (talk) 02:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Barnstar

  The Admin Elections barnstar
Thanks for removing the {{Notice}}s on the candidate pages for the discussion period. I was wondering why my regex in AWB wasn't picking anything up ;-) –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
You are definitely getting this barnstar back at you after this thing is done, Novem Linguae. Thank you for everything you have done to get WP:EFA (which is the superior shortcut) off the ground :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey, want a bonus quest? I think we should go through every candidate page and delete =====General comments=====. It's redundant and is making the table of contents at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase look meh. Thoughts? :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Definitely agree.   Doing... HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
  Done, and thank you for the suggestion, Novem Linguae :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Amazing work. I'm doubling your salary! :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Whoot! These checks are getting so big ;) HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Growth News, October 2024

Trizek_(WMF), 15:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin October Issue 2


MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Question from Dman1423 (23:13, 24 October 2024)

i hate isochrone --Dman1423 (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Dman1423. Please only use the "ask a question" feature to ask questions. Thanks, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Quick favor to ask

Hello, I saw you on the list of recently active admins. Would you mind handling an edit request? I'd like to get this process started before the demands of life steal me away from wikipedia. GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.) 04:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

@GrayStorm: I have tagged the page. Please create the MFD page shortly :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 04:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Ironically, I had to step away from my computer for a few minutes after that. Funny how life is sometimes :) GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.) 04:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Adamantine topic ban

Hi HouseBlaster. Just a heads up that sanctions can be appealed anytime at AN (not just after six months). Assuming that this was a sanction under WP:CASTE, you should probably also log it there. RegentsPark (comment) 16:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Apparently it is a community sanction, rather than a purely admin-imposed sanction thus it can be placed only at WP:EDRC which was already done by HouseBlaster. Dympies (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I will correct the record regarding appeal time – thank you! I do not think this is a WP:CASTE sanction (even though it covers the same thing). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Category:American people who self-identify as being of Native American descent

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:American people who self-identify as being of Native American descent. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Whitewolfdog1 (talk) 22:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Closure in the archives

Hi HB. I appreciate your diligence in making this closure, but I believe it may have been a misreading of consensus. That discussion is marked by a total absence of uninvolved input; every last !vote is from people involved in the same disputes, with positions based on whether they agree or disagree with Adamantine123. I don't think that is sufficient basis for a community sanction. I believe letting the thread die is the better course - a more structured complaint can always be brought to AE, as the dispute is within a CT. Failing that, I believe "no consensus" is the appropriate outcome, or possibly resuscitating the thread for more input. Are you open to revisiting this? For the record, I've been in several disputes with people who !voted on either side of that, but I'm not involved on the caste dispute specifically or - I believe - with respect to Adamantine123. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

[Acknowledging I have seen this; I have to go pick up a family member momentarily, and will respond in full in within ~2 hours.] HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
This made absolutely zero sense. There was a clear cut consensus to topic ban Adamantine123 for his misconduct and the proposal stayed there long enough for the community to judge whether the proposal is correct or wrong. Most editors who participated in the thread never interacted with Adamantine123. It is also senseless to imagine that anyone was supposed to be going to WP:ARE over Adamantine's misconduct on ANI given such reports are rejected elsewhere per forum shopping.Dympies (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde93. I closed the thread after a request at WP:CR (which I now see was filed by the person who opened the thread). I would be happy to re-list the discussion for further input from outside voices. (And apologies for the delay in responding.) Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, a relisting would be much appreciated. I will endeavor to provide some input - I think that would only be fair. No apologies required. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Repetition of the same POV-pushing in the same caste article by User:Dympies for which they were topic banned. HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Category for Discussion :American people who self-identify as being of Native American descent

Hi there,

I saw the discussion at Categories for Discussion regarding "American People Who Self-identify as being of Native American Descent" was just closed.

It looks like people were still voting at the time the discussion was closed as no consensus. I think relisting it again would likely create clearer consensus. Would you consider reopening the discussion? Whitewolfdog1 (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Whitewolfdog1! I am not going to relist that discussion. It was already relisted twice, and per WP:RELIST In general, a discussion should not be relisted more than twice. Discussions on Wikipedia usually last a week; this one was open for a month. People had enough time to weigh in. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
You didn't mention WP:NONDEF, which is relevant in this instance because most of those added to this category (and its subcategories) neither mention this in their ledes or verify that there's no evidence for their heritage. And WP: ABOUTSELF would surely justify the generic "American people of Native American heritage" instead? Because the "self-ID" categories themselves state that this is for people who can't prove they're NA (which I doubt most subjects have said about themselves).
You also ignored the stronger issues of WP:CATV and WP:POVCAT. Was there any reason you missed those arguments out?
Despite more policy-based arguments supporting deletion, your "no consensus" close serves the purpose of siding with the less policy based (and fewer) !votes to keep the category.
There's simply no way to verify the majority of subjects in the way this category demands that isn't WP:OR, because most RSes don't discuss this issue in a way that's defining, verifiable and notable for the individuals themselves. There's also a risk this becomes a stick for people to beat others with, or to push a POV about persons they dislike.
The category itself is inherently non-neutral, much like "trans-identified male" and similar terms. See WP:SCAREQUOTES and WP:QUOTEPOV, which explain that there are multiple ways to distance from a claim in a way that raises suspicion about the person making it, and that these can make those statements not neutral. For BLPs, this is particularly problematic. Lewisguile (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

The point of a close is to summarize the key points of a discussion, not every argument that was made. The BLP argument was by far the most common thing mentioned by supporters of deleting the category, so that is what I focused on in the closing statement.

As for the other PAGs you cite: The defining argument was rebutted by Yuchitown. That is evidence the intersection is defining – and that would need to be rebutted. To make a successful WP:CATV argument for deletion (and not merely purging), you need to show that it is impossible to source. No such showing was made. (And nobody made a CATV argument for purging.) If a particular article should not belong in the category, that is not a reason to delete the entire tree. Finally, WP:POVCAT: A good deal of editors think that there is nothing negative about self-ID. There wasn't really any PAGs to go off of when making the determination about which side of the neutrality question is stronger. Taken together, I closed it as no consensus.

Obviously, you disagree with that assessment. You have my blessing to take this to WP:DRV; I will not be overturning my close. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Firstly, apologies if my prior message came off blunt—it was late and on a re-read, I think it could be read as more direct than I wanted it to be.
As for WP:CATV, this was raised as an issue in the discussions. If the category were purged, it would be eligible for speedy deletion anyway; if most things in the category fail WP:CATV, then the category is dubious at best and that's another argument for just deleting it.
However, I can see we're not going to agree here so I will hop on over to the deletion review thread and add my thoughts there instead. Have a good weekend. Lewisguile (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
I requested deletion review linked below. Whitewolfdog1 (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Question from Eisenheim10 (07:31, 27 October 2024)

Hello HouseBlaster, i’m here to learn new things, thank you for being my mentor. --Eisenheim10 (talk) 07:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Eisenheim10! Let me know if you need any help, and I will be more than happy to assist :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of video games with AI-versus-AI modes

  Hello, HouseBlaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of video games with AI-versus-AI modes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Damning info

 
Hello, HouseBlaster. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HistoryofIran (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Unless you sent me a second email, I responded earlier, HistoryofIran. Still am not planning to take action until the matter is resolved. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Ops, it went under spam, my bad. Bit ironic since I used to advise loads of customers to be aware of that during my time in customer service. Best. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories to be merged

Regarding this Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_October_17#Category:Ugandan_dermatologists. Who actually merges the cats (and deletes the old cats)? LibStar (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi LibStar! It appears I forgot to list that discussion at WP:CFDW. I will do so now. Thanks for the reminder :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. LibStar (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome HouseBlaster! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Min968_unban_request. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from Kristi Rock (16:02, 2 November 2024)

Hello there! I am trying to write an article or bio about a family friend and I am a little confused. I start the page on my user page correct under write an article where the cursor blinks? It tells you to start in "the box", is this the box? Then it tells me to name in article and makes it sound as if I am suppose to change my user name? Any help is greatly appreciated. --Kristi Rock (talk) 16:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Your user page is located at User:Kristi Rock, not User:Joseph Lee Lambert. However, because this person is a family friend, you have a conflict of interest. You need to follow the steps to disclose your conflict of interest. And, if we are being honest, most editors (myself included) would recommend that you find something else to edit about. Conflict of interest editing is a very big problem on Wikipedia, and we spend untold hours cleaning up after such editors. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Question from Lokpali (18:26, 3 November 2024)

Hello,

When will the pages I created be patrolled? I created many pages but only 1 is patrolled. --Lokpali (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Lokpali! There is a very large backlog of pages needing to be patrolled; there is no specific order in which pages are reviewed. You can read more about the process at WP:NPP, but many articles take months to get reviewed. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from HomelessProphet1929 (04:17, 4 November 2024)

How do I add an info box, like the ones in the articles for countries? Thanks. --HomelessProphet1929 (talk) 04:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@HomelessProphet1929: using the visual editor, you can follow the directions at Help:VisualEditor#Editing templates (infoboxes are templates). Let me know if you need help choosing which infobox template to use! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-45

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Category:Force-feeding victims

Hey, HouseBlaster,

I was going to tag this category CSD C1 but, within seconds, you filled it with articles. How did you categorize these articles so fast? I assume you used some editing tool or was it a template you used? Always curious on how to edit more efficiently. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Liz! I used Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot to facilitate the move from Category:Force-feeding to the people category. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 02:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, HouseBlaster. I've looked at Cat-a-lot several times over the years I've been editing but I found it too complicated to jump into. But I assume that this is also how some CFD closures are handled that aren't handled by a bot? Maybe I'll spend the time this week trying to figure it out. I've never gotten the hang of AWB either. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
It is how I do most CFD closes which do not need the bot (usually because you only need to merge some entries). I found it fairly easy to learn; the documentation at Commons is really helpful. It can be a little buggy at times (it was built to handle files), but it gets the job done the vast majority of the time. I am happy to help with questions if you have them :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 03:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1796 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

Category:Buildings and structures by year of demolition

I've contributed to tagging a lot of buildings into the demolition category on the understanding they were deliberately demolished. I completely disagree with the consensus that was reached at that discussion, but now it's closed, I'm one user and am unable to overturn it on my own. My suggestion would be to have a category for buildings that were demolished and another for buildings that were destroyed. I only noticed because of my watch list.

What do you recommend here? Could I start a new CfD? SportingFlyer T·C 05:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi SportingFlyer! The consensus in the discussion was that this tree should mirror Category:Buildings and structures by year of completion, and contain buildings destroyed by any cause whatsoever, including demolition. Your options include a fresh CFD (User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD is very helpful for mass nominations), though I would warn that the participants in the old discussion see the rescoping as a feature, not a bug. You could also create a new subcategory of the destroyed categories for intentional demolition, though I would consider self-CFDing one or two of those categories to ensure there is consensus for their existence before creating a massive tree. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
I did voice my displeasure on the page outside the closed discussion and someone else agreed with me. The problem is we just renamed a bunch of categories where every building would have been "demolished" but not "destroyed," so the "correct" thing to do would have been to rename the top category and then create a new set of subcats like we have for building collapses. I'm really frustrated by this sadly, though that has nothing to do with you! SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
I see you have filed Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction. I will tag all of the subcategories for you :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
What is going on here? Is this just a reversion of the Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Category:Buildings and structures by year of demolition closure? Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
SportingFlyer has filed a fresh CFD to reverse the already-closed CFD. Nothing has been reverted yet. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin November Issue 1


MediaWiki message delivery 22:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Chemical Loop Technologies

Hey,

I know the discussion was archived at a non-consensus. I was going back through the Project page and came across it again. After re-reading the inputs from @DMacks , specifically, I took another look at the articles in question. While I agree with DMacks that it would be more akin to a separations process on re-review (compared to my original assesment), it is still not a great descriptor, as DMacks point it out as well, because its not the exact same function as a adsorpition bed.

I went out and looked elsewhere to see if I could find anything regarding the topic name, which seems to be big in academic circles regarding Carbon Capture. I landed upon this article from the Royal Chem Society, with this specific quote:

"Although the term “chemical looping” was first minted by Richter and Knoche in 1983 in the context of reducing exergy loss in fossil fuel combustion,1 the concept of chemical looping (CL), i.e. decomposition of a chemical reaction into multiple sub-reactions facilitated by solid reaction intermediates, was investigated long before that. Owing to the pressing demand for carbon emissions reduction,4,5 chemical looping combustion (CLC) has been studied extensively over the past three decades as a new technology for power generation with integrated CO2 capture,6–22 as evidenced by more than 2400 peer-reviewed publications to date (based on the chemical abstracts service)."

From this, I think Im personally going back towards Category:Chemical processes for both things, but would rather see something related to carbon capture, environmental process, etc. to better describe it. As I said before, these specific topics seem to be very geared towards carbon capture and maximizing chemical process energy so little goes to waste in terms of energy, while also being a source of carbon capture.

I would really also like @DMacks input on this as a professor/academic of Chemistry regarding the literal reaction part of both CLC and CLR ChemicalBear (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi ChemicalBear! I am going to be very honest and say that I do not understand what you are saying (almost certainly due to my complete lack of formal training in chemistry!). Would you like the CFD to be reopened? If so, I would recommend filing a new CFD instead and pinging the previous participants. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've reopened the topic in a new CFD here. I appreciate your honesty, I was just reaching out because you were last point-of-contact from that discussion! ChemicalBear (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from Aneesjameel on Wikipedia:U (18:32, 30 October 2024)

--Aneesjameel (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Aneesjameel! Do you have any questions about editing Wikipedia? HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes Amogelang22 (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Biography of yourself

tell us about your self Life Amogelang22 (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay Amogelang22 (talk) 11:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from Amogelang22 on User talk:HouseBlaster (16:01, 9 November 2024)

Can you help me with publishing My first story that I wrote 5 months ago --Amogelang22 (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

I cannot. This is an encyclopedia, not a place for stories. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from Good baker on Top Chef Canada season 11 (16:36, 9 November 2024)

Hello who do I edit and make episode title cards --Good baker (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello Good baker, and welcome to Wikipedia! You can edit whatever topics you like (as long as you do not have a conflict of interest with them). I am not sure what you mean by episode title cards. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
You know how you make a new page for a new season of a show and there’s an episode part that you edit and make the title cards so I’m wondering how do you do that Good baker (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Are you referring to the box at the right of the article which summarizes key information? I admit I do not regularly edit TV articles, but if you want to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television they might be better able to assist you (WikiProjects are groups of editors who work on specific groups of articles – in this case, TV). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Question from Siraj Aizlewood (19:09, 9 November 2024)

Hi HouseBlaster didn't realise I'd get a mentor that's amazing, thank you.

I have an article I'd like to publish, but can see that the Contribute button is greyed out. I guess I have to "level-up" first?

Any chance i could send the article to you, and you could give me some pointers?

All the best,

Siraj --Siraj Aizlewood (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

To publish an article directly, you need to be "autoconfirmed" (which requires 4 days experience and 10 edits). You can use the article wizard to submit a draft before you are autoconfirmed. Once you have created your draft, I would be happy to give you some pointers. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Query

Hello, HouseBlaster,

There were some speedy category renames yesterday (from U.S. Presidents categories to United States Presidents categories) and User:JJMC89 bot III should have recategorized all of the talk pages on Nov. 8th but it still hasn't and it's almost been 24 hours since the categories were moved. See Category:B-Class U.S. Presidents articles as an example.

Does it usually take this long or did something happen with the bot? Because all of the United States Presidents articles categories are empty right now. In the past, I've brought this question to the bot operator but they say that they created the bot but do not control how it is utilized with CFD requests. Just hoping you can make some magic edit to resolve this or tell me that I should give the bot more time to do its work. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Liz! Those categories are all populated by a template, which the bot cannot fix. (The bot is being updated soon to do this automatically, and I am very excited!) I made some updates to {{WikiProject United States}}, which will automatically fix the issue once the jobqueue catches up. Thank you for pointing this out :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Do you have some magic goggles to know when it's a template responsible for filling categories? Because I see to run into this fairly regularly, categories that suddenly go empty. I have a script installed that allows you to see when someone added or removed a page from a category but when this happens, there is just no information at all. Typically, this is because someone has tinkered with a template, creating an error but it can be hard to trace back what template it was when this happens. Thanks for the information. I came to the right admin! Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
I make creative use of WP:HOTCAT to make the determination. If you go to Australia#footer, you can see "−" and "(±)" symbols next to Geographical articles missing image alternative text, which means that you can edit it with HOTCAT, and therefore is not added by a template. Coordinates on Wikidata does not have those symbols, so you cannot edit it with HOTCAT, thus it is template-generated. To determine what template is the culprit, it is generally just a bit of guess and check, while making sure your guesses smart. In this case, I (correctly) guessed that we wanted {{WikiProject United States}} would have something to do with Category:B-Class U.S. Presidents articles. HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
It was also {{WikiProject United States Presidents}}. Gonnym (talk) 02:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
On the subject of templates and categories, HouseBlaster and Gonnym, do you know what changes would have caused all of the categories in Category:Native American multilingual support templates and some in Category:Wikipedia multilingual support templates to empty out? Was there a TFD discussion involved here? Liz Read! Talk! 20:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Yes. Almost all lang-?? templates are being deleted and replaced with {{Langx}}, see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_27#Replace_and_delete_lang-??_templates. There really is no need to keep those categories 7 days. Gonnym (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
I have no idea, though perhaps Gonnym does. HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Well, there's my answer! HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-46

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)