Iamjohnchan

Welcome!

Hello, Iamjohnchan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Big Six (English Football), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NtheP (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Six (English Football)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Big Six (English Football) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Please note

Saffir–Simpson scale, 1-minute maximum sustained winds

Category	m/s	knots	mph	km/h
5	≥ 70	≥ 137	≥ 157	≥ 252
4	58–70	113–136	130–156	209–251
3	50–58	96–112	111–129	178–208
2	43–49	83–95	96–110	154–177
1	33–42	64–82	74–95	119–153
TS	18–32	34–63	39–73	63–118
TD	≤ 17	≤ 33	≤ 38	≤ 62

Hello and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I have recently observed that you have made slight changes to the article on Typhoon Nesat. I am so sorry to say that i couldnt stop myself from reverting your edits. Please note, that the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS), or the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale (SSHWS), classifies hurricanes — Western Hemisphere tropical cyclones that exceed the intensities of tropical depressions and tropical storms — into five categories distinguished by the intensities of their sustained winds. To be classified as a hurricane, a tropical cyclone must have maximum sustained winds of at least 74 mph (33 m/s; 64 kn; 119 km/h) (Category 1). The highest classification in the scale, Category 5, is reserved for storms with winds exceeding 155 mph (69 m/s; 135 kn; 249 km/h).

As i see, you have changed cat1 to cat2 and i am extremely sorry to say, this could not be accepted. Per the SSHS, Storms of Category 2 have a minimum wind speed of 85 knots (157 km/h; 98 mph) and they are strong enough to lift a house and inflict damage upon poorly constructed doors and windows. Vegetation, poorly constructed signs, and piers can receive considerable damage. Mobile homes, whether anchored or not, are typically damaged, and many manufactured homes also suffer structural damage. Small craft in unprotected anchorages may break their moorings. Extensive to near-total power outages and scattered loss of potable water are likely, possibly lasting many days.

Typhoon Nesat according to the JTWC, is currently only a Category 1 Tropical Cyclone. It has a windspeed of 80 knots (150 km/h; 92 mph). Category 1 storms usually cause no significant structural damage; however, they can topple unanchored mobile homes, as well as uproot or snap trees. Poorly attached roof shingles or tiles can blow off. Coastal flooding and pier damage are often associated with Category 1 storms. Power outages are typically widespread to extensive, sometimes lasting several days. Even though it is the least intense type of hurricane, the storm can still produce plenty of widespread damage and can be a life-threatening storm.

Also, to practice editing, go to the sandbox and click the "Edit" tab. When you click the "Edit" tab, that will open an editing window containing the text for that page. Type in something fun and interesting, or just replace words for your own words. Now click the Save page button and see what you have done! First, any time you edit a page, it is considered good etiquette (or "Wikiquette") to enter an explanation of your changes in the Edit summary box, which you'll find below the edit window. It's okay for your explanation to be quite short. For example, if you are making a spelling correction, you might just type "typo". Also, if the change you have made to a page is minor, such as correcting a spelling or grammar error, it's helpful if you check the box "This is a minor edit". (This box is only available if you have logged in.) For your sandbox edit, you probably want an edit summary such as "Testing". Second, you should always use the Show preview button. After you've entered a change in the edit box for the sandbox, click the Show preview button instead of Save Page. This lets you see what the page will look like after your edit, before you actually save. We all make mistakes; this feature helps you catch them before other people see them. Using Show Preview before saving also lets you try format changes and other edits without cluttering up the page history. Do not forget to save your edits after previewing, though!

I hope my loooong lecture was helpful. Regards. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 15:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Sorry, I've made a mistake. Thanks for reminding me! Iamjohnchan (talk) 11:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Copying & paste move

I have deleted 2013–14 Liverpool FC season as a copy & paste of 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season; I am going to assume good faith and hope you did not make the move in order to try and bypass page protections. GiantSnowman 09:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

But would you consider giving the others' right to edit 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season so that we can update the info more frequently?

Until the dispute is settled you should make edit requests at the article talk page. GiantSnowman 09:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

already made, and btw, what kind of dispute is that? It causes lots of inconvenience for us, and we cannot do any updating, seems the one who locks don't update frequently.

Infobox update and statistics update

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that when making updates to something in a infobox you should update ENTIRE infobox and the date it was updated. With this update you made you only updated top scorer and at the bottom of infobox it says "updated 24 January" which is wrong. Such edits are considered disruptive and will be reverted and you risk getting warned. Please also make sure to verify all of the statistics you update with the sources for each stat. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

This also applies to other edits such as this. You must update at the bottom (or top) of each stats section. QED237 (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2013–14 Premier League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. As I have told you before, do not only update Liverpool players, upidate entire table according to source or leave it QED237 (talk) 23:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liverpool F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iamjohnchan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison

The article UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clubs performance comparison are not notable according: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHF Champions League clubs performance comparison

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malo95 (talk) 08:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malo95 (talk) 14:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)