Infosecwiki

Security Scorecard

Hi :) Are you in any way affiliated with Security Scorecard? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello - yes, I am loosely affiliated with SSC as well as many other infosec groups such as HackMiami. It is nice to meet you. Infosecwiki (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Nice to meet you too! Your contributions are welcome; we just need to make sure that you disclose your affiliation with articles you create or edit. There are a few pages I'd recommend to read before continuing.

• Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with close associations
• Wikipedia:Tutorial/Keep in mind#Neutral point of view

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Infosecwiki! Thank you for your contributions. I am ToBeFree and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve SecurityScorecard

Hi, I'm Ammarpad. Infosecwiki, thanks for creating SecurityScorecard!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please don't remove tag on unresolved issues. Read about WP:COI and WP:PAID

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

–Ammarpad (talk) 07:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you User:Ammarpad. The resources are useful, I am reviewing them now. I have a few questions as to the best next steps, and posted the question to your talk board. Thank you for reaching out! Infosecwiki (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

User:AmmarpadUser:Infosecwiki I have made some changes to the article to clean it up - removing promotional referneces to any products, redundancies, grammar fixes, and data flow. Citations also added for updated information obtained from news outlets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrammarCop123 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Infosecwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Infosecwiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam Kassoumeh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sam Kassoumeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of SecurityScorecard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SecurityScorecard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecurityScorecard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Brandon (talk) 00:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexander Heid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Heid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Heid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Brandon (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Undisclosed WP:COI?

Raised this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Heid as well, but thought I'd add it here given my concerns. Infosecwiki, do you have a WP:CONFLICTOFINTEREST that you need to disclose? At the AfD you state that Heid is "the lead media liaison, and assisted in the entire process all the way through fact checking with RollingStone editors." You also state that "he was also the lead PR liaison" on the Financial Times piece. Neither the Rolling Stone nor FT pieces say that Heid coordinated the PR process, and the HackMiami site does not say that either. That's the kind of information that, if true, could only be obtained by someone affiliated with or otherwise close to Heid and HackMiami. That plus the fact that you have only edited on these two topics raises concern that you may have an undisclosed conflict of interest. Can you address this? Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)