User talk:Ippantekina/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hi Ippantekina! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Muhandes (talk) 09:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Taeyeon, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State of Grace (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article State of Grace (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State of Grace (song)

The article State of Grace (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:State of Grace (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State of Grace (song)

The article State of Grace (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:State of Grace (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

New message from TheSandDoctor

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album) § Associated Press. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Red (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red (Taylor Swift song)

The article Red (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Red (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red (Taylor Swift song)

The article Red (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Red (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Knew You Were Trouble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Knew You Were Trouble

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Knew You Were Trouble you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Knew You Were Trouble

The article I Knew You Were Trouble you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:I Knew You Were Trouble for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Knew You Were Trouble

The article I Knew You Were Trouble you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:I Knew You Were Trouble for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for London Boy (Taylor Swift song)

On 23 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article London Boy (Taylor Swift song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Taylor Swift song "London Boy" features a spoken-word intro by English actor Idris Elba? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/London Boy (Taylor Swift song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, London Boy (Taylor Swift song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London Boy (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article London Boy (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for I Knew You Were Trouble

On 24 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I Knew You Were Trouble, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "I Knew You Were Trouble" made Taylor Swift (pictured) the first artist to have two songs each sell over 400,000 digital copies within the first week of release in the U.S.? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I Knew You Were Trouble. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I Knew You Were Trouble), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London Boy (song)

The article London Boy (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:London Boy (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

State of Grace (song)

Thank you very much for your help. Ippantekina (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Discussion of This Is Me Trying Deletion

Hello. I created the original version of This Is Me Trying, which you have redirected with the point that it fails WP:NSONG. I have read the guidelines and understand that the article does not meet the guidelines. I am thinking of re-userfying the article and making improvements so that it would meet the guidlines. Would you be alright with that happening, considering you deleted the article? TheCartoonEditor (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

@TheCartoonEditor: Hi, just want to note that I didn't delete the article, but redirected, so if you can find ways to improve the article you can always create it again. Make sure that it meets the guideline though, and all should be set :) Ippantekina (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Changing chart publishers

Hello. Can you please not make this kind of edit where you change publisher= to, for example, ARIA Charts, Official New Zealand Music Chart and Irish Singles Chart? How do you think a chart is a publisher itself? Those charts are the published works, not the publishers themselves. The publishers are, respectively: Australian Recording Industry Association; Recorded Music NZ; and the Irish Recorded Music Association in cooperation with the Official Charts Company. You have to seem a misunderstanding or some sort of different conception around what a publisher= is, but this is entirely incorrect. A chart cannot publish itself; they are just the names of the charts, so please stop making this mistaken edit (website= is entirely sufficient for Hung Medien sites republishing this data), and please correct instances where you have made it (seemingly on discography's like Rihanna's and Taylor Swift's). You don't have to change back to website=, but please look to see who the charts are published by and change them to that. It would be appreciated. I understand you've simply used the publisher= parameter to name the chart the data pertains to, but using this parameter for this purpose is somewhat misleading. Anyway, if you need future help identifying which organisation publishes which chart, I will help you out. Thanks. Ss112 17:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Other edits

Sorry for going through your other edits, but this edit speaks to a lack of knowledge of what other charted songs sections are for. They are not for singles ("Paris in the Rain" is listed in the singles section) that charted in other countries that are not listed as a column in the singles section. They are only for songs that weren't singles that charted. That's their entire purpose. The singles section already has 10 columns Lauv performed the best in, so unfortunately, that is at its recommended limit. Ss112 17:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Also, please see WP:USCHARTS. It appears you have gone through a number of Rihanna's singles and albums articles and added the R&B Songs or R&B Albums chart when the album or song already charted on the overall R&B/Hip-Hop Songs or R&B/Hip-Hop Albums charts. These should not both be present for entries after 2013. Please remove them where you have added them for albums and songs released after this period. Thanks. Ss112 18:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Taylor Swift

regarding this revert - MOS:PERTINENCE states that editors should "Strive for variety [...] If an article on a military officer already shows its subject in uniform, then two more formal in-uniform portraits would add little interest or information". therefore, it makes little sense to have three pictures of Swift doing the same action, as it is repetitive for the reader; her musical ability is more than sufficiently represented by two photographs as well as the descriptions of her knowledge of instruments in the existing text.--Bettydaisies (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

@Bettydaisies: Hello, thank you for the message. 3/11 of the images show Swift on her instrument (the Speak Now World Tour image shows her on a banjo), so I'd say that number is not overwhelming to diminish variety. There are pictures of her at galas, awards shows, etc. Plus a photo of her performing is better than a photo of her standing and smiling, no? Ippantekina (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm specifically referring to the images in the "Life and career" portion of the text. In that case, three of the seven images of Swift are of her playing an instrument, with two of them in succession of each other, which does appear to be repetitive to me. If the rhetoric is that a photograph of her with an instrument is better then one "standing and smiling", then most of the images have the capability to be replaced by Swift doing so - however, they aren't, for the benefit of variety, if that makes sense.--Bettydaisies (talk) 04:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

@Bettydaisies: It seems repetitive to you, but I don't see it that way personally. 3/7 is not overwhelming--it is barely simple majority. Alas, is this really a grave issue to the article's quality? Ippantekina (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't think it's a "grave issue to the article's quality", but I have sought to explain "what's wrong with three photos of guitar strumming" within that section of the body before attempting any further reverts. If you believe that it is a grave issue to the article's quality, then a simple change of one of the images to avoid quite a few images in the row of Swift doing the same thing while performing shouldn't be that significant.--Bettydaisies (talk) 00:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

@Bettydaisies: Considering 3/7 is barely simple majority, I disagree with your assessment. Swapping the current image (Swift strumming a guitar) with your alternative (Swift standing and smiling) does not enhance "variety". Your interpretation of MOS:PERTINENCE is twisted because you omit the following part: but a map of an important battle and an image of its aftermath would be more informative. In this context, your alternative is not "more informative" in any way. Ippantekina (talk) 01:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

It does enhance variety because it is, simply, not a picture of her strumming an instrument that directly follows another photograph of her strumming an instrument. I omitted that part because a picture of Swift standing and smiling and another picture of Swift playing the guitar both have the same informative value of absolutely nothing.--Bettydaisies (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Speak Now

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Speak Now you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Speak Now

The article Speak Now you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Speak Now for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

October reviews

It seems like your GAN for Fearless in the Music section is listed for over a month like my GAN nomination for the music group BTS. If you could do the review for the BTS article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enchanted (Taylor Swift song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Speak Now

The article Speak Now you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Speak Now for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 01:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor Swift album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fearless (Taylor Swift album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor Swift album)

The article Fearless (Taylor Swift album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fearless (Taylor Swift album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Rihanna singles discography

Congratulations, Ippantekina! The list you nominated, Rihanna singles discography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor Swift album)

The article Fearless (Taylor Swift album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fearless (Taylor Swift album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fearless (Taylor Swift album)

Hello! Your submission of Fearless (Taylor Swift album) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 07:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Speak Now

On 27 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Speak Now, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that with the album Speak Now, Taylor Swift became the first female musician to have 11 songs on the Billboard Hot 100 in the same week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Speak Now. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Speak Now), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for I Bet You Think About Me

On 5 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I Bet You Think About Me, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video to "I Bet You Think About Me" by Taylor Swift is co-written and directed by Blake Lively in her directorial debut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I Bet You Think About Me. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I Bet You Think About Me), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Forever & Always

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forever & Always you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Forever & Always

The article Forever & Always you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forever & Always for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Fearless (Taylor Swift album)

On 10 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fearless (Taylor Swift album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the title of Taylor Swift's 2008 album Fearless reflects Swift's attitude to embrace hardships in love and life? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fearless (Taylor Swift album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fearless (Taylor Swift album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wong Kar-wai

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wong Kar-wai you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GeneralPoxter -- GeneralPoxter (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wong Kar-wai

The article Wong Kar-wai you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wong Kar-wai for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GeneralPoxter -- GeneralPoxter (talk) 20:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wong Kar-wai

The article Wong Kar-wai you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wong Kar-wai for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GeneralPoxter -- GeneralPoxter (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Enchanted (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Enchanted (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hey Stephen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hey Stephen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Enchanted (Taylor Swift song)

The article Enchanted (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Enchanted (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 04:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Enchanted (Taylor Swift song)

The article Enchanted (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Enchanted (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hey Stephen

The article Hey Stephen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hey Stephen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hey Stephen

The article Hey Stephen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hey Stephen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

I Knew You Were Trouble

Hello again. I just wanted to say that you had a great attitude about the "I Knew You Were Trouble" FAC. I agree with your decision to withdraw the FAC based on the recent comments, and I wish you the best with the peer review. You have done a great job taking on the constructive criticism and reacting respectfully. That is not as easy as it may sound for some users (as I have reacted way too poorly to opposes and constructive criticism in the past). Apologies for leaving this rather random message, but I just wanted to let you know that you handled this very well. Have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• I was going to say the same thing! My first few FACs were rough and I didn't react to stuff the best. I have a bit more time now (but not really lol) so I will try to leave some comments at the peer review. Heartfox (talk) 20:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comments. I too was not in the good mood when the oppose came, but I found appropriate ways to vent and managed to not take on fellow editors. Either way, I look forward to your comments at the PR. It's always good to learn from experienced ones :) Ippantekina (talk) 01:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better than Revenge

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Better than Revenge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 04:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better than Revenge

The article Better than Revenge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Better than Revenge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 05:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better than Revenge

The article Better than Revenge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Better than Revenge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Paparazzzi -- Paparazzzi (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

"Country accent" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Country accent and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Country accent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing New (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nothing New (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing New (song)

The article Nothing New (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nothing New (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Dylx. Your recent edit(s) to the pages Message in a Bottle (Taylor Swift song) and I Bet You Think About Me appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted. If you believe the information was correct, please discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- dylx 16:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Taylor Swift Italian Certs

Hi Ippantekina. I noticed you removed my certs for Italy from the Taylor Swift discography. Please check the source for the italian certs again. You need to type "Taylor Swift" in the search bar and set the year (anno) to "Tutti gli anni" to find the certs. Unfortunately, there's no better link for the Italian certs.YGO24895 (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@YGO24895: I know. The problem is we need Italian chart positions to include Italian certifications per WP:DISCOGSTYLE#Per-release number 8. Ippantekina (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ippantekina. I din't know that. Thanks for letting me know. I'll only add them in the future, if the corresponding charts are also included.YGO24895 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Glad I could help. Happy editing-- Ippantekina (talk) 13:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--Jorgemguillen (talk) 20:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)== Changes in Taylor Swift Singles Discography countries ==

Hello Ippantekina, I realised that you usually update this page (Taylor Swift Single Discography) so I would like to consult with you. I think it would be an improvement to change Austria and Switzerland for Denmark and Norway. Denmark is already in albums´page so it would match better and I noticed that a lot of artists have Norway in their discography pages. Also these two countries update with more frecuency Taylor´s certifications there so they reflect better her comercial success. For example Switzerland hasn´t updated her certs since 2015... Regards and I hope hearing your answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorgemguillen (talk • contribs) 20:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Karma Man/GA1

Ippantekina, you opened this review on February 3 and said you'd be reviewing it soon, but it's been almost a month. If you're no longer interested in reviewing it, or don't expect to start and complete the review in the near future, we can always arrange to have the page deleted so it's available to find a new reviewer. Please let me know. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Hello, sorry for abandoning the review. I will arrange for a deletion right away. Best, Ippantekina (talk) 11:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Love (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article This Love (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Love (Taylor Swift song)

The article This Love (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:This Love (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song)

The article Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Long Live (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Long Live (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Speak Now

Hello again. I just wanted to drop by and say good luck with the FAC for Speak Now. Unfortunately, I will not be able to review the FAC, but I still wanted to wish you well about it. Aoba47 (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing New (song)

The article Nothing New (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nothing New (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Love (Taylor Swift song)

The article This Love (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:This Love (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song)

The article Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tree Critter (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Long Live (Taylor Swift song)

The article Long Live (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Long Live (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Taylor re-recordings

Hello! I have cited my sources that state that the songs on Taylor Swift's re-recorded albums were recorded no earlier than November 2020 by Taylor Swift herself. I am going to revert your reverts again. If you revert them AGAIN then I will start a new discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. To quote Taylor Swift "STARTING November 2020 I can re-record albums one through five all over again." If you understand fluent English this shouldn't be hard to understand. Tree Critter (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Tree Critter: She did not specifically say in the interview that she would re-record Fearless or Red by that time. The interview was in 2019, way before the intended rerecording date, so there could be discrepancies in real practice. You can report me to the AN if you want, but I adhere to WP:V and the GMA interview fails to verify the intended information. I shall revert your edits again. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 00:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Address

I sense that in the quest for GA and FA stats on certain articles some, not many mind you, editors are using a "stilted style" which you would not find in a routine conversation. I put my concern on one of these articles you are "passing" forward. I don't think you understand the detriment this brings to the site.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am not sure what you are referring to... but have a good day! Ippantekina (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)