Jayscott478

In response to your repeated posts at the Teahouse

Draft:Loop 129 is still located where it has been since you made it.

You should really read these instructions on how to write articles that won't be rejected or deleted and try again, though.

Posting the same question over and over (especially after multiple people have answered it) is disruptive. If you can't pay attention to what you're doing, then don't do it. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Correcting typos in other people's posts

I noticed you just went through the Teahouse and corrected capitalization and grammar in several other people's posts. I know you mean well, but I found out early on in my editing career that's it's considered rude to change someone else's post, even if it's to fix typos and style errors. If you just stick to article editing you should be fine. Happy editing. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

• I've blocked you for three hours for failing to heed the above warnings. If you continue to not pay any attention to people's responses or messages to you, you're only going to get into more and more trouble. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Only one account

It appears that you started editing without registering, as IP address 97.98.105.252. Then created account Jayscott478. And today created account User:Jayscott253. Using more than one account is called creating sock puppets, and will lead to you being permanently blocked. Going forward, please use only one account. David notMD (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

And if you also created User:Jayscott192, you may not use that account again, either. So, should you use User:Jayscott192 or User:Jayscott478 or any other account other than the new User:Jayscott253 you have just created, you are liable to be investigated for Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, and all linked accounts could be permanently blocked from editing. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jayscott478! You created a thread called It says "The article that you're looking for doesn't exist" at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jayscott478! You created a thread called Why are the links red at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jayscott478! You created a thread called Loop 142 is not exist? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jayscott478! You created a thread called I'll do this then at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayscott478, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Loop 129

Hello, Jayscott478. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Loop 129".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)